Resolution of disputes arising from major infrastructure projects in developing countries

Joseph Mante*, Issaka Ndekugri, Nii Ankrah

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Abstract

Multilateral Development Banks including the World Bank have identified infrastructure development as a crucial component of any poverty alleviation strategy in developing countries. The last two decades have seen tremendous increase in the percentage of resources developing countries have invested in infrastructure development. About £755 million was committed to private-public infrastructure development in the developing world between 1990 and 2001. Unfortunately, as exemplified by the Dam Construction Project in Lesotho, disputes often arise from major infrastructure projects in the developing world that are resolved at great cost by courts and arbitral tribunals constituted from the most expensive legal professionals in the developed world. This research presents a critical review of the literature on the experience of such disputes and the methods used in resolving them. It derives from the preliminary phase of a study aimed at developing the knowledge and understanding necessary for more cost effective resolution of such disputes. The key findings of the review so far are as follows. What literature exists is limited largely to resolution by international commercial arbitration. As to be expected of the size of these projects, governments or state entities are often parties to the underlying contract and, therefore, the disputes from the projects. In the overwhelming majority cases, the parties from developing countries are often the respondents and rarely the claimants. There is a perception that developing countries are always at a considerable disadvantage in the conduct of arbitration proceedings, which is a source of disaffection with the process on the part of these States. However, what is most remarkable about the literature is that, although there is a rapidly growing use of alternative dispute resolution (ADR) methods other than arbitration to resolve similar disputes in the developed world, the literature is silent on the use of such methods on projects in developing countries. The paper also considers the implications of the findings of the review for the design of the study.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationCOBRA 2011 - Proceedings of RICS Construction and Property Conference
Pages104-116
Number of pages13
Publication statusPublished - 1 Dec 2011
EventRoyal Institution of Chartered Surveyors International Research Conference, COBRA 2011 - Salford, United Kingdom
Duration: 12 Sep 201113 Sep 2011

Conference

ConferenceRoyal Institution of Chartered Surveyors International Research Conference, COBRA 2011
CountryUnited Kingdom
CitySalford
Period12/09/1113/09/11

Fingerprint

Developing countries
Dams
Costs

Keywords

  • Case study research
  • Developing countries
  • Disputes resolution
  • Infrastructure
  • International

Cite this

Mante, J., Ndekugri, I., & Ankrah, N. (2011). Resolution of disputes arising from major infrastructure projects in developing countries. In COBRA 2011 - Proceedings of RICS Construction and Property Conference (pp. 104-116)
Mante, Joseph ; Ndekugri, Issaka ; Ankrah, Nii. / Resolution of disputes arising from major infrastructure projects in developing countries. COBRA 2011 - Proceedings of RICS Construction and Property Conference. 2011. pp. 104-116
@inproceedings{211a7026a9004f638182d0ab0533605a,
title = "Resolution of disputes arising from major infrastructure projects in developing countries",
abstract = "Multilateral Development Banks including the World Bank have identified infrastructure development as a crucial component of any poverty alleviation strategy in developing countries. The last two decades have seen tremendous increase in the percentage of resources developing countries have invested in infrastructure development. About £755 million was committed to private-public infrastructure development in the developing world between 1990 and 2001. Unfortunately, as exemplified by the Dam Construction Project in Lesotho, disputes often arise from major infrastructure projects in the developing world that are resolved at great cost by courts and arbitral tribunals constituted from the most expensive legal professionals in the developed world. This research presents a critical review of the literature on the experience of such disputes and the methods used in resolving them. It derives from the preliminary phase of a study aimed at developing the knowledge and understanding necessary for more cost effective resolution of such disputes. The key findings of the review so far are as follows. What literature exists is limited largely to resolution by international commercial arbitration. As to be expected of the size of these projects, governments or state entities are often parties to the underlying contract and, therefore, the disputes from the projects. In the overwhelming majority cases, the parties from developing countries are often the respondents and rarely the claimants. There is a perception that developing countries are always at a considerable disadvantage in the conduct of arbitration proceedings, which is a source of disaffection with the process on the part of these States. However, what is most remarkable about the literature is that, although there is a rapidly growing use of alternative dispute resolution (ADR) methods other than arbitration to resolve similar disputes in the developed world, the literature is silent on the use of such methods on projects in developing countries. The paper also considers the implications of the findings of the review for the design of the study.",
keywords = "Case study research, Developing countries, Disputes resolution, Infrastructure, International",
author = "Joseph Mante and Issaka Ndekugri and Nii Ankrah",
year = "2011",
month = "12",
day = "1",
language = "English",
isbn = "9781907842191",
pages = "104--116",
booktitle = "COBRA 2011 - Proceedings of RICS Construction and Property Conference",

}

Mante, J, Ndekugri, I & Ankrah, N 2011, Resolution of disputes arising from major infrastructure projects in developing countries. in COBRA 2011 - Proceedings of RICS Construction and Property Conference. pp. 104-116, Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors International Research Conference, COBRA 2011, Salford, United Kingdom, 12/09/11.

