Refractive error and vision correction in a general sports-playing population

Fabrizio Zeri, Sabrina Pitzalis, Assunta Di Vizio, Tiziana Ruffinatto, Fabrizio Egizi, Francesco Di Russo, Richard Armstrong, Shehzad A. Naroo

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate, in an amateur sports-playing population, the prevalence of refractive error, the type of vision correction used during sport and attitudes toward different kinds of vision correction used in various types of sports. Method: A questionnaire was used for people engaging in sport and data was collected from sport centres, gyms and universities that focused on the motor sciences. Results: One thousand, five hundred and seventy-three questionnaires were collected (mean age 26.5 ± 12.9 years; 63.5 per cent male). Nearly all (93.8 per cent) subjects stated that their vision had been checked at least once. Fifty-three subjects (3.4 per cent) had undergone refractive surgery. Of the remainder who did not have refractive surgery (n = 1,519), 580 (38.2 per cent) reported a defect of vision, 474 (31.2 per cent) were myopic, 63 (4.1 per cent) hyperopic and 241 (15.9 per cent) astigmatic. Logistic regression analysis showed that the best predictors for myopia prevalence were gender (p < 0.001) and location of sport practice (p < 0.001). Sports that present higher prevalence of outdoor activity have lower prevalence of myopia. Contact lens penetration over the study sample was 18.7 per cent. Contact lenses were the favourite system of correction among people interviewed compared to spectacles and refractive surgery (p < 0.001). Conclusions: This study showed that sport was not associated with different levels of myopia prevalence in the adult population. However, subjects engaging in outdoor sports had lower rates of myopia prevalence. Penetration of contact lens use in sport was four times higher than the overall adult population. Contact lenses were the preferred system of correction in sports compared to spectacles or refractive surgery, but this preference was affected by the type of sport practised and by the age and level of sports activity for which the preference was required.

LanguageEnglish
Pages225-236
Number of pages12
JournalClinical and Experimental Optometry
Volume101
Issue number2
Early online date9 Nov 2017
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 25 Feb 2018

Fingerprint

Refractive Errors
Sports
Population
Refractive Surgical Procedures
Contact Lenses
Myopia

Bibliographical note

Copyright © 2018 by John Wiley & Sons. This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: Refractive error and vision correction in a general sports-playing population
Zeri, F., Pitzalis, S., Di Vizio, A., Ruffinatto, T., Egizi, F., Di Russo, F., Armstrong, R. & Naroo, S. A. 25 Feb 2018 In : Clinical and Experimental Optometry. 101, 2, p. 225-236 12 p., which has been published in final form at https://doi.org/10.1111/cxo.12626. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Self-Archiving.

Keywords

  • contact lenses
  • refractive error
  • refractive surgery
  • spectacles
  • sports
  • vision correction

Cite this

Zeri, Fabrizio ; Pitzalis, Sabrina ; Di Vizio, Assunta ; Ruffinatto, Tiziana ; Egizi, Fabrizio ; Di Russo, Francesco ; Armstrong, Richard ; Naroo, Shehzad A. / Refractive error and vision correction in a general sports-playing population. In: Clinical and Experimental Optometry. 2018 ; Vol. 101, No. 2. pp. 225-236.
@article{b38755370a7c4613a6bb47e1ecc6799c,
title = "Refractive error and vision correction in a general sports-playing population",
abstract = "Purpose: To evaluate, in an amateur sports-playing population, the prevalence of refractive error, the type of vision correction used during sport and attitudes toward different kinds of vision correction used in various types of sports. Method: A questionnaire was used for people engaging in sport and data was collected from sport centres, gyms and universities that focused on the motor sciences. Results: One thousand, five hundred and seventy-three questionnaires were collected (mean age 26.5 ± 12.9 years; 63.5 per cent male). Nearly all (93.8 per cent) subjects stated that their vision had been checked at least once. Fifty-three subjects (3.4 per cent) had undergone refractive surgery. Of the remainder who did not have refractive surgery (n = 1,519), 580 (38.2 per cent) reported a defect of vision, 474 (31.2 per cent) were myopic, 63 (4.1 per cent) hyperopic and 241 (15.9 per cent) astigmatic. Logistic regression analysis showed that the best predictors for myopia prevalence were gender (p < 0.001) and location of sport practice (p < 0.001). Sports that present higher prevalence of outdoor activity have lower prevalence of myopia. Contact lens penetration over the study sample was 18.7 per cent. Contact lenses were the favourite system of correction among people interviewed compared to spectacles and refractive surgery (p < 0.001). Conclusions: This study showed that sport was not associated with different levels of myopia prevalence in the adult population. However, subjects engaging in outdoor sports had lower rates of myopia prevalence. Penetration of contact lens use in sport was four times higher than the overall adult population. Contact lenses were the preferred system of correction in sports compared to spectacles or refractive surgery, but this preference was affected by the type of sport practised and by the age and level of sports activity for which the preference was required.",
keywords = "contact lenses, refractive error, refractive surgery, spectacles, sports, vision correction",
author = "Fabrizio Zeri and Sabrina Pitzalis and {Di Vizio}, Assunta and Tiziana Ruffinatto and Fabrizio Egizi and {Di Russo}, Francesco and Richard Armstrong and Naroo, {Shehzad A.}",
note = "Copyright {\circledC} 2018 by John Wiley & Sons. This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: Refractive error and vision correction in a general sports-playing population Zeri, F., Pitzalis, S., Di Vizio, A., Ruffinatto, T., Egizi, F., Di Russo, F., Armstrong, R. & Naroo, S. A. 25 Feb 2018 In : Clinical and Experimental Optometry. 101, 2, p. 225-236 12 p., which has been published in final form at https://doi.org/10.1111/cxo.12626. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Self-Archiving.",
year = "2018",
month = "2",
day = "25",
doi = "10.1111/cxo.12626",
language = "English",
volume = "101",
pages = "225--236",
journal = "Clinical and Experimental Optometry",
issn = "0816-4622",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "2",

