Reforms to the market for audit and assurance services in the period after the global financial crisis

Evidence from the UK

Ilias G Basioudis, Michael Kend

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

There was little effect by the Global Financial Crisis (GFC) on audit practices in Australia, as the country was largely sheltered from the GFC. The U.K. and Europe which had experienced significant reforms to audit were not sheltered from the GFC and regulators and law makers were pressured to take further action. The key UK and European audit reforms included the expanded auditors' report, disclosures on materiality thresholds, bans, caps and restrictions on non-audit services, viability statements released by directors, more powers for audit committees and mandatory firm rotation by auditors. The aim of this exploratory research study is to obtain the views of relevant stakeholders in relation to the benefits and costs of the recent UK audit reforms and the new EU Audit Directive (July 2016), and via a synthesis of these results and a review of the relevant Australian accounting literature, consider whether there is scope and benefits for Australia to now adopt similar reforms to audit and assurance services. The study finds that there are significant reforms to audit that have benefited the UK audit profession, and an open debate in Australia needs to be considered regarding the need for similar reforms perhaps before the next wave of accounting scandals and corporate collapses. The study suggests a need for a more proactive approach to audit reform and this lends support to recent findings from Australian accounting research studies.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)589-597
JournalAustralian Accounting Review
Volume28
Issue number4
Early online date21 Dec 2017
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2 Dec 2018

Fingerprint

Audit
Assurance services
Global financial crisis
Auditors
Scandal
Audit committee
Costs and benefits
Disclosure
Accounting research
Nonaudit services
Materiality
Viability
Stakeholders

Bibliographical note

© 2017 John Wiley & Sons; © 2017 CPA Australia.

Funding: Aston University & RMIT University.

Keywords

  • Audit Reforms, Audit and Assurance Markets, Regulations

Cite this

@article{35c12416931a427c94d272c80aa1faff,
title = "Reforms to the market for audit and assurance services in the period after the global financial crisis: Evidence from the UK",
abstract = "There was little effect by the Global Financial Crisis (GFC) on audit practices in Australia, as the country was largely sheltered from the GFC. The U.K. and Europe which had experienced significant reforms to audit were not sheltered from the GFC and regulators and law makers were pressured to take further action. The key UK and European audit reforms included the expanded auditors' report, disclosures on materiality thresholds, bans, caps and restrictions on non-audit services, viability statements released by directors, more powers for audit committees and mandatory firm rotation by auditors. The aim of this exploratory research study is to obtain the views of relevant stakeholders in relation to the benefits and costs of the recent UK audit reforms and the new EU Audit Directive (July 2016), and via a synthesis of these results and a review of the relevant Australian accounting literature, consider whether there is scope and benefits for Australia to now adopt similar reforms to audit and assurance services. The study finds that there are significant reforms to audit that have benefited the UK audit profession, and an open debate in Australia needs to be considered regarding the need for similar reforms perhaps before the next wave of accounting scandals and corporate collapses. The study suggests a need for a more proactive approach to audit reform and this lends support to recent findings from Australian accounting research studies.",
keywords = "Audit Reforms, Audit and Assurance Markets, Regulations",
author = "Basioudis, {Ilias G} and Michael Kend",
note = "{\circledC} 2017 John Wiley & Sons; {\circledC} 2017 CPA Australia. Funding: Aston University & RMIT University.",
year = "2018",
month = "12",
day = "2",
doi = "10.1111/auar.12211",
language = "English",
volume = "28",
pages = "589--597",
journal = "Australian Accounting Review",
issn = "1035-6908",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "4",

}

Reforms to the market for audit and assurance services in the period after the global financial crisis : Evidence from the UK. / Basioudis, Ilias G; Kend, Michael.

In: Australian Accounting Review, Vol. 28, No. 4, 02.12.2018, p. 589-597.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reforms to the market for audit and assurance services in the period after the global financial crisis

T2 - Evidence from the UK

AU - Basioudis, Ilias G

AU - Kend, Michael

N1 - © 2017 John Wiley & Sons; © 2017 CPA Australia. Funding: Aston University & RMIT University.

PY - 2018/12/2

Y1 - 2018/12/2

N2 - There was little effect by the Global Financial Crisis (GFC) on audit practices in Australia, as the country was largely sheltered from the GFC. The U.K. and Europe which had experienced significant reforms to audit were not sheltered from the GFC and regulators and law makers were pressured to take further action. The key UK and European audit reforms included the expanded auditors' report, disclosures on materiality thresholds, bans, caps and restrictions on non-audit services, viability statements released by directors, more powers for audit committees and mandatory firm rotation by auditors. The aim of this exploratory research study is to obtain the views of relevant stakeholders in relation to the benefits and costs of the recent UK audit reforms and the new EU Audit Directive (July 2016), and via a synthesis of these results and a review of the relevant Australian accounting literature, consider whether there is scope and benefits for Australia to now adopt similar reforms to audit and assurance services. The study finds that there are significant reforms to audit that have benefited the UK audit profession, and an open debate in Australia needs to be considered regarding the need for similar reforms perhaps before the next wave of accounting scandals and corporate collapses. The study suggests a need for a more proactive approach to audit reform and this lends support to recent findings from Australian accounting research studies.

AB - There was little effect by the Global Financial Crisis (GFC) on audit practices in Australia, as the country was largely sheltered from the GFC. The U.K. and Europe which had experienced significant reforms to audit were not sheltered from the GFC and regulators and law makers were pressured to take further action. The key UK and European audit reforms included the expanded auditors' report, disclosures on materiality thresholds, bans, caps and restrictions on non-audit services, viability statements released by directors, more powers for audit committees and mandatory firm rotation by auditors. The aim of this exploratory research study is to obtain the views of relevant stakeholders in relation to the benefits and costs of the recent UK audit reforms and the new EU Audit Directive (July 2016), and via a synthesis of these results and a review of the relevant Australian accounting literature, consider whether there is scope and benefits for Australia to now adopt similar reforms to audit and assurance services. The study finds that there are significant reforms to audit that have benefited the UK audit profession, and an open debate in Australia needs to be considered regarding the need for similar reforms perhaps before the next wave of accounting scandals and corporate collapses. The study suggests a need for a more proactive approach to audit reform and this lends support to recent findings from Australian accounting research studies.

KW - Audit Reforms, Audit and Assurance Markets, Regulations

UR - https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/auar.12211

U2 - 10.1111/auar.12211

DO - 10.1111/auar.12211

M3 - Article

VL - 28

SP - 589

EP - 597

JO - Australian Accounting Review

JF - Australian Accounting Review

SN - 1035-6908

IS - 4

ER -