TY - JOUR
T1 - The utility of Multicentre Epilepsy Lesion Detection (MELD) algorithm in identifying epileptic activity and predicting seizure freedom in MRI lesion-negative paediatric patients
AU - Goel, Aimee
AU - Seri, Stefano
AU - Agrawal, Shakti
AU - Kumar, Ratna
AU - Sudarsanam, Annapurna
AU - Carr, Bryony
AU - Lawley, Andrew
AU - Macpherson, Lesley
AU - Oates, Adam J.
AU - Williams, Helen
AU - Walsh, A. Richard
AU - Lo, William B.
AU - Pepper, Joshua
PY - 2024/10
Y1 - 2024/10
N2 - Aim: Paediatric patients with drug-resistant focal epilepsy (DRFE) who have no clear focal lesion identified on conventional structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are a particularly challenging cohort to treat and form an increasing part of epilepsy surgery programs. A recently developed deep-learning-based MRI lesion detection algorithm, the Multicentre Lesion Detection (MELD) algorithm, has been shown to aid detection of focal cortical dysplasia (FCD). We applied this algorithm retrospectively to a cohort of MRI-negative children with refractory focal epilepsy who underwent stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG) to determine its accuracy in identifying unseen epileptic lesions, seizure onset zones and clinical outcomes. Methods: We retrospectively applied the MELD algorithm to a consecutive series of MRI-negative patients who underwent SEEG at our tertiary Paediatric Epilepsy Surgery centre. We assessed the extent to which the identified MELD cluster or lesion area corresponded with the clinical seizure hypothesis, the epileptic network, and the positron emission tomography (PET) focal hypometabolic area. In those who underwent resective surgery, we analysed whether the region of MELD abnormality corresponded with the surgical target and to what extent this was associated with seizure freedom. Results: We identified 37 SEEG studies in 28 MRI-negative children in whom we could run the MELD algorithm. Of these, 14 (50 %) children had clusters identified on MELD. Nine (32 %) children had clusters concordant with seizure hypothesis, 6 (21 %) had clusters concordant with PET imaging, and 5 (18 %) children had at least one cluster concordant with SEEG electrode placement. Overall, 4 MELD clusters in 4 separate children correctly predicted either seizure onset zone or irritative zone based on SEEG stimulation data. Sixteen children (57 %) went on to have resective or lesional surgery. Of these, only one patient (4 %) had a MELD cluster which co-localised with the resection cavity and this child had an Engel 1 A outcome. Conclusions: In our paediatric cohort of MRI-negative patients with drug-resistant focal epilepsy, the MELD algorithm identified abnormal clusters or lesions in half of cases, and identified one radiologically occult focal cortical dysplasia. Machine-learning-based lesion detection is a promising area of research with the potential to improve seizure outcomes in this challenging cohort of radiologically occult FCD cases. However, its application should be approached with caution, especially with regards to its specificity in detecting FCD lesions, and there is still work to be done before it adds to diagnostic utility.
AB - Aim: Paediatric patients with drug-resistant focal epilepsy (DRFE) who have no clear focal lesion identified on conventional structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are a particularly challenging cohort to treat and form an increasing part of epilepsy surgery programs. A recently developed deep-learning-based MRI lesion detection algorithm, the Multicentre Lesion Detection (MELD) algorithm, has been shown to aid detection of focal cortical dysplasia (FCD). We applied this algorithm retrospectively to a cohort of MRI-negative children with refractory focal epilepsy who underwent stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG) to determine its accuracy in identifying unseen epileptic lesions, seizure onset zones and clinical outcomes. Methods: We retrospectively applied the MELD algorithm to a consecutive series of MRI-negative patients who underwent SEEG at our tertiary Paediatric Epilepsy Surgery centre. We assessed the extent to which the identified MELD cluster or lesion area corresponded with the clinical seizure hypothesis, the epileptic network, and the positron emission tomography (PET) focal hypometabolic area. In those who underwent resective surgery, we analysed whether the region of MELD abnormality corresponded with the surgical target and to what extent this was associated with seizure freedom. Results: We identified 37 SEEG studies in 28 MRI-negative children in whom we could run the MELD algorithm. Of these, 14 (50 %) children had clusters identified on MELD. Nine (32 %) children had clusters concordant with seizure hypothesis, 6 (21 %) had clusters concordant with PET imaging, and 5 (18 %) children had at least one cluster concordant with SEEG electrode placement. Overall, 4 MELD clusters in 4 separate children correctly predicted either seizure onset zone or irritative zone based on SEEG stimulation data. Sixteen children (57 %) went on to have resective or lesional surgery. Of these, only one patient (4 %) had a MELD cluster which co-localised with the resection cavity and this child had an Engel 1 A outcome. Conclusions: In our paediatric cohort of MRI-negative patients with drug-resistant focal epilepsy, the MELD algorithm identified abnormal clusters or lesions in half of cases, and identified one radiologically occult focal cortical dysplasia. Machine-learning-based lesion detection is a promising area of research with the potential to improve seizure outcomes in this challenging cohort of radiologically occult FCD cases. However, its application should be approached with caution, especially with regards to its specificity in detecting FCD lesions, and there is still work to be done before it adds to diagnostic utility.
KW - automated lesion detection
KW - drug resistant focal epilepsy
KW - epilepsy
KW - Focal cortical dysplasia
KW - MELD
KW - MRI-negative epileptic lesion
KW - multicentre lesion detection
UR - https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85201100518&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S092012112400144X?via%3Dihub
U2 - 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2024.107429
DO - 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2024.107429
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85201100518
SN - 0920-1211
VL - 206
JO - Epilepsy Research
JF - Epilepsy Research
M1 - 107429
ER -