The role of expertise in governance processes

Reiner Grundmann

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

In present day knowledge societies political decisions are often justified on the basis of scientific expertise. Traditionally, a linear relation between knowledge production and application was postulated which would lead, with more and better science, to better policies. Empirical studies in Science and Technology studies have essentially demolished this idea. However, it is still powerful, not least among practitioners working in fields where decision making is based on large doses of expert knowledge. Based on conceptual work in the field of Science and Technology Studies (STS) I shall examine two cases of global environmental governance, ozone layer protection and global climate change. I will argue that hybridization and purification are important for two major forms of scientific expertise. One is delivered though scientific advocacy (by individual scientists or groups of scientists), the other through expert committees, i.e. institutionalized forms of collecting and communicating expertise to decision makers. Based on this analysis lessons will be drawn, also with regard to the stalling efforts at establishing an international forestry regime.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)398-403
Number of pages6
JournalForest Policy and Economics
Volume11
Issue number5-6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2009

Fingerprint

governance
science and technology
technology studies
expertise
environmental governance
science studies
advocacy
expert opinion
committees
earth's atmosphere
purification
global climate
decision making
forestry
political decision
knowledge society
expert knowledge
hybridization
climate change
knowledge production

Bibliographical note

NOTICE: this is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Forest Policy and Economics. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Grundmann, Reiner (2009). The role of expertise in governance processes. Forest Policy and Economics, 11 (5-6), pp. 398-403. DOI 10.1016/j.forpol.2008.09.005

Keywords

  • expertise
  • STS studies
  • ozone layer
  • climate change
  • forestry

Cite this

Grundmann, Reiner. / The role of expertise in governance processes. In: Forest Policy and Economics. 2009 ; Vol. 11, No. 5-6. pp. 398-403.
@article{dad538a776a94dabac082115e45271ff,
title = "The role of expertise in governance processes",
abstract = "In present day knowledge societies political decisions are often justified on the basis of scientific expertise. Traditionally, a linear relation between knowledge production and application was postulated which would lead, with more and better science, to better policies. Empirical studies in Science and Technology studies have essentially demolished this idea. However, it is still powerful, not least among practitioners working in fields where decision making is based on large doses of expert knowledge. Based on conceptual work in the field of Science and Technology Studies (STS) I shall examine two cases of global environmental governance, ozone layer protection and global climate change. I will argue that hybridization and purification are important for two major forms of scientific expertise. One is delivered though scientific advocacy (by individual scientists or groups of scientists), the other through expert committees, i.e. institutionalized forms of collecting and communicating expertise to decision makers. Based on this analysis lessons will be drawn, also with regard to the stalling efforts at establishing an international forestry regime.",
keywords = "expertise, STS studies, ozone layer, climate change, forestry",
author = "Reiner Grundmann",
note = "NOTICE: this is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Forest Policy and Economics. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Grundmann, Reiner (2009). The role of expertise in governance processes. Forest Policy and Economics, 11 (5-6), pp. 398-403. DOI 10.1016/j.forpol.2008.09.005",
year = "2009",
month = "10",
doi = "10.1016/j.forpol.2008.09.005",
language = "English",
volume = "11",
pages = "398--403",
journal = "Forest Policy and Economics",
issn = "1389-9341",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "5-6",

}

The role of expertise in governance processes. / Grundmann, Reiner.

In: Forest Policy and Economics, Vol. 11, No. 5-6, 10.2009, p. 398-403.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The role of expertise in governance processes

AU - Grundmann, Reiner

N1 - NOTICE: this is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Forest Policy and Economics. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Grundmann, Reiner (2009). The role of expertise in governance processes. Forest Policy and Economics, 11 (5-6), pp. 398-403. DOI 10.1016/j.forpol.2008.09.005

PY - 2009/10

Y1 - 2009/10

N2 - In present day knowledge societies political decisions are often justified on the basis of scientific expertise. Traditionally, a linear relation between knowledge production and application was postulated which would lead, with more and better science, to better policies. Empirical studies in Science and Technology studies have essentially demolished this idea. However, it is still powerful, not least among practitioners working in fields where decision making is based on large doses of expert knowledge. Based on conceptual work in the field of Science and Technology Studies (STS) I shall examine two cases of global environmental governance, ozone layer protection and global climate change. I will argue that hybridization and purification are important for two major forms of scientific expertise. One is delivered though scientific advocacy (by individual scientists or groups of scientists), the other through expert committees, i.e. institutionalized forms of collecting and communicating expertise to decision makers. Based on this analysis lessons will be drawn, also with regard to the stalling efforts at establishing an international forestry regime.

AB - In present day knowledge societies political decisions are often justified on the basis of scientific expertise. Traditionally, a linear relation between knowledge production and application was postulated which would lead, with more and better science, to better policies. Empirical studies in Science and Technology studies have essentially demolished this idea. However, it is still powerful, not least among practitioners working in fields where decision making is based on large doses of expert knowledge. Based on conceptual work in the field of Science and Technology Studies (STS) I shall examine two cases of global environmental governance, ozone layer protection and global climate change. I will argue that hybridization and purification are important for two major forms of scientific expertise. One is delivered though scientific advocacy (by individual scientists or groups of scientists), the other through expert committees, i.e. institutionalized forms of collecting and communicating expertise to decision makers. Based on this analysis lessons will be drawn, also with regard to the stalling efforts at establishing an international forestry regime.

KW - expertise

KW - STS studies

KW - ozone layer

KW - climate change

KW - forestry

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=71749103739&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.forpol.2008.09.005

DO - 10.1016/j.forpol.2008.09.005

M3 - Article

VL - 11

SP - 398

EP - 403

JO - Forest Policy and Economics

JF - Forest Policy and Economics

SN - 1389-9341

IS - 5-6

ER -