Subtractive and divisive adaptation in visual motion computations

Keith Langley*, Stephen J. Anderson

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Models of visual motion processing that introduce priors for low speed through Bayesian computations are sometimes treated with scepticism by empirical researchers because of the convenient way in which parameters of the Bayesian priors have been chosen. Using the effects of motion adaptation on motion perception to illustrate, we show that the Bayesian prior, far from being convenient, may be estimated on-line and therefore represents a useful tool by which visual motion processes may be optimized in order to extract the motion signals commonly encountered in every day experience. The prescription for optimization, when combined with system constraints on the transmission of visual information, may lead to an exaggeration of perceptual bias through the process of adaptation. Our approach extends the Bayesian model of visual motion proposed byWeiss et al. [Weiss Y., Simoncelli, E., & Adelson, E. (2002). Motion illusions as optimal perception Nature Neuroscience, 5:598-604.], in suggesting that perceptual bias reflects a compromise taken by a rational system in the face of uncertain signals and system constraints. © 2007.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)673-686
Number of pages14
JournalVision Research
Volume47
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2007

Fingerprint

Motion Perception
Bayes Theorem
Neurosciences
Prescriptions
Research Personnel

Keywords

  • auto-correlation function
  • Bayes prior
  • Garotte function
  • Kalman filter
  • Leaky predictive coding

Cite this

@article{90a3401dbda4436ba85ff47055258eec,
title = "Subtractive and divisive adaptation in visual motion computations",
abstract = "Models of visual motion processing that introduce priors for low speed through Bayesian computations are sometimes treated with scepticism by empirical researchers because of the convenient way in which parameters of the Bayesian priors have been chosen. Using the effects of motion adaptation on motion perception to illustrate, we show that the Bayesian prior, far from being convenient, may be estimated on-line and therefore represents a useful tool by which visual motion processes may be optimized in order to extract the motion signals commonly encountered in every day experience. The prescription for optimization, when combined with system constraints on the transmission of visual information, may lead to an exaggeration of perceptual bias through the process of adaptation. Our approach extends the Bayesian model of visual motion proposed byWeiss et al. [Weiss Y., Simoncelli, E., & Adelson, E. (2002). Motion illusions as optimal perception Nature Neuroscience, 5:598-604.], in suggesting that perceptual bias reflects a compromise taken by a rational system in the face of uncertain signals and system constraints. {\circledC} 2007.",
keywords = "auto-correlation function, Bayes prior, Garotte function, Kalman filter, Leaky predictive coding",
author = "Keith Langley and Anderson, {Stephen J.}",
year = "2007",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1016/j.visres.2006.09.031",
language = "English",
volume = "47",
pages = "673--686",
journal = "Vision Research",
issn = "0042-6989",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "5",

}

Subtractive and divisive adaptation in visual motion computations. / Langley, Keith; Anderson, Stephen J.

In: Vision Research, Vol. 47, No. 5, 03.2007, p. 673-686.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Subtractive and divisive adaptation in visual motion computations

AU - Langley, Keith

AU - Anderson, Stephen J.

PY - 2007/3

Y1 - 2007/3

N2 - Models of visual motion processing that introduce priors for low speed through Bayesian computations are sometimes treated with scepticism by empirical researchers because of the convenient way in which parameters of the Bayesian priors have been chosen. Using the effects of motion adaptation on motion perception to illustrate, we show that the Bayesian prior, far from being convenient, may be estimated on-line and therefore represents a useful tool by which visual motion processes may be optimized in order to extract the motion signals commonly encountered in every day experience. The prescription for optimization, when combined with system constraints on the transmission of visual information, may lead to an exaggeration of perceptual bias through the process of adaptation. Our approach extends the Bayesian model of visual motion proposed byWeiss et al. [Weiss Y., Simoncelli, E., & Adelson, E. (2002). Motion illusions as optimal perception Nature Neuroscience, 5:598-604.], in suggesting that perceptual bias reflects a compromise taken by a rational system in the face of uncertain signals and system constraints. © 2007.

AB - Models of visual motion processing that introduce priors for low speed through Bayesian computations are sometimes treated with scepticism by empirical researchers because of the convenient way in which parameters of the Bayesian priors have been chosen. Using the effects of motion adaptation on motion perception to illustrate, we show that the Bayesian prior, far from being convenient, may be estimated on-line and therefore represents a useful tool by which visual motion processes may be optimized in order to extract the motion signals commonly encountered in every day experience. The prescription for optimization, when combined with system constraints on the transmission of visual information, may lead to an exaggeration of perceptual bias through the process of adaptation. Our approach extends the Bayesian model of visual motion proposed byWeiss et al. [Weiss Y., Simoncelli, E., & Adelson, E. (2002). Motion illusions as optimal perception Nature Neuroscience, 5:598-604.], in suggesting that perceptual bias reflects a compromise taken by a rational system in the face of uncertain signals and system constraints. © 2007.

KW - auto-correlation function

KW - Bayes prior

KW - Garotte function

KW - Kalman filter

KW - Leaky predictive coding

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33846938571&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.visres.2006.09.031

DO - 10.1016/j.visres.2006.09.031

M3 - Article

C2 - 17257641

VL - 47

SP - 673

EP - 686

JO - Vision Research

JF - Vision Research

SN - 0042-6989

IS - 5

ER -