Abstract
Lethal autonomous weapon systems (LAWS), while offering strategic advantages in warfare, pose significant ethical, legal, and security risks, especially for countries in the Global South. This article examines how a philosophical perspective, rooted in African ethical and political thought, can enrich regional and global debates on regulating LAWS, which remain dominated by Eurocentric assumptions. The findings of this study, which draw from secondary data, suggest that existing international and regional safeguards are insufficient to address the risks posed by LAWS. It proposes a dual-theoretical approach informed by technological determinism and grounded in ubuntu. This approach centres on collective human accountability and reinforces the imperative of meaningful human control in the design, deployment, and governance of LAWS to safeguard the security and sovereignty of affected states and communities. This article lays the groundwork for African-led regulatory mechanisms for emerging military technologies and offers an Afrocentric perspective on rethinking the global governance of LAWS.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Number of pages | 13 |
| Journal | Regulation & Governance |
| Early online date | 3 Dec 2025 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | E-pub ahead of print - 3 Dec 2025 |
Bibliographical note
Copyright © 2025 The Author(s). Regulation & Governance published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.Funding
This work was supported by Leverhulme Trust, ECF-2025-527.