To challenge, or not to challenge? Best practice when interviewing vulnerable suspects

Brendan O'Mahony, Rebecca Milne, Tim Grant

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This paper examines to what extent police investigators can reliably question a vulnerable suspect’s account when the evidence base for appropriate questioning styles for this particular vulnerable group is limited. We examine a simulated interview to demonstrate how difficult it is to challenge discrepancies in a vulnerable suspect’s account. It is argued from both linguistic and psychological perspectives that certain question formats may lead to acquiescence, cognitive overload and confusion for the suspect. It is suggested that one way of trying to manage these issues is through the provision of alternative narratives (i.e. ‘only one of those stories can be true’) but these too are found to be problematic.
LanguageEnglish
Pages301-313
Number of pages13
JournalPolicing
Volume6
Issue number3
Early online date27 Jun 2012
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2012

Fingerprint

best practice
police
linguistics
narrative
interview
evidence
Group

Cite this

O'Mahony, Brendan ; Milne, Rebecca ; Grant, Tim. / To challenge, or not to challenge? Best practice when interviewing vulnerable suspects. In: Policing. 2012 ; Vol. 6, No. 3. pp. 301-313.
@article{5f2b815b6d8645e29a7a0ff4ebcd411f,
title = "To challenge, or not to challenge? Best practice when interviewing vulnerable suspects",
abstract = "This paper examines to what extent police investigators can reliably question a vulnerable suspect’s account when the evidence base for appropriate questioning styles for this particular vulnerable group is limited. We examine a simulated interview to demonstrate how difficult it is to challenge discrepancies in a vulnerable suspect’s account. It is argued from both linguistic and psychological perspectives that certain question formats may lead to acquiescence, cognitive overload and confusion for the suspect. It is suggested that one way of trying to manage these issues is through the provision of alternative narratives (i.e. ‘only one of those stories can be true’) but these too are found to be problematic.",
author = "Brendan O'Mahony and Rebecca Milne and Tim Grant",
year = "2012",
doi = "10.1093/police/pas027",
language = "English",
volume = "6",
pages = "301--313",
journal = "Policing",
issn = "1752-4512",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "3",

}

To challenge, or not to challenge? Best practice when interviewing vulnerable suspects. / O'Mahony, Brendan; Milne, Rebecca; Grant, Tim.

In: Policing, Vol. 6, No. 3, 2012, p. 301-313.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - To challenge, or not to challenge? Best practice when interviewing vulnerable suspects

AU - O'Mahony, Brendan

AU - Milne, Rebecca

AU - Grant, Tim

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - This paper examines to what extent police investigators can reliably question a vulnerable suspect’s account when the evidence base for appropriate questioning styles for this particular vulnerable group is limited. We examine a simulated interview to demonstrate how difficult it is to challenge discrepancies in a vulnerable suspect’s account. It is argued from both linguistic and psychological perspectives that certain question formats may lead to acquiescence, cognitive overload and confusion for the suspect. It is suggested that one way of trying to manage these issues is through the provision of alternative narratives (i.e. ‘only one of those stories can be true’) but these too are found to be problematic.

AB - This paper examines to what extent police investigators can reliably question a vulnerable suspect’s account when the evidence base for appropriate questioning styles for this particular vulnerable group is limited. We examine a simulated interview to demonstrate how difficult it is to challenge discrepancies in a vulnerable suspect’s account. It is argued from both linguistic and psychological perspectives that certain question formats may lead to acquiescence, cognitive overload and confusion for the suspect. It is suggested that one way of trying to manage these issues is through the provision of alternative narratives (i.e. ‘only one of those stories can be true’) but these too are found to be problematic.

UR - http://policing.oxfordjournals.org/content/6/3/301

U2 - 10.1093/police/pas027

DO - 10.1093/police/pas027

M3 - Article

VL - 6

SP - 301

EP - 313

JO - Policing

T2 - Policing

JF - Policing

SN - 1752-4512

IS - 3

ER -