Spatial integration within and between first- and second-order stimuli

R. Summers, D.H. Baker, T. Meese

Research output: Contribution to journalMeeting abstract

Abstract

The detection of first-order (luminance-modulated—LM) and second-order (contrast-modulated—CM) stimuli is believed to involve separate mechanisms that interact weakly or are entirely independent; detection of an LM-only stimulus is barely improved by the addition of CM. However, little is known about the integration of stimuli comprising non-overlapping regions of LM and CM. Spatial summation of LM, CM and LM+CM targets was assessed using (i) full 1.25 c deg -1gratings of different sizes (1–16 cycles), (ii) fixed-diameter targets whose signal area was controlled by modulating a large (8 or 16 cycles) ‘full’ grating with a raised plaid pattern. The noise carrier (also present for LM stimuli) was bandpass-filtered white noise (8 c deg -1, ±0.5 octaves). We find that sensitivity improves with target size more rapidly for LM than for CM. When area was constant, comparing full and modulated stimuli yielded summation of ∼5dB for both CM and LM. We also investigated cross-order summation, which was weak (∼2dB) for full CM+LM (threshold adjusted) stimuli, but stronger (∼3dB) when first and second order stimuli were interdigitated over area. This suggests a mechanism capable of integrating textures with attributes that vary over space, perhaps owing to changes in illumination or material properties.
Original languageEnglish
Article number153
Pages (from-to)223
Number of pages1
JournalPerception
Volume41
Issue numberSuppl.1
Publication statusPublished - Sep 2012
Event35th European Conference on Visual Perception - Alghero, Italy
Duration: 2 Sep 20126 Sep 2012

Fingerprint

White noise
Lighting
Noise
Luminance
Materials properties
Textures

Bibliographical note

ECVP 2012 Abstracts

Cite this

Summers, R., Baker, D. H., & Meese, T. (2012). Spatial integration within and between first- and second-order stimuli. Perception, 41(Suppl.1), 223. [153].
Summers, R. ; Baker, D.H. ; Meese, T. / Spatial integration within and between first- and second-order stimuli. In: Perception. 2012 ; Vol. 41, No. Suppl.1. pp. 223.
@article{60714015a812415c96980125e90d0f4a,
title = "Spatial integration within and between first- and second-order stimuli",
abstract = "The detection of first-order (luminance-modulated—LM) and second-order (contrast-modulated—CM) stimuli is believed to involve separate mechanisms that interact weakly or are entirely independent; detection of an LM-only stimulus is barely improved by the addition of CM. However, little is known about the integration of stimuli comprising non-overlapping regions of LM and CM. Spatial summation of LM, CM and LM+CM targets was assessed using (i) full 1.25 c deg -1gratings of different sizes (1–16 cycles), (ii) fixed-diameter targets whose signal area was controlled by modulating a large (8 or 16 cycles) ‘full’ grating with a raised plaid pattern. The noise carrier (also present for LM stimuli) was bandpass-filtered white noise (8 c deg -1, ±0.5 octaves). We find that sensitivity improves with target size more rapidly for LM than for CM. When area was constant, comparing full and modulated stimuli yielded summation of ∼5dB for both CM and LM. We also investigated cross-order summation, which was weak (∼2dB) for full CM+LM (threshold adjusted) stimuli, but stronger (∼3dB) when first and second order stimuli were interdigitated over area. This suggests a mechanism capable of integrating textures with attributes that vary over space, perhaps owing to changes in illumination or material properties.",
author = "R. Summers and D.H. Baker and T. Meese",
note = "ECVP 2012 Abstracts",
year = "2012",
month = "9",
language = "English",
volume = "41",
pages = "223",
journal = "Perception",
issn = "0301-0066",
publisher = "Pion Ltd.",
number = "Suppl.1",

}

Summers, R, Baker, DH & Meese, T 2012, 'Spatial integration within and between first- and second-order stimuli', Perception, vol. 41, no. Suppl.1, 153, pp. 223.

Spatial integration within and between first- and second-order stimuli. / Summers, R.; Baker, D.H.; Meese, T.

In: Perception, Vol. 41, No. Suppl.1, 153, 09.2012, p. 223.

Research output: Contribution to journalMeeting abstract

TY - JOUR

T1 - Spatial integration within and between first- and second-order stimuli

AU - Summers, R.

AU - Baker, D.H.

AU - Meese, T.

N1 - ECVP 2012 Abstracts

PY - 2012/9

Y1 - 2012/9

N2 - The detection of first-order (luminance-modulated—LM) and second-order (contrast-modulated—CM) stimuli is believed to involve separate mechanisms that interact weakly or are entirely independent; detection of an LM-only stimulus is barely improved by the addition of CM. However, little is known about the integration of stimuli comprising non-overlapping regions of LM and CM. Spatial summation of LM, CM and LM+CM targets was assessed using (i) full 1.25 c deg -1gratings of different sizes (1–16 cycles), (ii) fixed-diameter targets whose signal area was controlled by modulating a large (8 or 16 cycles) ‘full’ grating with a raised plaid pattern. The noise carrier (also present for LM stimuli) was bandpass-filtered white noise (8 c deg -1, ±0.5 octaves). We find that sensitivity improves with target size more rapidly for LM than for CM. When area was constant, comparing full and modulated stimuli yielded summation of ∼5dB for both CM and LM. We also investigated cross-order summation, which was weak (∼2dB) for full CM+LM (threshold adjusted) stimuli, but stronger (∼3dB) when first and second order stimuli were interdigitated over area. This suggests a mechanism capable of integrating textures with attributes that vary over space, perhaps owing to changes in illumination or material properties.

AB - The detection of first-order (luminance-modulated—LM) and second-order (contrast-modulated—CM) stimuli is believed to involve separate mechanisms that interact weakly or are entirely independent; detection of an LM-only stimulus is barely improved by the addition of CM. However, little is known about the integration of stimuli comprising non-overlapping regions of LM and CM. Spatial summation of LM, CM and LM+CM targets was assessed using (i) full 1.25 c deg -1gratings of different sizes (1–16 cycles), (ii) fixed-diameter targets whose signal area was controlled by modulating a large (8 or 16 cycles) ‘full’ grating with a raised plaid pattern. The noise carrier (also present for LM stimuli) was bandpass-filtered white noise (8 c deg -1, ±0.5 octaves). We find that sensitivity improves with target size more rapidly for LM than for CM. When area was constant, comparing full and modulated stimuli yielded summation of ∼5dB for both CM and LM. We also investigated cross-order summation, which was weak (∼2dB) for full CM+LM (threshold adjusted) stimuli, but stronger (∼3dB) when first and second order stimuli were interdigitated over area. This suggests a mechanism capable of integrating textures with attributes that vary over space, perhaps owing to changes in illumination or material properties.

UR - http://pec.sagepub.com/content/41/1_suppl/1

M3 - Meeting abstract

VL - 41

SP - 223

JO - Perception

JF - Perception

SN - 0301-0066

IS - Suppl.1

M1 - 153

ER -