Temporary institutional breakdowns: the work of university traditions in the consumption of innovative textbooks

Mark Palmer, Ronan de Kervenoael, Dimitry Jacob

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Although university traditions can be fun, they are ‘not just for fun’. Moving beyond the visual quaint imagery of university traditions, this study explores the workings of institutional traditions during the everyday consumption of pedagogic innovation. The study employs a Reader-Response Theory, a prominent school of literary criticism, of two textbook innovations within a university establishment which had a distinct tradition to research beginning in the early 1960s. The findings suggest that the temporary institutional breakdown provides a powerful medium to understand the work of university traditions in the consumption of innovative textbooks. We show that in the consumption of pedagogic innovation, the recipients are not passive but are co-constructors of university tradition defence, via the articulation of values, boundary containment and identity work. We identify, moreover, four types of readings of the pedagogic innovation – interpretative, instrumental, inversive and reflexive. The findings also reveal three distinct forms of tradition vocabularies employed in the university administration of pedagogic innovation – breach concerns, redress articulation and reintegration epistemology. Overall, the findings contribute to a more sophisticated understanding of the ‘past in the present’ in the workings of university traditions in the everyday consumption of pedagogic innovation.
Original languageEnglish
JournalStudies in Higher Education
Volumein press
Early online date19 May 2017
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 19 May 2017

Fingerprint

textbook
pedagogics
university
innovation
university administration
literary criticism
reintegration
epistemology
vocabulary
recipient
present
school
Values

Bibliographical note

This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Studies in Higher Education on 19 May 2017, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/03075079.2017.1324840

Keywords

  • tradition
  • pedagogic innovation
  • institutions
  • reader response
  • consumption

Cite this

@article{9f0dcee3a26d451c91e8669db989e1e3,
title = "Temporary institutional breakdowns: the work of university traditions in the consumption of innovative textbooks",
abstract = "Although university traditions can be fun, they are ‘not just for fun’. Moving beyond the visual quaint imagery of university traditions, this study explores the workings of institutional traditions during the everyday consumption of pedagogic innovation. The study employs a Reader-Response Theory, a prominent school of literary criticism, of two textbook innovations within a university establishment which had a distinct tradition to research beginning in the early 1960s. The findings suggest that the temporary institutional breakdown provides a powerful medium to understand the work of university traditions in the consumption of innovative textbooks. We show that in the consumption of pedagogic innovation, the recipients are not passive but are co-constructors of university tradition defence, via the articulation of values, boundary containment and identity work. We identify, moreover, four types of readings of the pedagogic innovation – interpretative, instrumental, inversive and reflexive. The findings also reveal three distinct forms of tradition vocabularies employed in the university administration of pedagogic innovation – breach concerns, redress articulation and reintegration epistemology. Overall, the findings contribute to a more sophisticated understanding of the ‘past in the present’ in the workings of university traditions in the everyday consumption of pedagogic innovation.",
keywords = "tradition, pedagogic innovation, institutions, reader response, consumption",
author = "Mark Palmer and {de Kervenoael}, Ronan and Dimitry Jacob",
note = "This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Studies in Higher Education on 19 May 2017, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/03075079.2017.1324840",
year = "2017",
month = "5",
day = "19",
doi = "10.1080/03075079.2017.1324840",
language = "English",
volume = "in press",
journal = "Studies in Higher Education",
issn = "0307-5079",
publisher = "Routledge",

}

Temporary institutional breakdowns : the work of university traditions in the consumption of innovative textbooks. / Palmer, Mark; de Kervenoael, Ronan; Jacob, Dimitry.

In: Studies in Higher Education, Vol. in press, 19.05.2017.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Temporary institutional breakdowns

T2 - the work of university traditions in the consumption of innovative textbooks

AU - Palmer, Mark

AU - de Kervenoael, Ronan

AU - Jacob, Dimitry

N1 - This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Studies in Higher Education on 19 May 2017, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/03075079.2017.1324840

PY - 2017/5/19

Y1 - 2017/5/19

N2 - Although university traditions can be fun, they are ‘not just for fun’. Moving beyond the visual quaint imagery of university traditions, this study explores the workings of institutional traditions during the everyday consumption of pedagogic innovation. The study employs a Reader-Response Theory, a prominent school of literary criticism, of two textbook innovations within a university establishment which had a distinct tradition to research beginning in the early 1960s. The findings suggest that the temporary institutional breakdown provides a powerful medium to understand the work of university traditions in the consumption of innovative textbooks. We show that in the consumption of pedagogic innovation, the recipients are not passive but are co-constructors of university tradition defence, via the articulation of values, boundary containment and identity work. We identify, moreover, four types of readings of the pedagogic innovation – interpretative, instrumental, inversive and reflexive. The findings also reveal three distinct forms of tradition vocabularies employed in the university administration of pedagogic innovation – breach concerns, redress articulation and reintegration epistemology. Overall, the findings contribute to a more sophisticated understanding of the ‘past in the present’ in the workings of university traditions in the everyday consumption of pedagogic innovation.

AB - Although university traditions can be fun, they are ‘not just for fun’. Moving beyond the visual quaint imagery of university traditions, this study explores the workings of institutional traditions during the everyday consumption of pedagogic innovation. The study employs a Reader-Response Theory, a prominent school of literary criticism, of two textbook innovations within a university establishment which had a distinct tradition to research beginning in the early 1960s. The findings suggest that the temporary institutional breakdown provides a powerful medium to understand the work of university traditions in the consumption of innovative textbooks. We show that in the consumption of pedagogic innovation, the recipients are not passive but are co-constructors of university tradition defence, via the articulation of values, boundary containment and identity work. We identify, moreover, four types of readings of the pedagogic innovation – interpretative, instrumental, inversive and reflexive. The findings also reveal three distinct forms of tradition vocabularies employed in the university administration of pedagogic innovation – breach concerns, redress articulation and reintegration epistemology. Overall, the findings contribute to a more sophisticated understanding of the ‘past in the present’ in the workings of university traditions in the everyday consumption of pedagogic innovation.

KW - tradition

KW - pedagogic innovation

KW - institutions

KW - reader response

KW - consumption

UR - http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/03075079.2017.1324840

U2 - 10.1080/03075079.2017.1324840

DO - 10.1080/03075079.2017.1324840

M3 - Article

VL - in press

JO - Studies in Higher Education

JF - Studies in Higher Education

SN - 0307-5079

ER -