The dynamics of power and resistance in police interview discourse

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This is a study of police interviewing using an integrated approach, drawing on CA, CDA and pragmatics. The study focuses on the balance of power and control, finding that in particular the institutional status of the participants, the discursive roles assigned to them by the context, and their relative knowledge, are significant factors affecting the dynamics of the discourse. Four discursive features are identified as particularly significant, and a detailed analysis of the complex interplay of these features shows that power and control are constantly under negotiation, and are always open to challenge and resistance. Further it is shown that discursive dominance is not necessarily advantageous to participants, due to the specific goals and purposes of the police interview context. A wider consideration of the context illustrates the contribution that linguistics can make to the use of police interview data as evidence in the UK criminal justice system.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)739-759
Number of pages20
JournalDiscourse and Society
Volume17
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2006

Fingerprint

Law enforcement
police
discourse
interview
balance of power
Linguistics
pragmatics
justice
linguistics
evidence
Discourse
Discursive
Police Interview

Keywords

  • forensic linguistics
  • police interviews
  • power
  • institutional discourse

Cite this

@article{71156e26fbb74c6d987ab2b10b0f918a,
title = "The dynamics of power and resistance in police interview discourse",
abstract = "This is a study of police interviewing using an integrated approach, drawing on CA, CDA and pragmatics. The study focuses on the balance of power and control, finding that in particular the institutional status of the participants, the discursive roles assigned to them by the context, and their relative knowledge, are significant factors affecting the dynamics of the discourse. Four discursive features are identified as particularly significant, and a detailed analysis of the complex interplay of these features shows that power and control are constantly under negotiation, and are always open to challenge and resistance. Further it is shown that discursive dominance is not necessarily advantageous to participants, due to the specific goals and purposes of the police interview context. A wider consideration of the context illustrates the contribution that linguistics can make to the use of police interview data as evidence in the UK criminal justice system.",
keywords = "forensic linguistics, police interviews, power, institutional discourse",
author = "Kate Haworth",
year = "2006",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1177/0957926506068430",
language = "English",
volume = "17",
pages = "739--759",
journal = "Discourse and Society",
issn = "0957-9265",
publisher = "SAGE",
number = "6",

}

The dynamics of power and resistance in police interview discourse. / Haworth, Kate.

In: Discourse and Society, Vol. 17, No. 6, 11.2006, p. 739-759.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The dynamics of power and resistance in police interview discourse

AU - Haworth, Kate

PY - 2006/11

Y1 - 2006/11

N2 - This is a study of police interviewing using an integrated approach, drawing on CA, CDA and pragmatics. The study focuses on the balance of power and control, finding that in particular the institutional status of the participants, the discursive roles assigned to them by the context, and their relative knowledge, are significant factors affecting the dynamics of the discourse. Four discursive features are identified as particularly significant, and a detailed analysis of the complex interplay of these features shows that power and control are constantly under negotiation, and are always open to challenge and resistance. Further it is shown that discursive dominance is not necessarily advantageous to participants, due to the specific goals and purposes of the police interview context. A wider consideration of the context illustrates the contribution that linguistics can make to the use of police interview data as evidence in the UK criminal justice system.

AB - This is a study of police interviewing using an integrated approach, drawing on CA, CDA and pragmatics. The study focuses on the balance of power and control, finding that in particular the institutional status of the participants, the discursive roles assigned to them by the context, and their relative knowledge, are significant factors affecting the dynamics of the discourse. Four discursive features are identified as particularly significant, and a detailed analysis of the complex interplay of these features shows that power and control are constantly under negotiation, and are always open to challenge and resistance. Further it is shown that discursive dominance is not necessarily advantageous to participants, due to the specific goals and purposes of the police interview context. A wider consideration of the context illustrates the contribution that linguistics can make to the use of police interview data as evidence in the UK criminal justice system.

KW - forensic linguistics

KW - police interviews

KW - power

KW - institutional discourse

UR - http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0957926506068430

U2 - 10.1177/0957926506068430

DO - 10.1177/0957926506068430

M3 - Article

VL - 17

SP - 739

EP - 759

JO - Discourse and Society

JF - Discourse and Society

SN - 0957-9265

IS - 6

ER -