Abstract
We report the performance of a neurologically impaired patient, KE, whose frequent errors in reading, writing, naming, and comprehension were nearly always semantically related to the target response. To quantify this pattern, a large number of items were presented for tasks of verbal and written naming, oral reading, writing to dictation, word/picture matching, and naming from tactile exploration. Detailed analyses of his performance on these tasks show very similar rates and types of errors, regardless of the modality of stimulus or response. KE, s homogeneous pattern of semantic errors across modalities is interpreted as evidence for selective damage to a semantic system common to all lexical processes. In addition, although KE demonstrated some spared knowledge of all items in response to picture stimuli, we were able to interpret all aspects of his performance without resorting to a proposal that there are modality-specific semantic systems. Finally, we show that our interpretation, which assumes a unitary, modality-independent semantic system, can also account for previously reported cases in the cognitive neuropsychology literature that have been taken as evidence for modality-specific semantic systems.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 191-243 |
| Number of pages | 53 |
| Journal | Cognitive Neuropsychology |
| Volume | 7 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 May 1990 |
Funding
The research reported in this paper was supported by N.I.H. grants NS22201 and NS23836 and by a grant from the Seaver Institute to Alfonso Caramazza. The authors wish to thank Tim Shallice for his comments on the results reported here, and Argye I. Hillis for her advice on statistical analyses. We also thank Max Coltheart and three anonymous referees for their helpful comments on an earlier version of the paper. We are especially grateful to KE for his participation in this study.
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Selective impairment of semantics in lexical processing'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver