Reply to Response to Vacuous standards – subversion of the OSAC standards-development process

Geoffrey Stewart Morrison; Cedric Neumann; Patrick Henry Geoghegan; Gary Edmond; Tim Grant; R. Brent Ostrum; Paul Roberts; Michael Saks; Denise Syndercombe Court; William C. Thompson; Sandy Zabell

doi:10.1016/j.fsisyn.2021.100149

Reply to Response to Vacuous standards – subversion of the OSAC standards-development process

Geoffrey Stewart Morrison
, Cedric Neumann
, Patrick Henry Geoghegan
, Gary Edmond
, Tim Grant
, R. Brent Ostrum
, Paul Roberts
, Michael Saks
, Denise Syndercombe Court
, William C. Thompson
, Sandy Zabell

Research output: Contribution to journal › Letter, comment/opinion or interview › peer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This Letter to the Editor is a reply to Mohammed et al. (2021) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsisyn.2021.100145, which in turn is a response to Morrison et al. (2020) “Vacuous standards – subversion of the OSAC standards-development process” https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsisyn.2020.06.005.

Original language	English
Article number	100149
Journal	Forensic Science International: Synergy
Volume	3
Early online date	3 May 2021
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsisyn.2021.100149
Publication status	Published - 2021

Bibliographical note

Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)

Keywords

Forensic science
Method validation
Quality management
Standard
Validation

Access to Document

10.1016/j.fsisyn.2021.100149Licence: CC BY-NC-ND 3.0

Cite this

Morrison, G. S., Neumann, C., Geoghegan, P. H., Edmond, G., Grant, T., Ostrum, R. B., Roberts, P., Saks, M., Syndercombe Court, D., Thompson, W. C., & Zabell, S. (2021). Reply to Response to Vacuous standards – subversion of the OSAC standards-development process. Forensic Science International: Synergy, 3, Article 100149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsisyn.2021.100149

@article{7cf6dac0de66452781d55af9ac52891b,

title = "Reply to Response to Vacuous standards – subversion of the OSAC standards-development process",

abstract = "This Letter to the Editor is a reply to Mohammed et al. (2021) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsisyn.2021.100145, which in turn is a response to Morrison et al. (2020) “Vacuous standards – subversion of the OSAC standards-development process” https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsisyn.2020.06.005.",

keywords = "Forensic science, Method validation, Quality management, Standard, Validation",

author = "Morrison, \{Geoffrey Stewart\} and Cedric Neumann and Geoghegan, \{Patrick Henry\} and Gary Edmond and Tim Grant and Ostrum, \{R. Brent\} and Paul Roberts and Michael Saks and \{Syndercombe Court\}, Denise and Thompson, \{William C.\} and Sandy Zabell",

note = "Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)",

year = "2021",

doi = "10.1016/j.fsisyn.2021.100149",

language = "English",

volume = "3",

journal = "Forensic Science International: Synergy",

issn = "2589-871X",

publisher = "Elsevier",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reply to Response to Vacuous standards – subversion of the OSAC standards-development process

AU - Morrison, Geoffrey Stewart

AU - Neumann, Cedric

AU - Geoghegan, Patrick Henry

AU - Edmond, Gary

AU - Grant, Tim

AU - Ostrum, R. Brent

AU - Roberts, Paul

AU - Saks, Michael

AU - Syndercombe Court, Denise

AU - Thompson, William C.

AU - Zabell, Sandy

N1 - Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)

PY - 2021

Y1 - 2021

N2 - This Letter to the Editor is a reply to Mohammed et al. (2021) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsisyn.2021.100145, which in turn is a response to Morrison et al. (2020) “Vacuous standards – subversion of the OSAC standards-development process” https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsisyn.2020.06.005.

AB - This Letter to the Editor is a reply to Mohammed et al. (2021) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsisyn.2021.100145, which in turn is a response to Morrison et al. (2020) “Vacuous standards – subversion of the OSAC standards-development process” https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsisyn.2020.06.005.

KW - Forensic science

KW - Method validation

KW - Quality management

KW - Standard

KW - Validation

UR - https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589871X21000176?via%3Dihub

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85105963920

U2 - 10.1016/j.fsisyn.2021.100149

DO - 10.1016/j.fsisyn.2021.100149

M3 - Letter, comment/opinion or interview

SN - 2589-871X

VL - 3

JO - Forensic Science International: Synergy

JF - Forensic Science International: Synergy

M1 - 100149

ER -

Reply to Response to Vacuous standards – subversion of the OSAC standards-development process

Abstract

Bibliographical note

Keywords

Access to Document

Other files and links

Embargoed Document

Fingerprint

Cite this