Resolution of disputes arising from major infrastructure projects in developing countries. / Mante, Joseph; Ndekugri, Issaka; Ankrah, Nii.

COBRA 2011 - Proceedings of RICS Construction and Property Conference. 2011. p. 104-116.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

TY - GEN

T1 - Resolution of disputes arising from major infrastructure projects in developing countries

AU - Mante, Joseph

AU - Ndekugri, Issaka

AU - Ankrah, Nii

PY - 2011/12/1

Y1 - 2011/12/1

N2 - Multilateral Development Banks including the World Bank have identified infrastructure development as a crucial component of any poverty alleviation strategy in developing countries. The last two decades have seen tremendous increase in the percentage of resources developing countries have invested in infrastructure development. About £755 million was committed to private-public infrastructure development in the developing world between 1990 and 2001. Unfortunately, as exemplified by the Dam Construction Project in Lesotho, disputes often arise from major infrastructure projects in the developing world that are resolved at great cost by courts and arbitral tribunals constituted from the most expensive legal professionals in the developed world. This research presents a critical review of the literature on the experience of such disputes and the methods used in resolving them. It derives from the preliminary phase of a study aimed at developing the knowledge and understanding necessary for more cost effective resolution of such disputes. The key findings of the review so far are as follows. What literature exists is limited largely to resolution by international commercial arbitration. As to be expected of the size of these projects, governments or state entities are often parties to the underlying contract and, therefore, the disputes from the projects. In the overwhelming majority cases, the parties from developing countries are often the respondents and rarely the claimants. There is a perception that developing countries are always at a considerable disadvantage in the conduct of arbitration proceedings, which is a source of disaffection with the process on the part of these States. However, what is most remarkable about the literature is that, although there is a rapidly growing use of alternative dispute resolution (ADR) methods other than arbitration to resolve similar disputes in the developed world, the literature is silent on the use of such methods on projects in developing countries. The paper also considers the implications of the findings of the review for the design of the study.

AB - Multilateral Development Banks including the World Bank have identified infrastructure development as a crucial component of any poverty alleviation strategy in developing countries. The last two decades have seen tremendous increase in the percentage of resources developing countries have invested in infrastructure development. About £755 million was committed to private-public infrastructure development in the developing world between 1990 and 2001. Unfortunately, as exemplified by the Dam Construction Project in Lesotho, disputes often arise from major infrastructure projects in the developing world that are resolved at great cost by courts and arbitral tribunals constituted from the most expensive legal professionals in the developed world. This research presents a critical review of the literature on the experience of such disputes and the methods used in resolving them. It derives from the preliminary phase of a study aimed at developing the knowledge and understanding necessary for more cost effective resolution of such disputes. The key findings of the review so far are as follows. What literature exists is limited largely to resolution by international commercial arbitration. As to be expected of the size of these projects, governments or state entities are often parties to the underlying contract and, therefore, the disputes from the projects. In the overwhelming majority cases, the parties from developing countries are often the respondents and rarely the claimants. There is a perception that developing countries are always at a considerable disadvantage in the conduct of arbitration proceedings, which is a source of disaffection with the process on the part of these States. However, what is most remarkable about the literature is that, although there is a rapidly growing use of alternative dispute resolution (ADR) methods other than arbitration to resolve similar disputes in the developed world, the literature is silent on the use of such methods on projects in developing countries. The paper also considers the implications of the findings of the review for the design of the study.

KW - Case study research

KW - Developing countries

KW - Disputes resolution

KW - Infrastructure

KW - International

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84874986262&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Conference contribution

AN - SCOPUS:84874986262

SN - 9781907842191

SP - 104

EP - 116

BT - COBRA 2011 - Proceedings of RICS Construction and Property Conference

ER -

Mante J, Ndekugri I, Ankrah N. Resolution of disputes arising from major infrastructure projects in developing countries. In COBRA 2011 - Proceedings of RICS Construction and Property Conference. 2011. p. 104-116