Abstract
We report the results of a survey of capital budgeting techniques used by United Kingdom firms. Where possible, the evidence is combined with data collected over a 22 year period to provide a basis for the discussion of causes of trends. We observe that there has been a substantial narrowing of the theory-practice gap in the use of project appraisal methods. The gap has also narrowed in other areas: the analysis of risk, inflation adjustment, capital budget preparation, WACC calculation and post-auditing. However, there are other elements of capital budgeting theory, e.g. probability and beta analysis which have been adopted by very few practising managers. We also discuss non-economic projects, capital rationing and hurdle rates.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 603-626 |
| Number of pages | 24 |
| Journal | Journal of Business Fnance and Accounting |
| Volume | 27 |
| Issue number | 5-6 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Jun 2000 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The theory-practice gap in capital budgeting: Evidence from the United Kingdom'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver