The training experience of primary care pharmacists

Jill K. Jesson, Keith A. Wilson, Alison Blenkinsopp

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objectives — To map the tasks, activities and training provision for primary care pharmacists (PCPs) and to identify perceived future training needs. Methods — Survey undertaken in 1998/1999 using a pre-piloted, postal, self-completion questionnaire to two samples of PCPs. Setting — PCPs in (a) the West Midlands and (b) England (outside West Midlands). Key findings — The response rate was 66 per cent. A majority (68 per cent) had worked in the role for less than two years. Eighty per cent had some form of continuing education or training for the role although only 50 per cent had a formal qualification. Over two-thirds had contributed to the funding of their training, with one-third providing all funding. Seventy-four per cent of PCPs agreed that pharmacists should go through a procedure to ensure competence (accreditation) before being allowed to work for a general medical practice or primary care group. Views on the need for formal education/training prior to work differed: 82 per cent of those with formal qualifications, but only 46 per cent of those without, considered that this should be a requirement. There was general agreement that training/education had met training needs. Views on future training closely reflected previous training experiences, with a focus upon pharmaceutical roles rather than upon generic skill development and the acquisition of management skills. Conclusions — The study provides a snapshot in time of the experience of pioneer PCPs and the training available to them. PCPs will need further training or updating if they are to provide the wider roles required by the developing needs of the National Health Service. Consideration should be given to formal recognition of the training of PCPs in order to assure competence. The expectation that pharmacists should fund their own training is likely to be a barrier to uptake of training and uncertainties over funding will militate against consistency of training.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)119-126
Number of pages8
JournalInternational Journal of Pharmacy Practice
Volume9
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2001

Fingerprint

Pharmacists
Primary Health Care
Education
Accreditation
Health
Mental Competency
Pharmaceutical Preparations
Continuing Education
National Health Programs
Financial Management
General Practice
England
Uncertainty
Teaching

Keywords

  • primary care pharmacists
  • PCPs
  • training needs
  • National Health Service
  • competence

Cite this

Jesson, Jill K. ; Wilson, Keith A. ; Blenkinsopp, Alison. / The training experience of primary care pharmacists. In: International Journal of Pharmacy Practice. 2001 ; Vol. 9, No. 2. pp. 119-126.
@article{568156d7b0044b1ca3bdbd2b982db36e,
title = "The training experience of primary care pharmacists",
abstract = "Objectives — To map the tasks, activities and training provision for primary care pharmacists (PCPs) and to identify perceived future training needs. Methods — Survey undertaken in 1998/1999 using a pre-piloted, postal, self-completion questionnaire to two samples of PCPs. Setting — PCPs in (a) the West Midlands and (b) England (outside West Midlands). Key findings — The response rate was 66 per cent. A majority (68 per cent) had worked in the role for less than two years. Eighty per cent had some form of continuing education or training for the role although only 50 per cent had a formal qualification. Over two-thirds had contributed to the funding of their training, with one-third providing all funding. Seventy-four per cent of PCPs agreed that pharmacists should go through a procedure to ensure competence (accreditation) before being allowed to work for a general medical practice or primary care group. Views on the need for formal education/training prior to work differed: 82 per cent of those with formal qualifications, but only 46 per cent of those without, considered that this should be a requirement. There was general agreement that training/education had met training needs. Views on future training closely reflected previous training experiences, with a focus upon pharmaceutical roles rather than upon generic skill development and the acquisition of management skills. Conclusions — The study provides a snapshot in time of the experience of pioneer PCPs and the training available to them. PCPs will need further training or updating if they are to provide the wider roles required by the developing needs of the National Health Service. Consideration should be given to formal recognition of the training of PCPs in order to assure competence. The expectation that pharmacists should fund their own training is likely to be a barrier to uptake of training and uncertainties over funding will militate against consistency of training.",
keywords = "primary care pharmacists, PCPs, training needs, National Health Service, competence",
author = "Jesson, {Jill K.} and Wilson, {Keith A.} and Alison Blenkinsopp",
year = "2001",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1111/j.2042-7174.2001.tb01039.x",
language = "English",
volume = "9",
pages = "119--126",
journal = "International Journal of Pharmacy Practice",
issn = "0961-7671",
publisher = "Pharmaceutical Press",
number = "2",

}

The training experience of primary care pharmacists. / Jesson, Jill K.; Wilson, Keith A.; Blenkinsopp, Alison.

