Abstract
This article examines the phonological status of schwa in clitics, in particular whether or not schwa should be included in their lexical representation. Several distributional and experimental arguments pointing to the lexical status of clitic schwas are reviewed and are shown to be inconclusive, due to the existence of additional data that suggest a different interpretation not involving underlying schwas. The discussion includes experimental results that fail to show residual lip rounding in the vicinity of an omitted schwa at clitic boundaries, contra Barnes and Kavitskaya's (2002) previous claim. In the absence of evidence to the contrary, the non-contrastive nature of clitic schwas militates against their underlying status.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 159-186 |
| Number of pages | 28 |
| Journal | Journal of French Language Studies |
| Volume | 17 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Jul 2007 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The nature of the schwa/zero alternation in French clitics: Experimental and non-experimental evidence'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver