Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

The contact lens-tear film interface: Investigating the tear envelope

  • Visioncare Research Limited

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1   Link opens in a new tab Citation (SciVal)
20 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

PURPOSE: To explore the complex interface between the tear film, a unique mucosal fluid which is fundamental to ocular homeostasis and optimal vision, and an in-situ contact lens. This study exploits the use of a unique tear envelope (TE) extraction technique, which harvests the material-influenced layer of tear film that is in intimate contact with the lens during wear, to specifically investigate the influence of contact lens wear on tear film protein dynamics.

METHODS: TEs were collected from freshly removed worn lens using a novel microcentrifuge 'piggyback' technique. Two distinct ex vivo studies were performed to investigate the key influencing factors involved. Non lens-wearing tear samples were also collected from all wearers. A compositional protein profile for each TE and tear film (TF) sample was obtained using an Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer lab-on-a-chip microfluidic assay which detected proteins in a 14-230 kDa range.

RESULTS: The data demonstrated that the TE protein compositional profile was quite distinct from either that of tear components deposited on the lens or those held in the tear menisci. For example, for one of the participant subgroups the tear protein average values in tears (n = 39) were determined at 35.2 ± 2.5 % lysozyme, 17.2 ± 0.6 % lipocalin, 7.3 ± 1.6 % IgA, 20.3 ± 1.3 % lactoferrin and 0.4 ± 0.4 % albumin as a function of total protein detected. In contrast, the average TE values were measured at 49.2 ± 3.7 %, 21.3 ± 3.9 %, 7.8 ± 1.6 % and 10.2 ± 1.7 % and 1.3 ± 2.8 % respectively with omafilcon A wear. In addition, 63 % of all TE samples (n = 180) (wearing lotrafilcon B and omafilcon A lenses) were albumin positive compared with only 19 % of all pre-lens insertion tear film samples (n = 237).

CONCLUSIONS: The TE approach not only allows material differentiation, but it can determine changes in the ocular host response that may otherwise be missed by sole non lens-wearing tear film sample analysis.

Original languageEnglish
Article number102319
Number of pages10
JournalContact Lens & Anterior Eye : The Journal of the British Contact Lens Association
Volume48
Issue number2
Early online date16 Oct 2024
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2025

Bibliographical note

Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of British Contact Lens Association. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

Funding

The authors would like to thank Johnson & Johnson Vision Care for providing them with the means and financial security to perform some of these studies. They would also like to thank the Ophthalmic Research Group at Aston University for setting up and managing the clinical studies and participant recruitment.

Keywords

  • Albumin
  • Contact lens/tear protein interaction
  • Interfacial tear envelope
  • Material influence

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The contact lens-tear film interface: Investigating the tear envelope'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this