The impact of leadership and quality climate on hospital performance

Helen Shipton, Claire Armstrong, Michael West, Jeremy Dawson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objective. To explore the relationship between leadership effectiveness and health-care trust performance, taking into account external quality measures and the number of patient complaints; also, to examine the role of care quality climate as a mediator. Design. We developed scales for rating leadership effectiveness and care quality climate. We then drew upon UK national indices of health-care trust performance—Commission for Health Improvement star ratings, Clinical Governance Review ratings and the number of patient complaints per thousand. We conducted statistical analysis to examine any significant relationships between predictor and outcome variables. Setting. The study is based on 86 hospital trusts run by the National Health Service (NHS) in the UK. The data collection is part of an annual staff survey commissioned by the NHS to explore the quality of working life. Participants. A total of 17 949 employees were randomly surveyed (41% of the total sample). Results. Leadership effectiveness is associated with higher Clinical Governance Review ratings and Commission for Health Improvement star ratings for our sample (ß = 0.42, P < 0.05; ß = 0.37, P < 0.05, respectively), and lower patient complaints (ß = –0.57, P < 0.05). In addition, 98% of the relationship between leadership and patient complaints is explained by care quality climate. Conclusions. Results offer insight into how non-clinical leadership may foster performance outcomes for health-care organizations. A frequently neglected area—patient complaints—may be a valid measure to consider when assessing leadership and quality in a health-care context.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)439-445
Number of pages7
JournalInternational Journal for Quality in Health Care
Volume20
Issue number6
Early online date10 Sep 2008
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2008

Fingerprint

Climate
Quality of Health Care
Clinical Governance
Delivery of Health Care
National Health Programs
Health
Quality of Life
Organizations

Keywords

  • leadership
  • quality climate
  • hospital trust
  • patient complaints
  • performance

Cite this

Shipton, Helen ; Armstrong, Claire ; West, Michael ; Dawson, Jeremy. / The impact of leadership and quality climate on hospital performance. In: International Journal for Quality in Health Care. 2008 ; Vol. 20, No. 6. pp. 439-445.
@article{ffafe1f4ff504e13a6f08b3d2d8cea6b,
title = "The impact of leadership and quality climate on hospital performance",
abstract = "Objective. To explore the relationship between leadership effectiveness and health-care trust performance, taking into account external quality measures and the number of patient complaints; also, to examine the role of care quality climate as a mediator. Design. We developed scales for rating leadership effectiveness and care quality climate. We then drew upon UK national indices of health-care trust performance—Commission for Health Improvement star ratings, Clinical Governance Review ratings and the number of patient complaints per thousand. We conducted statistical analysis to examine any significant relationships between predictor and outcome variables. Setting. The study is based on 86 hospital trusts run by the National Health Service (NHS) in the UK. The data collection is part of an annual staff survey commissioned by the NHS to explore the quality of working life. Participants. A total of 17 949 employees were randomly surveyed (41{\%} of the total sample). Results. Leadership effectiveness is associated with higher Clinical Governance Review ratings and Commission for Health Improvement star ratings for our sample ({\ss} = 0.42, P < 0.05; {\ss} = 0.37, P < 0.05, respectively), and lower patient complaints ({\ss} = –0.57, P < 0.05). In addition, 98{\%} of the relationship between leadership and patient complaints is explained by care quality climate. Conclusions. Results offer insight into how non-clinical leadership may foster performance outcomes for health-care organizations. A frequently neglected area—patient complaints—may be a valid measure to consider when assessing leadership and quality in a health-care context.",
keywords = "leadership, quality climate, hospital trust, patient complaints, performance",
author = "Helen Shipton and Claire Armstrong and Michael West and Jeremy Dawson",
year = "2008",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1093/intqhc/mzn037",
language = "English",
volume = "20",
pages = "439--445",
journal = "International Journal for Quality in Health Care",
issn = "1353-4505",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "6",

}

The impact of leadership and quality climate on hospital performance. / Shipton, Helen; Armstrong, Claire; West, Michael; Dawson, Jeremy.

In: International Journal for Quality in Health Care, Vol. 20, No. 6, 12.2008, p. 439-445.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The impact of leadership and quality climate on hospital performance

AU - Shipton, Helen

AU - Armstrong, Claire

AU - West, Michael

AU - Dawson, Jeremy

PY - 2008/12

Y1 - 2008/12

N2 - Objective. To explore the relationship between leadership effectiveness and health-care trust performance, taking into account external quality measures and the number of patient complaints; also, to examine the role of care quality climate as a mediator. Design. We developed scales for rating leadership effectiveness and care quality climate. We then drew upon UK national indices of health-care trust performance—Commission for Health Improvement star ratings, Clinical Governance Review ratings and the number of patient complaints per thousand. We conducted statistical analysis to examine any significant relationships between predictor and outcome variables. Setting. The study is based on 86 hospital trusts run by the National Health Service (NHS) in the UK. The data collection is part of an annual staff survey commissioned by the NHS to explore the quality of working life. Participants. A total of 17 949 employees were randomly surveyed (41% of the total sample). Results. Leadership effectiveness is associated with higher Clinical Governance Review ratings and Commission for Health Improvement star ratings for our sample (ß = 0.42, P < 0.05; ß = 0.37, P < 0.05, respectively), and lower patient complaints (ß = –0.57, P < 0.05). In addition, 98% of the relationship between leadership and patient complaints is explained by care quality climate. Conclusions. Results offer insight into how non-clinical leadership may foster performance outcomes for health-care organizations. A frequently neglected area—patient complaints—may be a valid measure to consider when assessing leadership and quality in a health-care context.

AB - Objective. To explore the relationship between leadership effectiveness and health-care trust performance, taking into account external quality measures and the number of patient complaints; also, to examine the role of care quality climate as a mediator. Design. We developed scales for rating leadership effectiveness and care quality climate. We then drew upon UK national indices of health-care trust performance—Commission for Health Improvement star ratings, Clinical Governance Review ratings and the number of patient complaints per thousand. We conducted statistical analysis to examine any significant relationships between predictor and outcome variables. Setting. The study is based on 86 hospital trusts run by the National Health Service (NHS) in the UK. The data collection is part of an annual staff survey commissioned by the NHS to explore the quality of working life. Participants. A total of 17 949 employees were randomly surveyed (41% of the total sample). Results. Leadership effectiveness is associated with higher Clinical Governance Review ratings and Commission for Health Improvement star ratings for our sample (ß = 0.42, P < 0.05; ß = 0.37, P < 0.05, respectively), and lower patient complaints (ß = –0.57, P < 0.05). In addition, 98% of the relationship between leadership and patient complaints is explained by care quality climate. Conclusions. Results offer insight into how non-clinical leadership may foster performance outcomes for health-care organizations. A frequently neglected area—patient complaints—may be a valid measure to consider when assessing leadership and quality in a health-care context.

KW - leadership

KW - quality climate

KW - hospital trust

KW - patient complaints

KW - performance

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=56749159054&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://intqhc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/full/20/6/439

U2 - 10.1093/intqhc/mzn037

DO - 10.1093/intqhc/mzn037

M3 - Article

VL - 20

SP - 439

EP - 445

JO - International Journal for Quality in Health Care

JF - International Journal for Quality in Health Care

SN - 1353-4505

IS - 6

ER -