The curious promise of educationalising technological unemployment: What can places of learning really do about the future of work?

Michael Peters, Petar Jandrić, Sarah L Hayes

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

University education is full of promise. Indeed universities have the capacity to create and shape, through staff and students, all kinds of enthralling ‘worlds’ and ‘new possibilities of life’. Yet students are encouraged increasingly to view universities as simply a means to an end, where neoliberal education delivers flexible skills to directly serve a certain type of capitalism. Additionally, the universal challenge of technological unemployment, alongside numerous other social issues, has become educationalised and portrayed in HE policy, as an issue to be solved by universities. The idea that more education can resolve the problem of technological unemployment is a political construction which has largely failed to deliver its promise. In this article, we look at educationalisation in hand with technologisation and we draw on a Critical Discourse Analysis of HE policies, to demonstrate the problems arising from taken for granted visions of neoliberal social development related to education, technology, and employment. To disrupt the tired visions of ‘techno-fixes’ and ‘edu-fixes’ we identify in these texts, we call for a radical re-imagining of HE policy. Instead of attributing responsibility for social change to abstract notions of education, market and technology, a new shared vision is needed where more agency is explicitly attributed to the researchers, teachers, and students who are the genuine human future of work.
Original languageEnglish
JournalEducational Philosophy and Theory
Early online date20 Feb 2018
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 20 Feb 2018

Fingerprint

unemployment
learning
university
education
student
university education
social issue
discourse analysis
social development
capitalist society
social change
staff
responsibility
Education
Unemployment
market
teacher

Bibliographical note

© 2018 Informa UK Limited, publishing as Taylor & Francis. This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Educational Philosophy and Theory on 20/2/18, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/00131857.2018.1439376.

Keywords

  • Technological unemploymen
  • educationalisation
  • technologisation
  • critical discourse analysis
  • student
  • engagement
  • employability

Cite this

@article{0152b1ebcdf74a679932e3a8196810b6,
title = "The curious promise of educationalising technological unemployment: What can places of learning really do about the future of work?",
abstract = "University education is full of promise. Indeed universities have the capacity to create and shape, through staff and students, all kinds of enthralling ‘worlds’ and ‘new possibilities of life’. Yet students are encouraged increasingly to view universities as simply a means to an end, where neoliberal education delivers flexible skills to directly serve a certain type of capitalism. Additionally, the universal challenge of technological unemployment, alongside numerous other social issues, has become educationalised and portrayed in HE policy, as an issue to be solved by universities. The idea that more education can resolve the problem of technological unemployment is a political construction which has largely failed to deliver its promise. In this article, we look at educationalisation in hand with technologisation and we draw on a Critical Discourse Analysis of HE policies, to demonstrate the problems arising from taken for granted visions of neoliberal social development related to education, technology, and employment. To disrupt the tired visions of ‘techno-fixes’ and ‘edu-fixes’ we identify in these texts, we call for a radical re-imagining of HE policy. Instead of attributing responsibility for social change to abstract notions of education, market and technology, a new shared vision is needed where more agency is explicitly attributed to the researchers, teachers, and students who are the genuine human future of work.",
keywords = "Technological unemploymen, educationalisation, technologisation, critical discourse analysis, student, engagement, employability",
author = "Michael Peters and Petar Jandrić and Hayes, {Sarah L}",
note = "{\circledC} 2018 Informa UK Limited, publishing as Taylor & Francis. This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Educational Philosophy and Theory on 20/2/18, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/00131857.2018.1439376.",
year = "2018",
month = "2",
day = "20",
doi = "10.1080/00131857.2018.1439376",
language = "English",

}

The curious promise of educationalising technological unemployment: What can places of learning really do about the future of work? / Peters, Michael ; Jandrić, Petar; Hayes, Sarah L.

In: Educational Philosophy and Theory, 20.02.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The curious promise of educationalising technological unemployment: What can places of learning really do about the future of work?

AU - Peters, Michael

AU - Jandrić, Petar

AU - Hayes, Sarah L

N1 - © 2018 Informa UK Limited, publishing as Taylor & Francis. This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Educational Philosophy and Theory on 20/2/18, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/00131857.2018.1439376.

PY - 2018/2/20

Y1 - 2018/2/20

N2 - University education is full of promise. Indeed universities have the capacity to create and shape, through staff and students, all kinds of enthralling ‘worlds’ and ‘new possibilities of life’. Yet students are encouraged increasingly to view universities as simply a means to an end, where neoliberal education delivers flexible skills to directly serve a certain type of capitalism. Additionally, the universal challenge of technological unemployment, alongside numerous other social issues, has become educationalised and portrayed in HE policy, as an issue to be solved by universities. The idea that more education can resolve the problem of technological unemployment is a political construction which has largely failed to deliver its promise. In this article, we look at educationalisation in hand with technologisation and we draw on a Critical Discourse Analysis of HE policies, to demonstrate the problems arising from taken for granted visions of neoliberal social development related to education, technology, and employment. To disrupt the tired visions of ‘techno-fixes’ and ‘edu-fixes’ we identify in these texts, we call for a radical re-imagining of HE policy. Instead of attributing responsibility for social change to abstract notions of education, market and technology, a new shared vision is needed where more agency is explicitly attributed to the researchers, teachers, and students who are the genuine human future of work.

AB - University education is full of promise. Indeed universities have the capacity to create and shape, through staff and students, all kinds of enthralling ‘worlds’ and ‘new possibilities of life’. Yet students are encouraged increasingly to view universities as simply a means to an end, where neoliberal education delivers flexible skills to directly serve a certain type of capitalism. Additionally, the universal challenge of technological unemployment, alongside numerous other social issues, has become educationalised and portrayed in HE policy, as an issue to be solved by universities. The idea that more education can resolve the problem of technological unemployment is a political construction which has largely failed to deliver its promise. In this article, we look at educationalisation in hand with technologisation and we draw on a Critical Discourse Analysis of HE policies, to demonstrate the problems arising from taken for granted visions of neoliberal social development related to education, technology, and employment. To disrupt the tired visions of ‘techno-fixes’ and ‘edu-fixes’ we identify in these texts, we call for a radical re-imagining of HE policy. Instead of attributing responsibility for social change to abstract notions of education, market and technology, a new shared vision is needed where more agency is explicitly attributed to the researchers, teachers, and students who are the genuine human future of work.

KW - Technological unemploymen

KW - educationalisation

KW - technologisation

KW - critical discourse analysis

KW - student

KW - engagement

KW - employability

UR - http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/00131857.2018.1439376

UR - https://www.scopus.com/record/display.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85042220514&origin=SingleRecordEmailAlert&dgcid=raven_sc_search_en_us_email&txGid=8c3717874c96b1b7cd4c5e92e4d06ea0

U2 - 10.1080/00131857.2018.1439376

DO - 10.1080/00131857.2018.1439376

M3 - Article

ER -