Strategy paradigms for the management of quality: dealing with complexity

Ian Combe, Günther Botschen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Quality management is dominated by rational paradigms for the measurement and management of quality, but these paradigms start to “break down”, when faced with the inherent complexity of managing quality in intensely competitive changing environments. In this article, the various theoretical strategy paradigms employed to manage quality are reviewed and the advantages and limitations of these paradigms are highlighted. A major implication of this review is that when faced with complexity, an ideological stance to any single strategy paradigm for the management of quality is ineffective. A case study is used to demonstrate the need for an integrative multi-paradigm approach to the management of quality as complexity increases.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)500-523
Number of pages24
JournalEuropean Journal of Marketing
Volume38
Issue number5-6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2004

Fingerprint

Paradigm
Competitive environment
Quality management
Breakdown

Bibliographical note

© Emerald Group Publishing Limited 2004
Published by Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Keywords

  • quality management
  • quality management techniques
  • complexity theory
  • ideologies

Cite this

@article{c4983bf24b084e429a0318337542b1ff,
title = "Strategy paradigms for the management of quality: dealing with complexity",
abstract = "Quality management is dominated by rational paradigms for the measurement and management of quality, but these paradigms start to “break down”, when faced with the inherent complexity of managing quality in intensely competitive changing environments. In this article, the various theoretical strategy paradigms employed to manage quality are reviewed and the advantages and limitations of these paradigms are highlighted. A major implication of this review is that when faced with complexity, an ideological stance to any single strategy paradigm for the management of quality is ineffective. A case study is used to demonstrate the need for an integrative multi-paradigm approach to the management of quality as complexity increases.",
keywords = "quality management, quality management techniques, complexity theory, ideologies",
author = "Ian Combe and G{\"u}nther Botschen",
note = "{\circledC} Emerald Group Publishing Limited 2004 Published by Emerald Group Publishing Limited",
year = "2004",
doi = "10.1108/03090560410529187",
language = "English",
volume = "38",
pages = "500--523",
journal = "European Journal of Marketing",
issn = "0309-0566",
publisher = "Emerald Group Publishing Ltd.",
number = "5-6",

}

Strategy paradigms for the management of quality : dealing with complexity. / Combe, Ian; Botschen, Günther.

In: European Journal of Marketing, Vol. 38, No. 5-6, 2004, p. 500-523.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Strategy paradigms for the management of quality

T2 - dealing with complexity

AU - Combe, Ian

AU - Botschen, Günther

N1 - © Emerald Group Publishing Limited 2004 Published by Emerald Group Publishing Limited

PY - 2004

Y1 - 2004

N2 - Quality management is dominated by rational paradigms for the measurement and management of quality, but these paradigms start to “break down”, when faced with the inherent complexity of managing quality in intensely competitive changing environments. In this article, the various theoretical strategy paradigms employed to manage quality are reviewed and the advantages and limitations of these paradigms are highlighted. A major implication of this review is that when faced with complexity, an ideological stance to any single strategy paradigm for the management of quality is ineffective. A case study is used to demonstrate the need for an integrative multi-paradigm approach to the management of quality as complexity increases.

AB - Quality management is dominated by rational paradigms for the measurement and management of quality, but these paradigms start to “break down”, when faced with the inherent complexity of managing quality in intensely competitive changing environments. In this article, the various theoretical strategy paradigms employed to manage quality are reviewed and the advantages and limitations of these paradigms are highlighted. A major implication of this review is that when faced with complexity, an ideological stance to any single strategy paradigm for the management of quality is ineffective. A case study is used to demonstrate the need for an integrative multi-paradigm approach to the management of quality as complexity increases.

KW - quality management

KW - quality management techniques

KW - complexity theory

KW - ideologies

UR - http://www.emeraldinsight.com/journals.htm?issn=0309-0566&volume=38&issue=5&articleid=853931&show=abstract

U2 - 10.1108/03090560410529187

DO - 10.1108/03090560410529187

M3 - Article

VL - 38

SP - 500

EP - 523

JO - European Journal of Marketing

JF - European Journal of Marketing

SN - 0309-0566

IS - 5-6

ER -