Simulate and compare routing protocols for smart green systems

Victor Chang*, Anusha Kamireddy, Qianwen Xu, Jie Li, Charalampos Psarros, Perk Lin Chong

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

This paper aims to investigate different routing protocols and compares network protocols, including IGRP, RIP, BGP, etc. on key metrics and identified predominant routing protocols. In order to implement the comparison of different routing protocols for smart green systems (RPSGSs), a network has been deployed with a Cisco packet tracer. Furthermore, the commands related to respective routing protocols are selected and used in CLI mode to configure the network. Cisco packet tracer is used since it provides a user-friendly interface on which users can drag and drop many devices to connect together to perform the configuration. The comparative analysis results suggest that EIGRP is a suitable routing protocol for the network that uses Cisco devices and OSPF is the most efficient routing protocol that can be used to transfer the packet from source to destination. RPSGSs allow datagrams to travel in the shortest path throughout the network.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)302-329
Number of pages28
JournalInternational Journal of Business and Systems Research
Volume16
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 4 Mar 2022

Bibliographical note

Copyright © 2022 Inderscience Enterprises Ltd.

Funding Information:
This work is partly supported by VC Research (VCR 0000047).

Keywords

  • network protocols
  • open shortest path first
  • OSPF
  • RIPv2
  • routing information protocol version 2
  • routing protocols for smart green systems
  • RPSGSs
  • systems

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Simulate and compare routing protocols for smart green systems'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this