To challenge, or not to challenge? Best practice when interviewing vulnerable suspects

Brendan O'Mahony, Rebecca Milne, Tim Grant

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This paper examines to what extent police investigators can reliably question a vulnerable suspect’s account when the evidence base for appropriate questioning styles for this particular vulnerable group is limited. We examine a simulated interview to demonstrate how difficult it is to challenge discrepancies in a vulnerable suspect’s account. It is argued from both linguistic and psychological perspectives that certain question formats may lead to acquiescence, cognitive overload and confusion for the suspect. It is suggested that one way of trying to manage these issues is through the provision of alternative narratives (i.e. ‘only one of those stories can be true’) but these too are found to be problematic.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)301-313
Number of pages13
JournalPolicing
Volume6
Issue number3
Early online date27 Jun 2012
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2012

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'To challenge, or not to challenge? Best practice when interviewing vulnerable suspects'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this