Abstract
The success of major infrastructure projects is crucial to economic development. Abstract: Clients expectations that infrastructure projects will meet their objectives are however confronted by hackneyed construction and engineering challenges relating to cost overruns, delays, issues of quality and disputes. In dealing with major construction disputes, the focus has been on the promotion of the use of alternative resolution mechanisms. The discussions in the literature on the subject have, however, failed to align the procurement method with the parties selection of dispute resolution mechanism in the event of disputes. The result of the failure has been cost in terms of resources and relationships. An understanding of the link between procurement methods and DRM will avoid situations where cooperating construction entities end up as adversaries mainly as a result of how disputes between them are resolved. This study reports on the preliminary phase of on-going research into the avoidance/ resolution of major infrastructure project disputes. Initial findings, based on a critical review of the literature and an analysis of DRM provisions in standard forms of contract, show that: (i) The standard contracts have virtually the same provisions on dispute resolution regardless of the procurement method: arbitration, adjudication/dispute board ; (ii) whilst there is ample evidence of the impact of choice of procurement method on project success generally, the literature on the relationship between procurement methods and dispute reduction and resolution is fragmented and of limited direct relevance. What research exists on the subject is primarily confined to an examination of the relationship between procurement methods and dispute frequencies. There are, however, indications from the literature of strong connection between choice of procurement methods and DRM. The implications of the initial findings for the design of the rest of the on-going study are examined.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | Association of Researchers in Construction Management, ARCOM 2012 - Proceedings of the 28th Annual Conference |
| Editors | Simon D. Smith |
| Publisher | Association of Researchers in Construction Management |
| Pages | 979-988 |
| Number of pages | 10 |
| ISBN (Electronic) | 9780955239069 |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Jan 2012 |
| Event | 28th Annual Conference of the Association of Researchers in Construction Management, ARCOM 2012 - Edinburgh, United Kingdom Duration: 3 Sept 2012 → 5 Sept 2012 |
Publication series
| Name | Association of Researchers in Construction Management, ARCOM 2012 - Proceedings of the 28th Annual Conference |
|---|---|
| Volume | 2 |
Conference
| Conference | 28th Annual Conference of the Association of Researchers in Construction Management, ARCOM 2012 |
|---|---|
| Country/Territory | United Kingdom |
| City | Edinburgh |
| Period | 3/09/12 → 5/09/12 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 8 Decent Work and Economic Growth
Keywords
- Collaborative procurement
- Construction
- Dispute resolution mechanisms
- Procurement methods
- Project success
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The influence of procurement methods on dispute resolution mechanism choice in construction'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver