Social identities and commitments at work; toward an integrative model

John P. Meyer*, Thomas E. Becker, Rolf Van Dick

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Although social identities and work-related commitment are important aspects of employee attachment, distinctions between and relations among the two have not been clearly articulated. In this conceptual piece, we propose that identity and commitment are distinguishable in terms of their essential meaning, foci of attachment, mindsets, volitionality, and behavioral implications. We further suggest that situated and deep structure social identities are differentially antecedent to exchange-based and value-based commitments, and that commitment mediates, at least partially, the effects of identities on motivation and work behavior. Finally, we consider the implications of multiple identities for employees in different kinds of collectives (nested and cross-cutting).

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)665-683
Number of pages19
JournalJournal of Organizational Behavior
Volume27
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Aug 2006

Fingerprint

Social Identification
commitment
Social Work
Motivation
employee
social structure
Social identity
Integrative model
Values
Employees

Cite this

Meyer, John P. ; Becker, Thomas E. ; Van Dick, Rolf. / Social identities and commitments at work; toward an integrative model. In: Journal of Organizational Behavior. 2006 ; Vol. 27, No. 5. pp. 665-683.
@article{01fb994ff8914642b6d30f821b75fd7d,
title = "Social identities and commitments at work; toward an integrative model",
abstract = "Although social identities and work-related commitment are important aspects of employee attachment, distinctions between and relations among the two have not been clearly articulated. In this conceptual piece, we propose that identity and commitment are distinguishable in terms of their essential meaning, foci of attachment, mindsets, volitionality, and behavioral implications. We further suggest that situated and deep structure social identities are differentially antecedent to exchange-based and value-based commitments, and that commitment mediates, at least partially, the effects of identities on motivation and work behavior. Finally, we consider the implications of multiple identities for employees in different kinds of collectives (nested and cross-cutting).",
author = "Meyer, {John P.} and Becker, {Thomas E.} and {Van Dick}, Rolf",
year = "2006",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/job.383",
language = "English",
volume = "27",
pages = "665--683",
journal = "Journal of Organizational Behavior",
issn = "0894-3796",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Ltd",
number = "5",

}

Social identities and commitments at work; toward an integrative model. / Meyer, John P.; Becker, Thomas E.; Van Dick, Rolf.

In: Journal of Organizational Behavior, Vol. 27, No. 5, 01.08.2006, p. 665-683.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Social identities and commitments at work; toward an integrative model

AU - Meyer, John P.

AU - Becker, Thomas E.

AU - Van Dick, Rolf

PY - 2006/8/1

Y1 - 2006/8/1

N2 - Although social identities and work-related commitment are important aspects of employee attachment, distinctions between and relations among the two have not been clearly articulated. In this conceptual piece, we propose that identity and commitment are distinguishable in terms of their essential meaning, foci of attachment, mindsets, volitionality, and behavioral implications. We further suggest that situated and deep structure social identities are differentially antecedent to exchange-based and value-based commitments, and that commitment mediates, at least partially, the effects of identities on motivation and work behavior. Finally, we consider the implications of multiple identities for employees in different kinds of collectives (nested and cross-cutting).

AB - Although social identities and work-related commitment are important aspects of employee attachment, distinctions between and relations among the two have not been clearly articulated. In this conceptual piece, we propose that identity and commitment are distinguishable in terms of their essential meaning, foci of attachment, mindsets, volitionality, and behavioral implications. We further suggest that situated and deep structure social identities are differentially antecedent to exchange-based and value-based commitments, and that commitment mediates, at least partially, the effects of identities on motivation and work behavior. Finally, we consider the implications of multiple identities for employees in different kinds of collectives (nested and cross-cutting).

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33746290191&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/job.383

U2 - 10.1002/job.383

DO - 10.1002/job.383

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:33746290191

VL - 27

SP - 665

EP - 683

JO - Journal of Organizational Behavior

JF - Journal of Organizational Behavior

SN - 0894-3796

IS - 5

ER -