Public participation by appeal - insights from empirical evaluation in Finland

Jukka Similä, Aino Inkinen, Jonathan Q. Tritter

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Environmental law increasingly provides for participatory rights, including appeal rights, to ensure informed, legitimate decision-making. Despite consensus around the general need for participatory rights, including strong ones such as a right to appeal, public participation in environmental decision-making is often criticised. The critics' main argument is that the negative side effects resulting particularly from the use of strong participatory rights outweigh their benefits. Recent regulatory trends arising from better regulation policy to make environmental decision-making more cost-efficient tend to pay special attention to such arguments despite limited empirical evidence. This article provides evidence using material-concerning appeals against pollution permits in Finland and suggests that judicial review is a necessary and effective process for both protecting citizens' rights and improving the quality of environmental protection.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)391-416
Number of pages26
JournalJournal of Environmental Law
Volume20
Issue number3
Early online date28 Aug 2008
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2008

Fingerprint

Finland
appeal
decision making
participation
evaluation
environmental law
environmental protection
evidence
critic
citizen
regulation
trend
costs
pollution
public participation
rights
cost

Keywords

  • participation
  • appeal
  • pollution control
  • regulation

Cite this

@article{879471d9f8294d47bfee2923cae58d60,
title = "Public participation by appeal - insights from empirical evaluation in Finland",
abstract = "Environmental law increasingly provides for participatory rights, including appeal rights, to ensure informed, legitimate decision-making. Despite consensus around the general need for participatory rights, including strong ones such as a right to appeal, public participation in environmental decision-making is often criticised. The critics' main argument is that the negative side effects resulting particularly from the use of strong participatory rights outweigh their benefits. Recent regulatory trends arising from better regulation policy to make environmental decision-making more cost-efficient tend to pay special attention to such arguments despite limited empirical evidence. This article provides evidence using material-concerning appeals against pollution permits in Finland and suggests that judicial review is a necessary and effective process for both protecting citizens' rights and improving the quality of environmental protection.",
keywords = "participation, appeal, pollution control, regulation",
author = "Jukka Simil{\"a} and Aino Inkinen and Tritter, {Jonathan Q.}",
year = "2008",
doi = "10.1093/jel/eqn021",
language = "English",
volume = "20",
pages = "391--416",
journal = "Journal of Environmental Law",
issn = "0952-8873",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "3",

}

Public participation by appeal - insights from empirical evaluation in Finland. / Similä, Jukka; Inkinen, Aino; Tritter, Jonathan Q.

In: Journal of Environmental Law, Vol. 20, No. 3, 2008, p. 391-416.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Public participation by appeal - insights from empirical evaluation in Finland

AU - Similä, Jukka

AU - Inkinen, Aino

AU - Tritter, Jonathan Q.

PY - 2008

Y1 - 2008

N2 - Environmental law increasingly provides for participatory rights, including appeal rights, to ensure informed, legitimate decision-making. Despite consensus around the general need for participatory rights, including strong ones such as a right to appeal, public participation in environmental decision-making is often criticised. The critics' main argument is that the negative side effects resulting particularly from the use of strong participatory rights outweigh their benefits. Recent regulatory trends arising from better regulation policy to make environmental decision-making more cost-efficient tend to pay special attention to such arguments despite limited empirical evidence. This article provides evidence using material-concerning appeals against pollution permits in Finland and suggests that judicial review is a necessary and effective process for both protecting citizens' rights and improving the quality of environmental protection.

AB - Environmental law increasingly provides for participatory rights, including appeal rights, to ensure informed, legitimate decision-making. Despite consensus around the general need for participatory rights, including strong ones such as a right to appeal, public participation in environmental decision-making is often criticised. The critics' main argument is that the negative side effects resulting particularly from the use of strong participatory rights outweigh their benefits. Recent regulatory trends arising from better regulation policy to make environmental decision-making more cost-efficient tend to pay special attention to such arguments despite limited empirical evidence. This article provides evidence using material-concerning appeals against pollution permits in Finland and suggests that judicial review is a necessary and effective process for both protecting citizens' rights and improving the quality of environmental protection.

KW - participation

KW - appeal

KW - pollution control

KW - regulation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=55749103240&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://jel.oxfordjournals.org/content/20/3/391

U2 - 10.1093/jel/eqn021

DO - 10.1093/jel/eqn021

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:55749103240

VL - 20

SP - 391

EP - 416

JO - Journal of Environmental Law

JF - Journal of Environmental Law

SN - 0952-8873

IS - 3

ER -