Spatial and temporal dependencies of cross-orientation suppression in human vision.

Timothy S. Meese*, David J. Holmes

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

A well-known property of orientation-tuned neurons in the visual cortex is that they are suppressed by the superposition of an orthogonal mask. This phenomenon has been explained in terms of physiological constraints (synaptic depression), engineering solutions for components with poor dynamic range (contrast normalization) and fundamental coding strategies for natural images (redundancy reduction). A common but often tacit assumption is that the suppressive process is equally potent at different spatial and temporal scales of analysis. To determine whether it is so, we measured psychophysical cross-orientation masking (XOM) functions for flickering horizontal Gabor stimuli over wide ranges of spatio-temporal frequency and contrast. We found that orthogonal masks raised contrast detection thresholds substantially at low spatial frequencies and high temporal frequencies (high speeds), and that small and unexpected levels of facilitation were evident elsewhere. The data were well fit by a functional model of contrast gain control, where (i) the weight of suppression increased with the ratio of temporal to spatial frequency and (ii) the weight of facilitatory modulation was the same for all conditions, but outcompeted by suppression at higher contrasts. These results (i) provide new constraints for models of primary visual cortex, (ii) associate XOM and facilitation with the transient magno- and sustained parvostreams, respectively, and (iii) reconcile earlier conflicting psychophysical reports on XOM.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)127-136
Number of pages10
JournalProceeding of the Royal Society: Series B
Volume274
Issue number1606
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 7 Jan 2007

Fingerprint

Spatial Analysis
facilitation
Masks
Flickering
Visual Cortex
Gain control
Spatio-Temporal Analysis
Neurons
Redundancy
Weights and Measures
Modulation
engineering
detection limit
neurons
speed
detection
normalisation
analysis
visual cortex

Keywords

  • contrast gain control
  • cross-orientation inhibition
  • human vision
  • masking
  • psychophysics

Cite this

@article{aee6961951be4468a133fc01404d244f,
title = "Spatial and temporal dependencies of cross-orientation suppression in human vision.",
abstract = "A well-known property of orientation-tuned neurons in the visual cortex is that they are suppressed by the superposition of an orthogonal mask. This phenomenon has been explained in terms of physiological constraints (synaptic depression), engineering solutions for components with poor dynamic range (contrast normalization) and fundamental coding strategies for natural images (redundancy reduction). A common but often tacit assumption is that the suppressive process is equally potent at different spatial and temporal scales of analysis. To determine whether it is so, we measured psychophysical cross-orientation masking (XOM) functions for flickering horizontal Gabor stimuli over wide ranges of spatio-temporal frequency and contrast. We found that orthogonal masks raised contrast detection thresholds substantially at low spatial frequencies and high temporal frequencies (high speeds), and that small and unexpected levels of facilitation were evident elsewhere. The data were well fit by a functional model of contrast gain control, where (i) the weight of suppression increased with the ratio of temporal to spatial frequency and (ii) the weight of facilitatory modulation was the same for all conditions, but outcompeted by suppression at higher contrasts. These results (i) provide new constraints for models of primary visual cortex, (ii) associate XOM and facilitation with the transient magno- and sustained parvostreams, respectively, and (iii) reconcile earlier conflicting psychophysical reports on XOM.",
keywords = "contrast gain control, cross-orientation inhibition, human vision, masking, psychophysics",
author = "Meese, {Timothy S.} and Holmes, {David J.}",
year = "2007",
month = "1",
day = "7",
doi = "10.1098/rspb.2006.3697",
language = "English",
volume = "274",
pages = "127--136",
journal = "Proceeding of the Royal Society: Series B",
issn = "0962-8452",
publisher = "The Royal Society",
number = "1606",

}

Spatial and temporal dependencies of cross-orientation suppression in human vision. / Meese, Timothy S.; Holmes, David J.

In: Proceeding of the Royal Society: Series B, Vol. 274, No. 1606, 07.01.2007, p. 127-136.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Spatial and temporal dependencies of cross-orientation suppression in human vision.

AU - Meese, Timothy S.

AU - Holmes, David J.

PY - 2007/1/7

Y1 - 2007/1/7

N2 - A well-known property of orientation-tuned neurons in the visual cortex is that they are suppressed by the superposition of an orthogonal mask. This phenomenon has been explained in terms of physiological constraints (synaptic depression), engineering solutions for components with poor dynamic range (contrast normalization) and fundamental coding strategies for natural images (redundancy reduction). A common but often tacit assumption is that the suppressive process is equally potent at different spatial and temporal scales of analysis. To determine whether it is so, we measured psychophysical cross-orientation masking (XOM) functions for flickering horizontal Gabor stimuli over wide ranges of spatio-temporal frequency and contrast. We found that orthogonal masks raised contrast detection thresholds substantially at low spatial frequencies and high temporal frequencies (high speeds), and that small and unexpected levels of facilitation were evident elsewhere. The data were well fit by a functional model of contrast gain control, where (i) the weight of suppression increased with the ratio of temporal to spatial frequency and (ii) the weight of facilitatory modulation was the same for all conditions, but outcompeted by suppression at higher contrasts. These results (i) provide new constraints for models of primary visual cortex, (ii) associate XOM and facilitation with the transient magno- and sustained parvostreams, respectively, and (iii) reconcile earlier conflicting psychophysical reports on XOM.

AB - A well-known property of orientation-tuned neurons in the visual cortex is that they are suppressed by the superposition of an orthogonal mask. This phenomenon has been explained in terms of physiological constraints (synaptic depression), engineering solutions for components with poor dynamic range (contrast normalization) and fundamental coding strategies for natural images (redundancy reduction). A common but often tacit assumption is that the suppressive process is equally potent at different spatial and temporal scales of analysis. To determine whether it is so, we measured psychophysical cross-orientation masking (XOM) functions for flickering horizontal Gabor stimuli over wide ranges of spatio-temporal frequency and contrast. We found that orthogonal masks raised contrast detection thresholds substantially at low spatial frequencies and high temporal frequencies (high speeds), and that small and unexpected levels of facilitation were evident elsewhere. The data were well fit by a functional model of contrast gain control, where (i) the weight of suppression increased with the ratio of temporal to spatial frequency and (ii) the weight of facilitatory modulation was the same for all conditions, but outcompeted by suppression at higher contrasts. These results (i) provide new constraints for models of primary visual cortex, (ii) associate XOM and facilitation with the transient magno- and sustained parvostreams, respectively, and (iii) reconcile earlier conflicting psychophysical reports on XOM.

KW - contrast gain control

KW - cross-orientation inhibition

KW - human vision

KW - masking

KW - psychophysics

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=39049194229&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://rspb.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/274/1606/127.abstract

U2 - 10.1098/rspb.2006.3697

DO - 10.1098/rspb.2006.3697

M3 - Article

C2 - 17134997

VL - 274

SP - 127

EP - 136

JO - Proceeding of the Royal Society: Series B

JF - Proceeding of the Royal Society: Series B

SN - 0962-8452

IS - 1606

ER -