Similarity and confidence in artificial grammar learning

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Three experiments examined the relationship between similarity ratings and confidence ratings in artificial grammar learning. In Experiment 1 participants rated the similarity of test items to study exemplars. Regression analyses revealed these to be related to some of the objective measures of similarity that have previously been implicated in categorization decisions. In Experiment 2 participants made grammaticality decisions and rated either their confidence in the accuracy of their decisions or the similarity of the test items to the study items. Regression analyses showed that the grammaticality decisions were predicted by the similarity ratings obtained in Experiment 1. Points on the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves for the similarity and confidence ratings were closely matched. These data suggest that meta-cognitive judgments of confidence are predicated on structural knowledge of similarity. Experiment 3 confirmed this by showing that confidence ratings to median similarity probe items changed according to the similarity of preceding items.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)160-168
Number of pages9
JournalExperimental Psychology
Volume57
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 26 Mar 2010

Fingerprint

Regression Analysis
Learning
ROC Curve
Confidence
Artificial Grammar Learning
Rating
Experiment

Keywords

  • Confidence
  • Implicit learning
  • Signal detection theory
  • Similarity

Cite this

Tunney, Richard J. / Similarity and confidence in artificial grammar learning. In: Experimental Psychology. 2010 ; Vol. 57, No. 2. pp. 160-168.
@article{a7a2acbc45aa4bc183e5880cb8423041,
title = "Similarity and confidence in artificial grammar learning",
abstract = "Three experiments examined the relationship between similarity ratings and confidence ratings in artificial grammar learning. In Experiment 1 participants rated the similarity of test items to study exemplars. Regression analyses revealed these to be related to some of the objective measures of similarity that have previously been implicated in categorization decisions. In Experiment 2 participants made grammaticality decisions and rated either their confidence in the accuracy of their decisions or the similarity of the test items to the study items. Regression analyses showed that the grammaticality decisions were predicted by the similarity ratings obtained in Experiment 1. Points on the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves for the similarity and confidence ratings were closely matched. These data suggest that meta-cognitive judgments of confidence are predicated on structural knowledge of similarity. Experiment 3 confirmed this by showing that confidence ratings to median similarity probe items changed according to the similarity of preceding items.",
keywords = "Confidence, Implicit learning, Signal detection theory, Similarity",
author = "Tunney, {Richard J.}",
year = "2010",
month = "3",
day = "26",
doi = "10.1027/1618-3169/a000020",
language = "English",
volume = "57",
pages = "160--168",
number = "2",

}

Similarity and confidence in artificial grammar learning. / Tunney, Richard J.

In: Experimental Psychology, Vol. 57, No. 2, 26.03.2010, p. 160-168.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Similarity and confidence in artificial grammar learning

AU - Tunney, Richard J.

PY - 2010/3/26

Y1 - 2010/3/26

N2 - Three experiments examined the relationship between similarity ratings and confidence ratings in artificial grammar learning. In Experiment 1 participants rated the similarity of test items to study exemplars. Regression analyses revealed these to be related to some of the objective measures of similarity that have previously been implicated in categorization decisions. In Experiment 2 participants made grammaticality decisions and rated either their confidence in the accuracy of their decisions or the similarity of the test items to the study items. Regression analyses showed that the grammaticality decisions were predicted by the similarity ratings obtained in Experiment 1. Points on the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves for the similarity and confidence ratings were closely matched. These data suggest that meta-cognitive judgments of confidence are predicated on structural knowledge of similarity. Experiment 3 confirmed this by showing that confidence ratings to median similarity probe items changed according to the similarity of preceding items.

AB - Three experiments examined the relationship between similarity ratings and confidence ratings in artificial grammar learning. In Experiment 1 participants rated the similarity of test items to study exemplars. Regression analyses revealed these to be related to some of the objective measures of similarity that have previously been implicated in categorization decisions. In Experiment 2 participants made grammaticality decisions and rated either their confidence in the accuracy of their decisions or the similarity of the test items to the study items. Regression analyses showed that the grammaticality decisions were predicted by the similarity ratings obtained in Experiment 1. Points on the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves for the similarity and confidence ratings were closely matched. These data suggest that meta-cognitive judgments of confidence are predicated on structural knowledge of similarity. Experiment 3 confirmed this by showing that confidence ratings to median similarity probe items changed according to the similarity of preceding items.

KW - Confidence

KW - Implicit learning

KW - Signal detection theory

KW - Similarity

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77949745909&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - https://econtent.hogrefe.com/doi/10.1027/1618-3169/a000020

U2 - 10.1027/1618-3169/a000020

DO - 10.1027/1618-3169/a000020

M3 - Article

C2 - 20178925

AN - SCOPUS:77949745909

VL - 57

SP - 160

EP - 168

IS - 2

ER -