Sub-types of nonbelieved memories reveal differential outcomes of challenges to memories

Alan Scoboria, Robert A. Nash, Giuliana Mazzoni

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Nonbelieved memories (NBMs) highlight the independence between metamemorial judgments that contribute to the experience of remembering. Initial definitions of NBMs portrayed them as involving the withdrawal of autobiographical belief despite sustained recollection. While people rate belief for their NBMs as weaker than recollection, the average difference is too small to support the idea that belief is completely withdrawn in all cases. Furthermore, ratings vary considerably across NBMs. In two studies, we reanalyzed reports from prior studies to examine whether NBM reports reflect a single category or multiple sub-categories using cluster analytic methods. In Study 1, we identified three sub-types of NBMs. In Study 2 we incorporated the concept of belief in accuracy, and found that two of the clusters from Study 1 split into two clusters apiece. Higher ratings of recollection than belief in occurrence characterized all clusters, which were differentiated by the degree of difference between these variables. In both studies the clusters were differentiated by a number of memory characteristic ratings and by reasons reported as leading to the alteration of belief. Implications for understanding the remembering of past events and predicting the creation of NBMs are discussed.
LanguageEnglish
Pages876-889
Number of pages14
JournalMemory
Volume25
Early online date11 Jul 2016
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 May 2017

Fingerprint

Rating
Recollection
Remembering
Alteration
Analytic Method
Split

Bibliographical note

This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Memory on 11/07/2016, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/09658211.2016.1203437.

Keywords

  • nonbelieved memory
  • subtype
  • cluster analysis
  • belief in occurence
  • accuracy
  • memory

Cite this

@article{831b2f7feddf4c65911ea4c44fcd9392,
title = "Sub-types of nonbelieved memories reveal differential outcomes of challenges to memories",
abstract = "Nonbelieved memories (NBMs) highlight the independence between metamemorial judgments that contribute to the experience of remembering. Initial definitions of NBMs portrayed them as involving the withdrawal of autobiographical belief despite sustained recollection. While people rate belief for their NBMs as weaker than recollection, the average difference is too small to support the idea that belief is completely withdrawn in all cases. Furthermore, ratings vary considerably across NBMs. In two studies, we reanalyzed reports from prior studies to examine whether NBM reports reflect a single category or multiple sub-categories using cluster analytic methods. In Study 1, we identified three sub-types of NBMs. In Study 2 we incorporated the concept of belief in accuracy, and found that two of the clusters from Study 1 split into two clusters apiece. Higher ratings of recollection than belief in occurrence characterized all clusters, which were differentiated by the degree of difference between these variables. In both studies the clusters were differentiated by a number of memory characteristic ratings and by reasons reported as leading to the alteration of belief. Implications for understanding the remembering of past events and predicting the creation of NBMs are discussed.",
keywords = "nonbelieved memory, subtype, cluster analysis, belief in occurence, accuracy, memory",
author = "Alan Scoboria and Nash, {Robert A.} and Giuliana Mazzoni",
note = "This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Memory on 11/07/2016, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/09658211.2016.1203437.",
year = "2017",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/09658211.2016.1203437",
language = "English",
volume = "25",
pages = "876--889",
journal = "Memory",
issn = "0965-8211",
publisher = "Psychology Press",

}

Sub-types of nonbelieved memories reveal differential outcomes of challenges to memories. / Scoboria, Alan; Nash, Robert A.; Mazzoni, Giuliana.

In: Memory, Vol. 25, 01.05.2017, p. 876-889.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Sub-types of nonbelieved memories reveal differential outcomes of challenges to memories

AU - Scoboria, Alan

AU - Nash, Robert A.

AU - Mazzoni, Giuliana

N1 - This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Memory on 11/07/2016, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/09658211.2016.1203437.

PY - 2017/5/1

Y1 - 2017/5/1

N2 - Nonbelieved memories (NBMs) highlight the independence between metamemorial judgments that contribute to the experience of remembering. Initial definitions of NBMs portrayed them as involving the withdrawal of autobiographical belief despite sustained recollection. While people rate belief for their NBMs as weaker than recollection, the average difference is too small to support the idea that belief is completely withdrawn in all cases. Furthermore, ratings vary considerably across NBMs. In two studies, we reanalyzed reports from prior studies to examine whether NBM reports reflect a single category or multiple sub-categories using cluster analytic methods. In Study 1, we identified three sub-types of NBMs. In Study 2 we incorporated the concept of belief in accuracy, and found that two of the clusters from Study 1 split into two clusters apiece. Higher ratings of recollection than belief in occurrence characterized all clusters, which were differentiated by the degree of difference between these variables. In both studies the clusters were differentiated by a number of memory characteristic ratings and by reasons reported as leading to the alteration of belief. Implications for understanding the remembering of past events and predicting the creation of NBMs are discussed.

AB - Nonbelieved memories (NBMs) highlight the independence between metamemorial judgments that contribute to the experience of remembering. Initial definitions of NBMs portrayed them as involving the withdrawal of autobiographical belief despite sustained recollection. While people rate belief for their NBMs as weaker than recollection, the average difference is too small to support the idea that belief is completely withdrawn in all cases. Furthermore, ratings vary considerably across NBMs. In two studies, we reanalyzed reports from prior studies to examine whether NBM reports reflect a single category or multiple sub-categories using cluster analytic methods. In Study 1, we identified three sub-types of NBMs. In Study 2 we incorporated the concept of belief in accuracy, and found that two of the clusters from Study 1 split into two clusters apiece. Higher ratings of recollection than belief in occurrence characterized all clusters, which were differentiated by the degree of difference between these variables. In both studies the clusters were differentiated by a number of memory characteristic ratings and by reasons reported as leading to the alteration of belief. Implications for understanding the remembering of past events and predicting the creation of NBMs are discussed.

KW - nonbelieved memory

KW - subtype

KW - cluster analysis

KW - belief in occurence

KW - accuracy

KW - memory

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84978127357&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/09658211.2016.1203437

DO - 10.1080/09658211.2016.1203437

M3 - Article

VL - 25

SP - 876

EP - 889

JO - Memory

T2 - Memory

JF - Memory

SN - 0965-8211

ER -