Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to explore a number of tensions arising in the presentation of autoethnographical research. The paper provides a reflexive autoethnographical account of undertaking and publically presenting autoethnographical research. The paper problematises the extent and form of disclosure; the voice and representation of the researcher; the difficulties in dealing with sensitive subjects; conflicts between public and private domains; questions of validity; the extent and form of theorisation of autoethnographical narratives; and emotion and performativity in presenting autoethnographical research. The paper provides an analysis of the potential of autoethnography, while exploring the presentational and performative context of academia.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 134-149 |
| Number of pages | 16 |
| Journal | Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management: An International Journal |
| Volume | 6 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2011 |
Keywords
- academia
- autoethnography
- performativity
- reflexivity
- representation
- research
- research methods
- self
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Tensions in (re)presenting the self in reflexive autoethnographical research'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver