TY - JOUR
T1 - Review of tennis ball aerodynamics
AU - Mehta, Rabindra
AU - Alam, Firoz
AU - Subic, Aleksandar
PY - 2008
Y1 - 2008
N2 - The aerodynamics of a tennis ball are reviewed here with reference to several wind tunnel measurement efforts. Measurements for a wide variety of tennis balls, including the ‘oversized’ balls, are presented. Flow visualization results have shown that the separation location on a non‐spinning tennis ball occurred relatively early, near the apex, and appeared very similar to a laminar separation in the subcritical Reynolds number regime. The flow regime (boundary layer separation location) appears to be independent of Reynolds number in the range, 167,000 < Re < 284,000. Asymmetric boundary layer separation and a deflected wake flow, depicting the Magnus effect, have been observed for the spinning ball. Aerodynamic force (drag and lift) measurements for nonspinning and spinning balls are reviewed for a wide range of Reynolds numbers and spin rates. Relatively high drag coefficients (CD ≅ 0.6 to 0.7), have been measured for new nonspinning tennis balls. The observed (unexpected) behavior of the tennis ball drag coefficient is explained in terms of a flow model that includes the drag contribution of the fuzz’ elements.
AB - The aerodynamics of a tennis ball are reviewed here with reference to several wind tunnel measurement efforts. Measurements for a wide variety of tennis balls, including the ‘oversized’ balls, are presented. Flow visualization results have shown that the separation location on a non‐spinning tennis ball occurred relatively early, near the apex, and appeared very similar to a laminar separation in the subcritical Reynolds number regime. The flow regime (boundary layer separation location) appears to be independent of Reynolds number in the range, 167,000 < Re < 284,000. Asymmetric boundary layer separation and a deflected wake flow, depicting the Magnus effect, have been observed for the spinning ball. Aerodynamic force (drag and lift) measurements for nonspinning and spinning balls are reviewed for a wide range of Reynolds numbers and spin rates. Relatively high drag coefficients (CD ≅ 0.6 to 0.7), have been measured for new nonspinning tennis balls. The observed (unexpected) behavior of the tennis ball drag coefficient is explained in terms of a flow model that includes the drag contribution of the fuzz’ elements.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85008815197&doi=10.1080%2f19346182.2008.9648446&partnerID=40&md5=4ad8359373e7d4ef8f7e47e657315a7e
UR - https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/19346182.2008.9648446
U2 - 10.1080/19346182.2008.9648446
DO - 10.1080/19346182.2008.9648446
M3 - Review article
VL - 1
SP - 7
EP - 16
JO - Sports Technology
JF - Sports Technology
IS - 1
ER -