Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Recommendations to address respondent burden associated with patient-reported outcome assessment

  • Olalekan Lee Aiyegbusi
  • , Samantha Cruz Rivera
  • , Jessica Roydhouse
  • , Paul Kamudoni
  • , Yvonne Alder
  • , Nicola Anderson
  • , Robert Mitchell Baldwin
  • , Vishal Bhatnagar
  • , Jennifer Black
  • , Andrew Bottomley
  • , Michael Brundage
  • , David Cella
  • , Philip Collis
  • , Elin-Haf Davies
  • , Alastair K Denniston
  • , Fabio Efficace
  • , Adrian Gardner
  • , Ari Gnanasakthy
  • , Robert M Golub
  • , Sarah E Hughes
  • Flic Jeyes, Scottie Kern, Bellinda L King-Kallimanis, Antony Martin, Christel McMullan, Rebecca Mercieca-Bebber, Joao Monteiro, John Devin Peipert, Juan Carlos Quijano-Campos, Chantal Quinten, Khadija Rerhou Rantell, Antoine Regnault, Maxime Sasseville, Liv Marit Valen Schougaard, Roya Sherafat-Kazemzadeh, Claire Snyder, Angela M Stover, Rav Verdi, Roger Wilson, Melanie J Calvert
  • University of Birmingham
  • University of Tasmania
  • Merck Healthcare KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany.
  • Health Science Consultants, Inc., Mississauga, Ontario, Canada.
  • Oncology Center of Excellence
  • Bottomley Consulting Group
  • Queen's University at Kingston
  • Northwestern University, Evanston
  • Aparito
  • Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research University of Birmingham Birmingham UK; Department of Endocrinology Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust Birmingham UK; Centre for Endocrinology Diabetes and Metabolism Birmingham Health Partners Birmingham UK
  • Data Center and Health Outcomes Research Unit
  • RTI Health Solutions
  • Critical Path Institute
  • LUNGevity Foundation
  • QC Medica
  • Western Sydney University
  • Nature Medicine
  • Queen Mary University of London
  • European Medicines Agency
  • Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency
  • Modus Outcomes
  • Gødstrup Hospital
  • Mapi Research Trust
  • Johns Hopkins Schools of Medicine and Public Health
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

91   Link opens in a new tab Citations (SciVal)

Abstract

Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are increasingly used in healthcare research to provide evidence of the benefits and risks of interventions from the patient perspective and to inform regulatory decisions and health policy. The use of PROs in clinical practice can facilitate symptom monitoring, tailor care to individual needs, aid clinical decision-making and inform value-based healthcare initiatives. Despite their benefits, there are concerns that the potential burden on respondents may reduce their willingness to complete PROs, with potential impact on the completeness and quality of the data for decision-making. We therefore conducted an initial literature review to generate a list of candidate recommendations aimed at reducing respondent burden. This was followed by a two-stage Delphi survey by an international multi-stakeholder group. A consensus meeting was held to finalize the recommendations. The final consensus statement includes 19 recommendations to address PRO respondent burden in healthcare research and clinical practice. If implemented, these recommendations may reduce PRO respondent burden.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)650-659
Number of pages10
JournalNature medicine
Volume30
Issue number3
Early online date29 Feb 2024
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 29 Feb 2024

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • Humans
  • Patient Outcome Assessment
  • Patient Reported Outcome Measures
  • Consensus
  • Clinical Decision-Making

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Recommendations to address respondent burden associated with patient-reported outcome assessment'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this