Abstract
Public family law decisions in English courts are ostensibly made to serve the best interests of the child, whose interests are given paramountcy under the Children Act 1989. Hence, there is little recognition of the capacity for decisions to constitute miscarriages of justice. This issue is of concern as research suggests that some family court decisions can have devastating long lasting consequences. This article considers the reasons why the ‘best interests’ narrative has dominated discussion in this area and asks, by considering the process of public family court decisions, whether less restrictive thinking is indicated. It is concluded that the public family law process lacks the checks and balances of the criminal justice system in its decision making, however the consequences of a decision, although made on a lower standard than that of a criminal court, are as severe for the child, the parents, wider family and for society generally if decisions are flawed but not recognised and addressed in the context of a miscarriage of justice.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Number of pages | 16 |
| Journal | Argument and Critique |
| Volume | 1 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| Publication status | Published - 15 Jan 2015 |
Bibliographical note
This is the author's accepted manuscript version of a paper published in Argument and Critique, licensed under the Creative Commons CC BY 3.0 license [https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/].UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Keywords
- Child protection
- family courts
- best interests
- public family law
- miscarriages of justice
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Public Family Law cases in the context of Miscarriages of Justice'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver