Randomized clinical trial: MGrx versus standard debridement and expression for meibomian gland dysfunction

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

PURPOSE
This study aimed to compare the efficacy of a new device for meibomian gland debridement and expression to that of the conventional way of providing this treatment.

METHODS
Thirty participants (mean age, 36.4 ± 15.4 years; 77% female) fulfilling current Tear Film & Ocular Surface Society diagnostic criteria for dry eye disease and meibomian gland dysfunction were recruited (Research Registry, 10340). Fifteen participants each were randomized to receive a single treatment with either traditional debridement (using a golf-club spud), heating (10 minutes of Blepha EyeBag, Théa Laboratories, Clermont-Ferrand, France) and expression (with forceps), or the multimodal MGrx, which comprises a handheld device with heated debridement, massage, and expression attachments. Symptomatology, tear film, and ocular surface measures were assessed at baseline and at 4 and 8 weeks post-treatment.

RESULTS
Ocular Surface Disease Index, 5-Item Dry Eye Questionnaire, and Symptom Assessment in Dry Eye symptom questionnaire scores all improved significantly with both treatments (all p<0.001), with no subsequent deterioration for at least 8 weeks. The improvement was similar between treatment groups (all p>0.05). Clinical signs, of blink rate, tear film quality and quantity, ocular surface characteristics, and meibomian gland expressibility, were all unchanged with both treatments (all p>0.05) except for noninvasive tear breakup time, which deteriorated in the conventional treatment group (p=0.006) between 4 and 8 weeks post-treatment. No adverse reactions were reported, and all participants were able to tolerate treatment.

CONCLUSIONS
A single application of meibomian gland debridement and expression resulted in sustained improvements in the symptoms of dry eye disease, in both treatment groups. The MGrx device provides a safe and effective in-office treatment for evaporative dry eye disease, and has time and space advantages compared with conventional treatment.
Original languageEnglish
Number of pages8
JournalOptometry and Vision Science
Early online date13 Dec 2024
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 13 Dec 2024

Bibliographical note

Copyright © 2024, holder. This is a pre-copyedited, author-produced version of an article accepted for publication in Optometry and Vision Science. The published version of record [Semp, David A. BSc, MCOptom1; Dutta, Debarun PhD, FAAO1; Wolffsohn, James S. PhD, FAAO1∗. Randomized clinical trial: MGrx versus standard debridement and expression for meibomian gland dysfunction. Optometry and Vision Science ():10.1097/OPX.0000000000002204, December 13, 2024. | DOI: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000002204 ] is available online at: https://journals.lww.com/optvissci/fulltext/9900/randomized_clinical_trial__mgrx_versus_standard.242.aspx

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Randomized clinical trial: MGrx versus standard debridement and expression for meibomian gland dysfunction'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this