The legacy of climategate: revitalizing or undermining climate science and policy?

Reiner Grundmann*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalLetter, comment or opinionpeer-review

Abstract

The release of emails from a server at the University of East Anglia's Climate Research Unit (CRU) in November 2009 and the following climategate controversy have become a topic for interpretation in the social sciences. This article picks out some of the most visible social science comments on the affair for discussion. These comments are compared to an account of what can be seen as problematic practices by climate scientists. There is general agreement in these comments that climate science needs more openness and transparency. But when evaluating climategate a variety of responses is seen, ranging from the apologetic to the highly critical, even condemning the practices in question. It is argued that reluctance to critically examine the climategate affair, including suspect practices of scientists, has to do with the nature of the debate which is highly politicized. A call is made for more reflection on this case which should not be closed off because of political expediency.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)281-288
Number of pages8
JournalWiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change
Volume3
Issue number3
Early online date26 Apr 2012
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2012

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'The legacy of climategate: revitalizing or undermining climate science and policy?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this