Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

The battle over the EU'S proposed humanitarian trade preferences for Pakistan: A case study in multifaceted protectionism

  • Sangeeta Khorana*
  • , May T. Yeung
  • , William A. Kerr
  • , Nick Perdikis
  • *Corresponding author for this work
  • Estey Centre for Law and Economics in International Trade
  • University of Saskatchewan
  • Aberystwyth University

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

In the wake of devastating floods in Pakistan in 2010, the European Union (EU) has attempted to use trade policy to provide humanitarian assistance by the temporary lowering of tariffs on select imports from Pakistan. This Proposal, justified on humanitarian grounds, requires a World Trade Organization (WTO) waiver, which so far has not been possible, amidst developing countries' concerns regarding erosion of the value of their preferential access to the EU market. A detailed examination of the EU Proposal indicates marginal benefit to Pakistan at best, given that sensitive import-competing products were largely excluded, suggesting that protectionist interests had a hand in shaping the policy. The findings also suggest that trade policy might not be an effective means to provide humanitarian assistance.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)33-59
Number of pages27
JournalJournal of World Trade
Volume46
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2012

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 10 - Reduced Inequalities
    SDG 10 Reduced Inequalities

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The battle over the EU'S proposed humanitarian trade preferences for Pakistan: A case study in multifaceted protectionism'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this