In: International Journal of Pharmacy Practice, Vol. 9, No. 2, 06.2001, p. 119-126.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The training experience of primary care pharmacists

AU - Jesson, Jill K.

AU - Wilson, Keith A.

AU - Blenkinsopp, Alison

PY - 2001/6

Y1 - 2001/6

N2 - Objectives — To map the tasks, activities and training provision for primary care pharmacists (PCPs) and to identify perceived future training needs. Methods — Survey undertaken in 1998/1999 using a pre-piloted, postal, self-completion questionnaire to two samples of PCPs. Setting — PCPs in (a) the West Midlands and (b) England (outside West Midlands). Key findings — The response rate was 66 per cent. A majority (68 per cent) had worked in the role for less than two years. Eighty per cent had some form of continuing education or training for the role although only 50 per cent had a formal qualification. Over two-thirds had contributed to the funding of their training, with one-third providing all funding. Seventy-four per cent of PCPs agreed that pharmacists should go through a procedure to ensure competence (accreditation) before being allowed to work for a general medical practice or primary care group. Views on the need for formal education/training prior to work differed: 82 per cent of those with formal qualifications, but only 46 per cent of those without, considered that this should be a requirement. There was general agreement that training/education had met training needs. Views on future training closely reflected previous training experiences, with a focus upon pharmaceutical roles rather than upon generic skill development and the acquisition of management skills. Conclusions — The study provides a snapshot in time of the experience of pioneer PCPs and the training available to them. PCPs will need further training or updating if they are to provide the wider roles required by the developing needs of the National Health Service. Consideration should be given to formal recognition of the training of PCPs in order to assure competence. The expectation that pharmacists should fund their own training is likely to be a barrier to uptake of training and uncertainties over funding will militate against consistency of training.

AB - Objectives — To map the tasks, activities and training provision for primary care pharmacists (PCPs) and to identify perceived future training needs. Methods — Survey undertaken in 1998/1999 using a pre-piloted, postal, self-completion questionnaire to two samples of PCPs. Setting — PCPs in (a) the West Midlands and (b) England (outside West Midlands). Key findings — The response rate was 66 per cent. A majority (68 per cent) had worked in the role for less than two years. Eighty per cent had some form of continuing education or training for the role although only 50 per cent had a formal qualification. Over two-thirds had contributed to the funding of their training, with one-third providing all funding. Seventy-four per cent of PCPs agreed that pharmacists should go through a procedure to ensure competence (accreditation) before being allowed to work for a general medical practice or primary care group. Views on the need for formal education/training prior to work differed: 82 per cent of those with formal qualifications, but only 46 per cent of those without, considered that this should be a requirement. There was general agreement that training/education had met training needs. Views on future training closely reflected previous training experiences, with a focus upon pharmaceutical roles rather than upon generic skill development and the acquisition of management skills. Conclusions — The study provides a snapshot in time of the experience of pioneer PCPs and the training available to them. PCPs will need further training or updating if they are to provide the wider roles required by the developing needs of the National Health Service. Consideration should be given to formal recognition of the training of PCPs in order to assure competence. The expectation that pharmacists should fund their own training is likely to be a barrier to uptake of training and uncertainties over funding will militate against consistency of training.

KW - primary care pharmacists

KW - PCPs

KW - training needs

KW - National Health Service

KW - competence

UR - http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.2042-7174.2001.tb01039.x/abstract

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0034942521&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.2042-7174.2001.tb01039.x

DO - 10.1111/j.2042-7174.2001.tb01039.x

M3 - Article

VL - 9

SP - 119

EP - 126

JO - International Journal of Pharmacy Practice

JF - International Journal of Pharmacy Practice

SN - 0961-7671

IS - 2

ER -