Spatial perspective taking is an embodied process, but not for everyone in the same way: differences predicted by sex and social skills score

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

We re-analysed visuo-spatial perspective taking data from Kessler and Thomson (2010) plus a previously unpublished pilot with respect to individual- and sex differences in embodied processing (defined as body-posture congruence effects). We found that so-called 'systemisers' (males/low-social-skills) showed weaker embodiment than so-called 'embodiers' (females/high-social-skills). We conclude that 'systemisers' either have difficulties with embodied processing or, alternatively, they have a strategic advantage in selecting different mechanisms or the appropriate level of embodiment. In contrast, 'embodiers' have an advantageous strategy of "deep" embodied processing reflecting their urge to empathise or, alternatively, less flexibility in fine-tuning the involvement of bodily representations.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)133-158
Number of pages26
JournalSpatial cognition and computation
Volume12
Issue number2-3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2012

Fingerprint

posture
Sex Characteristics
Embodiment
Processing
Posture
Individuality
Congruence
Tuning
Flexibility
Social Skills
Skills
effect

Keywords

  • embodied social cognition
  • perspective taking
  • sex differences
  • social skills
  • systemiser-empathiser distinction
  • embodiers

Cite this

@article{eee0aa819bd447fb821efc208580d6ee,
title = "Spatial perspective taking is an embodied process, but not for everyone in the same way: differences predicted by sex and social skills score",
abstract = "We re-analysed visuo-spatial perspective taking data from Kessler and Thomson (2010) plus a previously unpublished pilot with respect to individual- and sex differences in embodied processing (defined as body-posture congruence effects). We found that so-called 'systemisers' (males/low-social-skills) showed weaker embodiment than so-called 'embodiers' (females/high-social-skills). We conclude that 'systemisers' either have difficulties with embodied processing or, alternatively, they have a strategic advantage in selecting different mechanisms or the appropriate level of embodiment. In contrast, 'embodiers' have an advantageous strategy of {"}deep{"} embodied processing reflecting their urge to empathise or, alternatively, less flexibility in fine-tuning the involvement of bodily representations.",
keywords = "embodied social cognition, perspective taking, sex differences, social skills, systemiser-empathiser distinction, embodiers",
author = "Klaus Kessler and Hongfang Wang",
year = "2012",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1080/13875868.2011.634533",
language = "English",
volume = "12",
pages = "133--158",
journal = "Spatial cognition and computation",
issn = "1387-5868",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis",
number = "2-3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Spatial perspective taking is an embodied process, but not for everyone in the same way

T2 - differences predicted by sex and social skills score

AU - Kessler, Klaus

AU - Wang, Hongfang

PY - 2012/4

Y1 - 2012/4

N2 - We re-analysed visuo-spatial perspective taking data from Kessler and Thomson (2010) plus a previously unpublished pilot with respect to individual- and sex differences in embodied processing (defined as body-posture congruence effects). We found that so-called 'systemisers' (males/low-social-skills) showed weaker embodiment than so-called 'embodiers' (females/high-social-skills). We conclude that 'systemisers' either have difficulties with embodied processing or, alternatively, they have a strategic advantage in selecting different mechanisms or the appropriate level of embodiment. In contrast, 'embodiers' have an advantageous strategy of "deep" embodied processing reflecting their urge to empathise or, alternatively, less flexibility in fine-tuning the involvement of bodily representations.

AB - We re-analysed visuo-spatial perspective taking data from Kessler and Thomson (2010) plus a previously unpublished pilot with respect to individual- and sex differences in embodied processing (defined as body-posture congruence effects). We found that so-called 'systemisers' (males/low-social-skills) showed weaker embodiment than so-called 'embodiers' (females/high-social-skills). We conclude that 'systemisers' either have difficulties with embodied processing or, alternatively, they have a strategic advantage in selecting different mechanisms or the appropriate level of embodiment. In contrast, 'embodiers' have an advantageous strategy of "deep" embodied processing reflecting their urge to empathise or, alternatively, less flexibility in fine-tuning the involvement of bodily representations.

KW - embodied social cognition

KW - perspective taking

KW - sex differences

KW - social skills

KW - systemiser-empathiser distinction

KW - embodiers

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84860339672&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/13875868.2011.634533

DO - 10.1080/13875868.2011.634533

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84860339672

VL - 12

SP - 133

EP - 158

JO - Spatial cognition and computation

JF - Spatial cognition and computation

SN - 1387-5868

IS - 2-3

ER -