The role of prior exposure on the capture of attention by items in working memory

Elisabeth Moores, J.P. Maxwell

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The Biased Competition Model (BCM) suggests both top-down and bottom-up biases operate on selective attention (e.g., Desimone & Duncan, 1995). It has been suggested that top-down control signals may arise from working memory. In support, Downing (2000) found faster responses to probes presented in the location of stimuli held vs. not held in working memory. Soto, Heinke, Humphreys, and Blanco (2005) showed the involuntary nature of this effect and that shared features between stimuli were sufficient to attract attention. Here we show that stimuli held in working memory had an influence on the deployment of attentional resources even when: (1) It was detrimental to the task, (2) there was equal prior exposure, and (3) there was no bottom-up priming. These results provide further support for involuntary top-down guidance of attention from working memory and the basic tenets of the BCM, but further discredit the notion that bottom-up priming is necessary for the effect to occur.
LanguageEnglish
Pages675-695
Number of pages21
JournalVisual Cognition
Volume16
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 5 Jul 2008

Fingerprint

Short-Term Memory
Working Memory
Top-down
Stimulus
Bottom-up
Priming
Involuntary

Bibliographical note

This is an electronic version of an article published in Moores, Elisabeth J. and Maxwell, J.P. (2008) The role of prior exposure on the capture of attention by items in working memory. Visual Cognition, 16 (5). pp. 675-695. ISSN 1464-0716 is available online at: http://www.informaworld.com/openurl?genre=article&issn=1464-0716&volume=16&issue=5&spage=675

Keywords

  • Biased Competition Model
  • biases
  • selective attention
  • working memory
  • stimuli

Cite this

@article{4ea7f59ea8a5468fab3d8500037de6eb,
title = "The role of prior exposure on the capture of attention by items in working memory",
abstract = "The Biased Competition Model (BCM) suggests both top-down and bottom-up biases operate on selective attention (e.g., Desimone & Duncan, 1995). It has been suggested that top-down control signals may arise from working memory. In support, Downing (2000) found faster responses to probes presented in the location of stimuli held vs. not held in working memory. Soto, Heinke, Humphreys, and Blanco (2005) showed the involuntary nature of this effect and that shared features between stimuli were sufficient to attract attention. Here we show that stimuli held in working memory had an influence on the deployment of attentional resources even when: (1) It was detrimental to the task, (2) there was equal prior exposure, and (3) there was no bottom-up priming. These results provide further support for involuntary top-down guidance of attention from working memory and the basic tenets of the BCM, but further discredit the notion that bottom-up priming is necessary for the effect to occur.",
keywords = "Biased Competition Model, biases, selective attention, working memory, stimuli",
author = "Elisabeth Moores and J.P. Maxwell",
note = "This is an electronic version of an article published in Moores, Elisabeth J. and Maxwell, J.P. (2008) The role of prior exposure on the capture of attention by items in working memory. Visual Cognition, 16 (5). pp. 675-695. ISSN 1464-0716 is available online at: http://www.informaworld.com/openurl?genre=article&issn=1464-0716&volume=16&issue=5&spage=675",
year = "2008",
month = "7",
day = "5",
doi = "10.1080/13506280701229262",
language = "English",
volume = "16",
pages = "675--695",
journal = "Visual Cognition",
issn = "1350-6285",
publisher = "Psychology Press",
number = "5",

}

The role of prior exposure on the capture of attention by items in working memory. / Moores, Elisabeth; Maxwell, J.P.

In: Visual Cognition, Vol. 16, No. 5, 05.07.2008, p. 675-695.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The role of prior exposure on the capture of attention by items in working memory

AU - Moores, Elisabeth

AU - Maxwell, J.P.

N1 - This is an electronic version of an article published in Moores, Elisabeth J. and Maxwell, J.P. (2008) The role of prior exposure on the capture of attention by items in working memory. Visual Cognition, 16 (5). pp. 675-695. ISSN 1464-0716 is available online at: http://www.informaworld.com/openurl?genre=article&issn=1464-0716&volume=16&issue=5&spage=675

PY - 2008/7/5

Y1 - 2008/7/5

N2 - The Biased Competition Model (BCM) suggests both top-down and bottom-up biases operate on selective attention (e.g., Desimone & Duncan, 1995). It has been suggested that top-down control signals may arise from working memory. In support, Downing (2000) found faster responses to probes presented in the location of stimuli held vs. not held in working memory. Soto, Heinke, Humphreys, and Blanco (2005) showed the involuntary nature of this effect and that shared features between stimuli were sufficient to attract attention. Here we show that stimuli held in working memory had an influence on the deployment of attentional resources even when: (1) It was detrimental to the task, (2) there was equal prior exposure, and (3) there was no bottom-up priming. These results provide further support for involuntary top-down guidance of attention from working memory and the basic tenets of the BCM, but further discredit the notion that bottom-up priming is necessary for the effect to occur.

AB - The Biased Competition Model (BCM) suggests both top-down and bottom-up biases operate on selective attention (e.g., Desimone & Duncan, 1995). It has been suggested that top-down control signals may arise from working memory. In support, Downing (2000) found faster responses to probes presented in the location of stimuli held vs. not held in working memory. Soto, Heinke, Humphreys, and Blanco (2005) showed the involuntary nature of this effect and that shared features between stimuli were sufficient to attract attention. Here we show that stimuli held in working memory had an influence on the deployment of attentional resources even when: (1) It was detrimental to the task, (2) there was equal prior exposure, and (3) there was no bottom-up priming. These results provide further support for involuntary top-down guidance of attention from working memory and the basic tenets of the BCM, but further discredit the notion that bottom-up priming is necessary for the effect to occur.

KW - Biased Competition Model

KW - biases

KW - selective attention

KW - working memory

KW - stimuli

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=46949099636&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/13506280701229262

DO - 10.1080/13506280701229262

M3 - Article

VL - 16

SP - 675

EP - 695

JO - Visual Cognition

T2 - Visual Cognition

JF - Visual Cognition

SN - 1350-6285

IS - 5

ER -