}

Zeri, F, Pitzalis, S, Di Vizio, A, Ruffinatto, T, Egizi, F, Di Russo, F, Armstrong, R & Naroo, SA 2018, 'Refractive error and vision correction in a general sports-playing population' Clinical and Experimental Optometry, vol. 101, no. 2, pp. 225-236. https://doi.org/10.1111/cxo.12626

Refractive error and vision correction in a general sports-playing population. / Zeri, Fabrizio; Pitzalis, Sabrina; Di Vizio, Assunta; Ruffinatto, Tiziana; Egizi, Fabrizio; Di Russo, Francesco; Armstrong, Richard; Naroo, Shehzad A.

In: Clinical and Experimental Optometry, Vol. 101, No. 2, 25.02.2018, p. 225-236.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Refractive error and vision correction in a general sports-playing population

AU - Zeri, Fabrizio

AU - Pitzalis, Sabrina

AU - Di Vizio, Assunta

AU - Ruffinatto, Tiziana

AU - Egizi, Fabrizio

AU - Di Russo, Francesco

AU - Armstrong, Richard

AU - Naroo, Shehzad A.

N1 - Copyright © 2018 by John Wiley & Sons. This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: Refractive error and vision correction in a general sports-playing population Zeri, F., Pitzalis, S., Di Vizio, A., Ruffinatto, T., Egizi, F., Di Russo, F., Armstrong, R. & Naroo, S. A. 25 Feb 2018 In : Clinical and Experimental Optometry. 101, 2, p. 225-236 12 p., which has been published in final form at https://doi.org/10.1111/cxo.12626. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Self-Archiving.

PY - 2018/2/25

Y1 - 2018/2/25

N2 - Purpose: To evaluate, in an amateur sports-playing population, the prevalence of refractive error, the type of vision correction used during sport and attitudes toward different kinds of vision correction used in various types of sports. Method: A questionnaire was used for people engaging in sport and data was collected from sport centres, gyms and universities that focused on the motor sciences. Results: One thousand, five hundred and seventy-three questionnaires were collected (mean age 26.5 ± 12.9 years; 63.5 per cent male). Nearly all (93.8 per cent) subjects stated that their vision had been checked at least once. Fifty-three subjects (3.4 per cent) had undergone refractive surgery. Of the remainder who did not have refractive surgery (n = 1,519), 580 (38.2 per cent) reported a defect of vision, 474 (31.2 per cent) were myopic, 63 (4.1 per cent) hyperopic and 241 (15.9 per cent) astigmatic. Logistic regression analysis showed that the best predictors for myopia prevalence were gender (p < 0.001) and location of sport practice (p < 0.001). Sports that present higher prevalence of outdoor activity have lower prevalence of myopia. Contact lens penetration over the study sample was 18.7 per cent. Contact lenses were the favourite system of correction among people interviewed compared to spectacles and refractive surgery (p < 0.001). Conclusions: This study showed that sport was not associated with different levels of myopia prevalence in the adult population. However, subjects engaging in outdoor sports had lower rates of myopia prevalence. Penetration of contact lens use in sport was four times higher than the overall adult population. Contact lenses were the preferred system of correction in sports compared to spectacles or refractive surgery, but this preference was affected by the type of sport practised and by the age and level of sports activity for which the preference was required.

AB - Purpose: To evaluate, in an amateur sports-playing population, the prevalence of refractive error, the type of vision correction used during sport and attitudes toward different kinds of vision correction used in various types of sports. Method: A questionnaire was used for people engaging in sport and data was collected from sport centres, gyms and universities that focused on the motor sciences. Results: One thousand, five hundred and seventy-three questionnaires were collected (mean age 26.5 ± 12.9 years; 63.5 per cent male). Nearly all (93.8 per cent) subjects stated that their vision had been checked at least once. Fifty-three subjects (3.4 per cent) had undergone refractive surgery. Of the remainder who did not have refractive surgery (n = 1,519), 580 (38.2 per cent) reported a defect of vision, 474 (31.2 per cent) were myopic, 63 (4.1 per cent) hyperopic and 241 (15.9 per cent) astigmatic. Logistic regression analysis showed that the best predictors for myopia prevalence were gender (p < 0.001) and location of sport practice (p < 0.001). Sports that present higher prevalence of outdoor activity have lower prevalence of myopia. Contact lens penetration over the study sample was 18.7 per cent. Contact lenses were the favourite system of correction among people interviewed compared to spectacles and refractive surgery (p < 0.001). Conclusions: This study showed that sport was not associated with different levels of myopia prevalence in the adult population. However, subjects engaging in outdoor sports had lower rates of myopia prevalence. Penetration of contact lens use in sport was four times higher than the overall adult population. Contact lenses were the preferred system of correction in sports compared to spectacles or refractive surgery, but this preference was affected by the type of sport practised and by the age and level of sports activity for which the preference was required.

KW - contact lenses

KW - refractive error

KW - refractive surgery

KW - spectacles

KW - sports

KW - vision correction

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85042417503&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/cxo.12626

DO - 10.1111/cxo.12626

M3 - Article

VL - 101

SP - 225

EP - 236

JO - Clinical and Experimental Optometry

T2 - Clinical and Experimental Optometry

JF - Clinical and Experimental Optometry

SN - 0816-4622

IS - 2

ER -