Reliability of equine visual lameness classification as a function of expertise, lameness severity and rater confidence

Sandra Starke*, Maarten Oosterlinck

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Visual equine lameness assessment is often unreliable, yet the full understanding of this issue is missing. Here, we investigate visual lameness assessment using near-realistic, three-dimensional horse animations presenting with 0–60 per cent movement asymmetry. Animations were scored at an equine veterinary seminar by attendees with various expertise levels. Results showed that years of experience and exposure to a low, medium or high case load had no significant effect on correct assessment of lame (P>0.149) or sound horses (P≥0.412), with the exception of a significant effect of case load exposure on forelimb lameness assessment at 60 per cent asymmetry (P=0.014). The correct classification of sound horses as sound was significantly (P<0.001) higher for forelimb (average 72 per cent correct) than for hindlimb lameness assessment (average 28 per cent correct): participants often saw hindlimb lameness where there was none. For subtle lameness, errors often resulted from not noticing forelimb lameness and from classifying the incorrect limb as lame for hindlimb lameness. Diagnostic accuracy was at or below chance level for some metrics. Rater confidence was not associated with performance. Visual gait assessment may overall be unlikely to reliably differentiate between sound and mildly lame horses irrespective of an assessor’s background.
Original languageEnglish
Article number63
JournalVeterinary Record
Volume184
Early online date21 Sept 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 11 Jan 2019

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Reliability of equine visual lameness classification as a function of expertise, lameness severity and rater confidence'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this