The narrative construction va + infinitive in contemporary French: a linguistic phoenix risen from its medieval ashes?

Jacques Brès, Emmanuelle Labeau

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

In Old and Middle French (12th-16th centuries), va ["goes"] + inf was used in narrations in the past. A similar usage seems to have reappeared and be spreading today. However, the old construction combined with past Tenses whereas the new one is found only with forms anchored in present and future. We argue that the conTemporary construction derives not from the old one, but from a metanarrative construction. On the basis of its future in Terpretation, va + inf aids the organization of the narration, announcing subsequent events through a hypernymic process. The periphrasis thus approaches a narrative value by projecting the time of events onto that of narration. With the disappearance of all deictic markers, the go-periphrases are no longer hypernyms: they appear on the same temporal line of events as the neighboring situations and are understood as fully completed. © John Benjamins Publishing Company.

LanguageEnglish
Pages295-322
Number of pages28
JournalDiachronica
Volume30
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2013

Fingerprint

narration
linguistics
narrative
event
organization
present
Infinitive
Medieval Period
Narration
Ash
Values

Bibliographical note

The publisher should be contacted for permission to re-use or reprint the material in any form.

Keywords

  • Ccontemporary French
  • future
  • grammaticalization
  • narration
  • old French
  • Va + infinitive

Cite this

@article{6822d202d30a4769bab326539ad1da4c,
title = "The narrative construction va + infinitive in contemporary French: a linguistic phoenix risen from its medieval ashes?",
abstract = "In Old and Middle French (12th-16th centuries), va [{"}goes{"}] + inf was used in narrations in the past. A similar usage seems to have reappeared and be spreading today. However, the old construction combined with past Tenses whereas the new one is found only with forms anchored in present and future. We argue that the conTemporary construction derives not from the old one, but from a metanarrative construction. On the basis of its future in Terpretation, va + inf aids the organization of the narration, announcing subsequent events through a hypernymic process. The periphrasis thus approaches a narrative value by projecting the time of events onto that of narration. With the disappearance of all deictic markers, the go-periphrases are no longer hypernyms: they appear on the same temporal line of events as the neighboring situations and are understood as fully completed. {\circledC} John Benjamins Publishing Company.",
keywords = "Ccontemporary French, future, grammaticalization, narration, old French, Va + infinitive",
author = "Jacques Br{\`e}s and Emmanuelle Labeau",
note = "The publisher should be contacted for permission to re-use or reprint the material in any form.",
year = "2013",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1075/dia.30.3.01bre",
language = "English",
volume = "30",
pages = "295--322",
journal = "Diachronica",
issn = "0176-4225",
publisher = "John Benjamins",
number = "3",

}

The narrative construction va + infinitive in contemporary French : a linguistic phoenix risen from its medieval ashes? / Brès, Jacques; Labeau, Emmanuelle.

In: Diachronica, Vol. 30, No. 3, 12.2013, p. 295-322.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The narrative construction va + infinitive in contemporary French

T2 - Diachronica

AU - Brès, Jacques

AU - Labeau, Emmanuelle

N1 - The publisher should be contacted for permission to re-use or reprint the material in any form.

PY - 2013/12

Y1 - 2013/12

N2 - In Old and Middle French (12th-16th centuries), va ["goes"] + inf was used in narrations in the past. A similar usage seems to have reappeared and be spreading today. However, the old construction combined with past Tenses whereas the new one is found only with forms anchored in present and future. We argue that the conTemporary construction derives not from the old one, but from a metanarrative construction. On the basis of its future in Terpretation, va + inf aids the organization of the narration, announcing subsequent events through a hypernymic process. The periphrasis thus approaches a narrative value by projecting the time of events onto that of narration. With the disappearance of all deictic markers, the go-periphrases are no longer hypernyms: they appear on the same temporal line of events as the neighboring situations and are understood as fully completed. © John Benjamins Publishing Company.

AB - In Old and Middle French (12th-16th centuries), va ["goes"] + inf was used in narrations in the past. A similar usage seems to have reappeared and be spreading today. However, the old construction combined with past Tenses whereas the new one is found only with forms anchored in present and future. We argue that the conTemporary construction derives not from the old one, but from a metanarrative construction. On the basis of its future in Terpretation, va + inf aids the organization of the narration, announcing subsequent events through a hypernymic process. The periphrasis thus approaches a narrative value by projecting the time of events onto that of narration. With the disappearance of all deictic markers, the go-periphrases are no longer hypernyms: they appear on the same temporal line of events as the neighboring situations and are understood as fully completed. © John Benjamins Publishing Company.

KW - Ccontemporary French

KW - future

KW - grammaticalization

KW - narration

KW - old French

KW - Va + infinitive

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84887833366&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1075/dia.30.3.01bre

DO - 10.1075/dia.30.3.01bre

M3 - Article

VL - 30

SP - 295

EP - 322

JO - Diachronica

JF - Diachronica

SN - 0176-4225

IS - 3

ER -