The influence of fixation points on contrast detection and discrimination of patches of grating: Masking and facilitation

Robert J. Summers, Timothy S. Meese

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The use of fixation points (FPs) in visual psychophysics is common practice, though the costs and benefits of different fixation regimens have not been compared. Here we investigate the influence of several different types of FP configurations on the contrast detection of patches of sine-wave gratings. We find that for small targets (1°), the addition of a superimposed central FP can increase thresholds by a factor of 1.3 (2.5 dB) in comparison with no FP, and a factor of 1.5 (3.6 dB) in comparison with FPs that surround the target. These results are consistent with (i) a suppressive influence on the central region of the target from a central FP, and (ii) facilitatory influences from surrounding FPs. Our analysis of the slope of the psychometric function suggests that the facilitatory influence is not due to reduction of uncertainty. Plausible candidate causes for the facilitation are: (i) sensory interactions, (ii) aids to ocular accommodation and convergence, (iii) a reduction in eye-movements and (iv) more accurate placement of the observer’s window of attention. Masking by a central FP is not found for the suprathreshold task of contrast discrimination, suggesting that the masking effects of pedestal and FP do not combine linearly. This means that estimates of the level of masking produced by a contrast pedestal can depend on the details of the fixation point.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1894-1900
Number of pages7
JournalVision Research
Volume49
Issue number14
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2009

Fingerprint

Ocular Convergence
Sensory Aids
Ocular Accommodation
Psychophysics
Eye Movements
Psychometrics
Uncertainty
Cost-Benefit Analysis

Keywords

  • human vision
  • psychophysics
  • masking
  • fixation point
  • contrast sensitivity
  • methods
  • psychometric function
  • slope

Cite this

@article{83ff839b03e2482b8d2993448a1964dc,
title = "The influence of fixation points on contrast detection and discrimination of patches of grating: Masking and facilitation",
abstract = "The use of fixation points (FPs) in visual psychophysics is common practice, though the costs and benefits of different fixation regimens have not been compared. Here we investigate the influence of several different types of FP configurations on the contrast detection of patches of sine-wave gratings. We find that for small targets (1°), the addition of a superimposed central FP can increase thresholds by a factor of 1.3 (2.5 dB) in comparison with no FP, and a factor of 1.5 (3.6 dB) in comparison with FPs that surround the target. These results are consistent with (i) a suppressive influence on the central region of the target from a central FP, and (ii) facilitatory influences from surrounding FPs. Our analysis of the slope of the psychometric function suggests that the facilitatory influence is not due to reduction of uncertainty. Plausible candidate causes for the facilitation are: (i) sensory interactions, (ii) aids to ocular accommodation and convergence, (iii) a reduction in eye-movements and (iv) more accurate placement of the observer’s window of attention. Masking by a central FP is not found for the suprathreshold task of contrast discrimination, suggesting that the masking effects of pedestal and FP do not combine linearly. This means that estimates of the level of masking produced by a contrast pedestal can depend on the details of the fixation point.",
keywords = "human vision, psychophysics, masking, fixation point, contrast sensitivity, methods, psychometric function, slope",
author = "Summers, {Robert J.} and Meese, {Timothy S.}",
year = "2009",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1016/j.visres.2009.04.027",
language = "English",
volume = "49",
pages = "1894--1900",
journal = "Vision Research",
issn = "0042-6989",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "14",

}

The influence of fixation points on contrast detection and discrimination of patches of grating: Masking and facilitation. / Summers, Robert J.; Meese, Timothy S.

In: Vision Research, Vol. 49, No. 14, 07.2009, p. 1894-1900.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The influence of fixation points on contrast detection and discrimination of patches of grating: Masking and facilitation

AU - Summers, Robert J.

AU - Meese, Timothy S.

PY - 2009/7

Y1 - 2009/7

N2 - The use of fixation points (FPs) in visual psychophysics is common practice, though the costs and benefits of different fixation regimens have not been compared. Here we investigate the influence of several different types of FP configurations on the contrast detection of patches of sine-wave gratings. We find that for small targets (1°), the addition of a superimposed central FP can increase thresholds by a factor of 1.3 (2.5 dB) in comparison with no FP, and a factor of 1.5 (3.6 dB) in comparison with FPs that surround the target. These results are consistent with (i) a suppressive influence on the central region of the target from a central FP, and (ii) facilitatory influences from surrounding FPs. Our analysis of the slope of the psychometric function suggests that the facilitatory influence is not due to reduction of uncertainty. Plausible candidate causes for the facilitation are: (i) sensory interactions, (ii) aids to ocular accommodation and convergence, (iii) a reduction in eye-movements and (iv) more accurate placement of the observer’s window of attention. Masking by a central FP is not found for the suprathreshold task of contrast discrimination, suggesting that the masking effects of pedestal and FP do not combine linearly. This means that estimates of the level of masking produced by a contrast pedestal can depend on the details of the fixation point.

AB - The use of fixation points (FPs) in visual psychophysics is common practice, though the costs and benefits of different fixation regimens have not been compared. Here we investigate the influence of several different types of FP configurations on the contrast detection of patches of sine-wave gratings. We find that for small targets (1°), the addition of a superimposed central FP can increase thresholds by a factor of 1.3 (2.5 dB) in comparison with no FP, and a factor of 1.5 (3.6 dB) in comparison with FPs that surround the target. These results are consistent with (i) a suppressive influence on the central region of the target from a central FP, and (ii) facilitatory influences from surrounding FPs. Our analysis of the slope of the psychometric function suggests that the facilitatory influence is not due to reduction of uncertainty. Plausible candidate causes for the facilitation are: (i) sensory interactions, (ii) aids to ocular accommodation and convergence, (iii) a reduction in eye-movements and (iv) more accurate placement of the observer’s window of attention. Masking by a central FP is not found for the suprathreshold task of contrast discrimination, suggesting that the masking effects of pedestal and FP do not combine linearly. This means that estimates of the level of masking produced by a contrast pedestal can depend on the details of the fixation point.

KW - human vision

KW - psychophysics

KW - masking

KW - fixation point

KW - contrast sensitivity

KW - methods

KW - psychometric function

KW - slope

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=67349216177&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0042698909002156?via%3Dihub

U2 - 10.1016/j.visres.2009.04.027

DO - 10.1016/j.visres.2009.04.027

M3 - Article

VL - 49

SP - 1894

EP - 1900

JO - Vision Research

JF - Vision Research

SN - 0042-6989

IS - 14

ER -