Reply to Response to Vacuous standards – subversion of the OSAC standards-development process

Geoffrey Stewart Morrison; Cedric Neumann; Patrick Henry Geoghegan; Gary Edmond; Tim Grant; R. Brent Ostrum; Paul Roberts; Michael Saks; Denise Syndercombe Court; William C. Thompson; Sandy Zabell

doi:10.1016/j.fsisyn.2021.100149

Reply to Response to Vacuous standards – subversion of the OSAC standards-development process

Geoffrey Stewart Morrison, Cedric Neumann, Patrick Henry Geoghegan, Gary Edmond, Tim Grant, R. Brent Ostrum, Paul Roberts, Michael Saks, Denise Syndercombe Court, William C. Thompson, Sandy Zabell

Research output: Contribution to journal › Letter, comment/opinion or interview › peer-review

Abstract

This Letter to the Editor is a reply to Mohammed et al. (2021) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsisyn.2021.100145, which in turn is a response to Morrison et al. (2020) “Vacuous standards – subversion of the OSAC standards-development process” https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsisyn.2020.06.005.

Original language	English
Article number	100149
Journal	Forensic Science International: Synergy
Volume	3
Early online date	3 May 2021
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsisyn.2021.100149
Publication status	Published - 2021

Bibliographical note

Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)

Keywords

Forensic science
Method validation
Quality management
Standard
Validation

Access to Document

10.1016/j.fsisyn.2021.100149Licence: CC BY-NC-ND 3.0

Cite this

Morrison, G. S., Neumann, C., Geoghegan, P. H., Edmond, G., Grant, T., Ostrum, R. B., Roberts, P., Saks, M., Syndercombe Court, D., Thompson, W. C., & Zabell, S. (2021). Reply to Response to Vacuous standards – subversion of the OSAC standards-development process. Forensic Science International: Synergy, 3, Article 100149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsisyn.2021.100149

@article{7cf6dac0de66452781d55af9ac52891b,

title = "Reply to Response to Vacuous standards – subversion of the OSAC standards-development process",

abstract = "This Letter to the Editor is a reply to Mohammed et al. (2021) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsisyn.2021.100145, which in turn is a response to Morrison et al. (2020) “Vacuous standards – subversion of the OSAC standards-development process” https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsisyn.2020.06.005.",

keywords = "Forensic science, Method validation, Quality management, Standard, Validation",

author = "Morrison, {Geoffrey Stewart} and Cedric Neumann and Geoghegan, {Patrick Henry} and Gary Edmond and Tim Grant and Ostrum, {R. Brent} and Paul Roberts and Michael Saks and {Syndercombe Court}, Denise and Thompson, {William C.} and Sandy Zabell",

note = "Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)",

year = "2021",

doi = "10.1016/j.fsisyn.2021.100149",

language = "English",

volume = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reply to Response to Vacuous standards – subversion of the OSAC standards-development process

AU - Morrison, Geoffrey Stewart

AU - Neumann, Cedric

AU - Geoghegan, Patrick Henry

AU - Edmond, Gary

AU - Grant, Tim

AU - Ostrum, R. Brent

AU - Roberts, Paul

AU - Saks, Michael

AU - Syndercombe Court, Denise

AU - Thompson, William C.

AU - Zabell, Sandy

N1 - Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)

PY - 2021

Y1 - 2021

N2 - This Letter to the Editor is a reply to Mohammed et al. (2021) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsisyn.2021.100145, which in turn is a response to Morrison et al. (2020) “Vacuous standards – subversion of the OSAC standards-development process” https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsisyn.2020.06.005.

AB - This Letter to the Editor is a reply to Mohammed et al. (2021) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsisyn.2021.100145, which in turn is a response to Morrison et al. (2020) “Vacuous standards – subversion of the OSAC standards-development process” https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsisyn.2020.06.005.

KW - Forensic science

KW - Method validation

KW - Quality management

KW - Standard

KW - Validation

UR - https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589871X21000176?via%3Dihub

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85105963920&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.fsisyn.2021.100149

DO - 10.1016/j.fsisyn.2021.100149

M3 - Letter, comment/opinion or interview

SN - 2589-871X

VL - 3

JO - Forensic Science International: Synergy

JF - Forensic Science International: Synergy

M1 - 100149

ER -

Reply to Response to Vacuous standards – subversion of the OSAC standards-development process

Abstract

Bibliographical note

Keywords

Access to Document

Other files and links

Embargoed Document

Fingerprint

Cite this