The questioning lens as research tool: the social shaping of network visualisation boundaries in the case of the UK junior doctors' contract dispute

Sian Joel Edgar, Ingrid Holme, Heli Aramo-Immonen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Social media and the data it produces lend itself to being visualised as a network. Individual Twitter users can be represented as nodes and retweeted by another Twitter user, thereby forming a relationship, an edge, between users. However, an unbounded network is a sprawling mass of nodes and edges. Boundary settings are typically applied, for example, a time period, a hashtag, a keyword search or a network substructure of a phenomenon of interest. Thus, the particular visualisation created is dependent upon the boundaries applied, enabling productive visual consumption, but concealing its social shaping. To explore this question of boundary setting and its associated issues, we draw on an example from the Twitter discussions about the UK Minister for Health, Jeremy Hunt, and the media debate surrounding the contractual hours of junior doctors during 2015–2016. We discuss the role and impact differing stakeholders have in setting these boundaries. We seek to provide a set of ‘questioning lenses’ in which we ask why these boundary settings were selected, what effect they have, and what are the potential implications of these boundary setting techniques on the visualisation consumer
Original languageEnglish
JournalInformation, Communication and Society
Early online date21 Jun 2018
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 21 Jun 2018

Fingerprint

twitter
visualization
Lenses
Visualization
Health
social media
minister
stakeholder
health

Bibliographical note

This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis Group in Information, Communication & Society on 21 Jun 2018, available online at: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/1369118X.2018.1485721

Keywords

  • Information visualisation, social network analysis, medical sociology, data analytics

Cite this

@article{e60ee8105b74499ea70c858026ad0061,
title = "The questioning lens as research tool: the social shaping of network visualisation boundaries in the case of the UK junior doctors' contract dispute",
abstract = "Social media and the data it produces lend itself to being visualised as a network. Individual Twitter users can be represented as nodes and retweeted by another Twitter user, thereby forming a relationship, an edge, between users. However, an unbounded network is a sprawling mass of nodes and edges. Boundary settings are typically applied, for example, a time period, a hashtag, a keyword search or a network substructure of a phenomenon of interest. Thus, the particular visualisation created is dependent upon the boundaries applied, enabling productive visual consumption, but concealing its social shaping. To explore this question of boundary setting and its associated issues, we draw on an example from the Twitter discussions about the UK Minister for Health, Jeremy Hunt, and the media debate surrounding the contractual hours of junior doctors during 2015–2016. We discuss the role and impact differing stakeholders have in setting these boundaries. We seek to provide a set of ‘questioning lenses’ in which we ask why these boundary settings were selected, what effect they have, and what are the potential implications of these boundary setting techniques on the visualisation consumer",
keywords = "Information visualisation, social network analysis, medical sociology, data analytics",
author = "{Joel Edgar}, Sian and Ingrid Holme and Heli Aramo-Immonen",
note = "This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis Group in Information, Communication & Society on 21 Jun 2018, available online at: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/1369118X.2018.1485721",
year = "2018",
month = "6",
day = "21",
doi = "10.1080/1369118X.2018.1485721",
language = "English",

}

The questioning lens as research tool: the social shaping of network visualisation boundaries in the case of the UK junior doctors' contract dispute. / Joel Edgar, Sian; Holme, Ingrid; Aramo-Immonen, Heli.

In: Information, Communication and Society, 21.06.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The questioning lens as research tool: the social shaping of network visualisation boundaries in the case of the UK junior doctors' contract dispute

AU - Joel Edgar, Sian

AU - Holme, Ingrid

AU - Aramo-Immonen, Heli

N1 - This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis Group in Information, Communication & Society on 21 Jun 2018, available online at: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/1369118X.2018.1485721

PY - 2018/6/21

Y1 - 2018/6/21

N2 - Social media and the data it produces lend itself to being visualised as a network. Individual Twitter users can be represented as nodes and retweeted by another Twitter user, thereby forming a relationship, an edge, between users. However, an unbounded network is a sprawling mass of nodes and edges. Boundary settings are typically applied, for example, a time period, a hashtag, a keyword search or a network substructure of a phenomenon of interest. Thus, the particular visualisation created is dependent upon the boundaries applied, enabling productive visual consumption, but concealing its social shaping. To explore this question of boundary setting and its associated issues, we draw on an example from the Twitter discussions about the UK Minister for Health, Jeremy Hunt, and the media debate surrounding the contractual hours of junior doctors during 2015–2016. We discuss the role and impact differing stakeholders have in setting these boundaries. We seek to provide a set of ‘questioning lenses’ in which we ask why these boundary settings were selected, what effect they have, and what are the potential implications of these boundary setting techniques on the visualisation consumer

AB - Social media and the data it produces lend itself to being visualised as a network. Individual Twitter users can be represented as nodes and retweeted by another Twitter user, thereby forming a relationship, an edge, between users. However, an unbounded network is a sprawling mass of nodes and edges. Boundary settings are typically applied, for example, a time period, a hashtag, a keyword search or a network substructure of a phenomenon of interest. Thus, the particular visualisation created is dependent upon the boundaries applied, enabling productive visual consumption, but concealing its social shaping. To explore this question of boundary setting and its associated issues, we draw on an example from the Twitter discussions about the UK Minister for Health, Jeremy Hunt, and the media debate surrounding the contractual hours of junior doctors during 2015–2016. We discuss the role and impact differing stakeholders have in setting these boundaries. We seek to provide a set of ‘questioning lenses’ in which we ask why these boundary settings were selected, what effect they have, and what are the potential implications of these boundary setting techniques on the visualisation consumer

KW - Information visualisation, social network analysis, medical sociology, data analytics

UR - https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/1369118X.2018.1485721

U2 - 10.1080/1369118X.2018.1485721

DO - 10.1080/1369118X.2018.1485721

M3 - Article

ER -