The theory-practice divide: thoughts from the Editors and Senior Advisory Board of EJM

Nick J. Lee, Gordon E. Greenley

Research output: Contribution to journalEditorial

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this editorial is to bring together thoughts and opinions from the Editors and Senior Advisory Board of EJM regarding the nature of the long-debated “theory-practice divide” in marketing scholarship. Design/methodology/approach – The authors synthesise diverse opinions from senior academics in order both to inspire further debate in marketing scholarship, and to draw some important conclusions for marketing academia as a whole. Findings – The authors propose that, for marketing scholarship to mature and progress, room must be found for those who wish to focus both on practical and on pure marketing scholarship. Career advancement from both routes is vital. Research limitations/implications – The topic of the theory-practice gap is complex. Many diverse opinions are cited and, due to space constraints, the coverage of many issues is necessarily brief. Practical implications – Scholars should find the thoughts contained in the paper of significant interest. Originality/value – The paper appears to be the first to bring together such a set of diverse opinions on the subject, and to try to draw some overall pragmatic conclusions, while still recognising the multiplicity of valid thought in the area.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)5-20
Number of pages16
JournalEuropean Journal of Marketing
Volume44
Issue number1-2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2010

Fingerprint

Marketing
Practice theory
Design methodology
Career advancement
Multiplicity

Keywords

  • marketing theory
  • sciences
  • working practices

Cite this

Lee, Nick J. ; Greenley, Gordon E. / The theory-practice divide : thoughts from the Editors and Senior Advisory Board of EJM. In: European Journal of Marketing. 2010 ; Vol. 44, No. 1-2. pp. 5-20.
@article{1721468d3a114d64a1985302e5b1d316,
title = "The theory-practice divide: thoughts from the Editors and Senior Advisory Board of EJM",
abstract = "Purpose – The purpose of this editorial is to bring together thoughts and opinions from the Editors and Senior Advisory Board of EJM regarding the nature of the long-debated “theory-practice divide” in marketing scholarship. Design/methodology/approach – The authors synthesise diverse opinions from senior academics in order both to inspire further debate in marketing scholarship, and to draw some important conclusions for marketing academia as a whole. Findings – The authors propose that, for marketing scholarship to mature and progress, room must be found for those who wish to focus both on practical and on pure marketing scholarship. Career advancement from both routes is vital. Research limitations/implications – The topic of the theory-practice gap is complex. Many diverse opinions are cited and, due to space constraints, the coverage of many issues is necessarily brief. Practical implications – Scholars should find the thoughts contained in the paper of significant interest. Originality/value – The paper appears to be the first to bring together such a set of diverse opinions on the subject, and to try to draw some overall pragmatic conclusions, while still recognising the multiplicity of valid thought in the area.",
keywords = "marketing theory, sciences, working practices",
author = "Lee, {Nick J.} and Greenley, {Gordon E.}",
year = "2010",
doi = "10.1108/03090561011020147",
language = "English",
volume = "44",
pages = "5--20",
journal = "European Journal of Marketing",
issn = "0309-0566",
publisher = "Emerald Group Publishing Ltd.",
number = "1-2",

}

The theory-practice divide : thoughts from the Editors and Senior Advisory Board of EJM. / Lee, Nick J.; Greenley, Gordon E.

In: European Journal of Marketing, Vol. 44, No. 1-2, 2010, p. 5-20.

Research output: Contribution to journalEditorial

TY - JOUR

T1 - The theory-practice divide

T2 - thoughts from the Editors and Senior Advisory Board of EJM

AU - Lee, Nick J.

AU - Greenley, Gordon E.

PY - 2010

Y1 - 2010

N2 - Purpose – The purpose of this editorial is to bring together thoughts and opinions from the Editors and Senior Advisory Board of EJM regarding the nature of the long-debated “theory-practice divide” in marketing scholarship. Design/methodology/approach – The authors synthesise diverse opinions from senior academics in order both to inspire further debate in marketing scholarship, and to draw some important conclusions for marketing academia as a whole. Findings – The authors propose that, for marketing scholarship to mature and progress, room must be found for those who wish to focus both on practical and on pure marketing scholarship. Career advancement from both routes is vital. Research limitations/implications – The topic of the theory-practice gap is complex. Many diverse opinions are cited and, due to space constraints, the coverage of many issues is necessarily brief. Practical implications – Scholars should find the thoughts contained in the paper of significant interest. Originality/value – The paper appears to be the first to bring together such a set of diverse opinions on the subject, and to try to draw some overall pragmatic conclusions, while still recognising the multiplicity of valid thought in the area.

AB - Purpose – The purpose of this editorial is to bring together thoughts and opinions from the Editors and Senior Advisory Board of EJM regarding the nature of the long-debated “theory-practice divide” in marketing scholarship. Design/methodology/approach – The authors synthesise diverse opinions from senior academics in order both to inspire further debate in marketing scholarship, and to draw some important conclusions for marketing academia as a whole. Findings – The authors propose that, for marketing scholarship to mature and progress, room must be found for those who wish to focus both on practical and on pure marketing scholarship. Career advancement from both routes is vital. Research limitations/implications – The topic of the theory-practice gap is complex. Many diverse opinions are cited and, due to space constraints, the coverage of many issues is necessarily brief. Practical implications – Scholars should find the thoughts contained in the paper of significant interest. Originality/value – The paper appears to be the first to bring together such a set of diverse opinions on the subject, and to try to draw some overall pragmatic conclusions, while still recognising the multiplicity of valid thought in the area.

KW - marketing theory

KW - sciences

KW - working practices

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=76549120806&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.emeraldinsight.com/journals.htm?articleid=1838998&show=abstract

U2 - 10.1108/03090561011020147

DO - 10.1108/03090561011020147

M3 - Editorial

VL - 44

SP - 5

EP - 20

JO - European Journal of Marketing

JF - European Journal of Marketing

SN - 0309-0566

IS - 1-2

ER -