Stakeholder preference and stated vs. derived importance satisfaction research

Steven Greenland, Ian A. Combe, Andrew M. Farrell

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This paper presents a case study that reveals how stakeholders in the research process, by recommending specific data collection and analytical techniques, exert significant ‘hidden’ influence on the decisions made on the basis of market research findings. While disagreements amongst stakeholders regarding research design are likely, the possibility that strategies adopted by companies are dependent upon stakeholder research preferences has not been adequately addressed in the literature. Two widely used quantitative customer satisfaction evaluation approaches, involving stated and derived importance, are compared within a real life market research setting at an international bank. The comparative analysis informs an ongoing debate surrounding the applicability of explicit and implicit importance measures and demonstrates how recommendations are dependent upon the methodological and analytical techniques selected. The findings, therefore, have significant implications for importance based satisfaction market research planning and highlight the need to consider the impact of stakeholder preferences on research outcomes.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)35-55
Number of pages21
JournalInternational Journal of Market Research
Volume58
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2016

Fingerprint

Stakeholders
Market research
Analytical techniques
Comparative analysis
Outcomes research
Customer satisfaction
Process research
Planning
Evaluation
Data collection
Research design

Bibliographical note

© Sage 2016. The final publication is available via Sage at http://dx.doi.org/10.2501/IJMR-2016-005

Cite this

@article{c6670ccf80bf48a1b95a757a5174daaf,
title = "Stakeholder preference and stated vs. derived importance satisfaction research",
abstract = "This paper presents a case study that reveals how stakeholders in the research process, by recommending specific data collection and analytical techniques, exert significant ‘hidden’ influence on the decisions made on the basis of market research findings. While disagreements amongst stakeholders regarding research design are likely, the possibility that strategies adopted by companies are dependent upon stakeholder research preferences has not been adequately addressed in the literature. Two widely used quantitative customer satisfaction evaluation approaches, involving stated and derived importance, are compared within a real life market research setting at an international bank. The comparative analysis informs an ongoing debate surrounding the applicability of explicit and implicit importance measures and demonstrates how recommendations are dependent upon the methodological and analytical techniques selected. The findings, therefore, have significant implications for importance based satisfaction market research planning and highlight the need to consider the impact of stakeholder preferences on research outcomes.",
author = "Steven Greenland and Combe, {Ian A.} and Farrell, {Andrew M.}",
note = "{\circledC} Sage 2016. The final publication is available via Sage at http://dx.doi.org/10.2501/IJMR-2016-005",
year = "2016",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.2501/IJMR-2016-005",
language = "English",
volume = "58",
pages = "35--55",
journal = "International Journal of Market Research",
issn = "1470-7853",
publisher = "Market Research Society",
number = "1",

}

Stakeholder preference and stated vs. derived importance satisfaction research. / Greenland, Steven; Combe, Ian A.; Farrell, Andrew M.

In: International Journal of Market Research, Vol. 58, No. 1, 01.01.2016, p. 35-55.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Stakeholder preference and stated vs. derived importance satisfaction research

AU - Greenland, Steven

AU - Combe, Ian A.

AU - Farrell, Andrew M.

N1 - © Sage 2016. The final publication is available via Sage at http://dx.doi.org/10.2501/IJMR-2016-005

PY - 2016/1/1

Y1 - 2016/1/1

N2 - This paper presents a case study that reveals how stakeholders in the research process, by recommending specific data collection and analytical techniques, exert significant ‘hidden’ influence on the decisions made on the basis of market research findings. While disagreements amongst stakeholders regarding research design are likely, the possibility that strategies adopted by companies are dependent upon stakeholder research preferences has not been adequately addressed in the literature. Two widely used quantitative customer satisfaction evaluation approaches, involving stated and derived importance, are compared within a real life market research setting at an international bank. The comparative analysis informs an ongoing debate surrounding the applicability of explicit and implicit importance measures and demonstrates how recommendations are dependent upon the methodological and analytical techniques selected. The findings, therefore, have significant implications for importance based satisfaction market research planning and highlight the need to consider the impact of stakeholder preferences on research outcomes.

AB - This paper presents a case study that reveals how stakeholders in the research process, by recommending specific data collection and analytical techniques, exert significant ‘hidden’ influence on the decisions made on the basis of market research findings. While disagreements amongst stakeholders regarding research design are likely, the possibility that strategies adopted by companies are dependent upon stakeholder research preferences has not been adequately addressed in the literature. Two widely used quantitative customer satisfaction evaluation approaches, involving stated and derived importance, are compared within a real life market research setting at an international bank. The comparative analysis informs an ongoing debate surrounding the applicability of explicit and implicit importance measures and demonstrates how recommendations are dependent upon the methodological and analytical techniques selected. The findings, therefore, have significant implications for importance based satisfaction market research planning and highlight the need to consider the impact of stakeholder preferences on research outcomes.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84955245790&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2501/IJMR-2016-005

DO - 10.2501/IJMR-2016-005

M3 - Article

VL - 58

SP - 35

EP - 55

JO - International Journal of Market Research

JF - International Journal of Market Research

SN - 1470-7853

IS - 1

ER -