Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Towards Clinical Application of Prediction Models for Transition to Psychosis: A Systematic Review and External Validation Study in the PRONIA Sample

  • Marlene Rosen
  • , Linda T Betz
  • , Frauke Schultze-Lutter
  • , Katharine Chisholm
  • , Theresa K Haidl
  • , Lana Kambeitz-Ilankovic
  • , Alessandro Bertolino
  • , Stefan Borgwardt
  • , Paolo Brambilla
  • , Rebekka Lencer
  • , Eva Meisenzahl
  • , Stephan Ruhrmann
  • , Raimo K R Salokangas
  • , Rachel Upthegrove
  • , Stephen J Wood
  • , Nikolaos Koutsouleris
  • , Joseph Kambeitz
  • Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
  • Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine University, Düsseldorf, Germany; Department of Psychology and Mental Health, Faculty of Psychology, Airlangga University, Surabaya, Indonesia; University Hospital of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
  • grid.6190.e 0000 0000 8580 3777 Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital of Cologne University of Cologne Cologne Germany; grid.5252.0 0000 0004 1936 973X Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy Ludwig-Maximilian-University Munich Germany
  • grid.7644.1 0000 0001 0120 3326 Department of Neurological and Psychiatric Sciences University of Bari Bari Italy
  • Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany; Department of Psychiatry, Psychiatric University Hospital, University of Basel, Switzerland.
  • Department of Neurosciences and Mental Health, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, University of Milan, Milan, Italy; Department of Pathophysiology and Transplantation, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
  • grid.4562.5 0000 0001 0057 2672 Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy University of Lübeck Lübeck Germany; grid.5949.1 0000 0001 2172 9288 Department of Psychiatry University of Münster Münster Germany; grid.5949.1 0000 0001 2172 9288 Otto Creutzfeldt Center for Behavioral and Cognitive Neuroscience University of Münster Münster Germany
  • Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine University, Düsseldorf, Germany
  • Department of Psychiatry, University of Turku, Turku, Finland
  • Institute for Mental Health and Centre for Human Brain Health, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
  • Institute for Mental Health and Centre for Human Brain Health, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK; Orygen, Melbourne, Australia; Centre for Youth Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
  • Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Ludwig-Maximilian-University, Munich, Germany; Max-Planck Institute of Psychiatry, Munich, Germany; Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
  • Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany. Electronic address: [email protected].

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

Abstract

A multitude of prediction models for a first psychotic episode in individuals at clinical high-risk (CHR) for psychosis have been proposed, but only rarely validated. We identified transition models based on clinical and neuropsychological data through a registered systematic literature search and evaluated their external validity in 173 CHRs from the Personalised Prognostic Tools for Early Psychosis Management (PRONIA) study. Discrimination performance was assessed with the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), and compared to the prediction of clinical raters. External discrimination performance varied considerably across the 22 identified models (AUC 0.40-0.76), with two models showing good discrimination performance. None of the tested models significantly outperformed clinical raters (AUC = 0.75). Combining predictions of clinical raters and the best model descriptively improved discrimination performance (AUC = 0.84). Results show that personalized prediction of transition in CHR is potentially feasible on a global scale. For implementation in clinical practice, further rounds of external validation, impact studies, and development of an ethical framework is necessary.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)478-492
Number of pages15
JournalNeuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews
Volume125
Early online date23 Feb 2021
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2021

Keywords

  • Clinical high-risk
  • Early intervention
  • Model validation
  • Precision medicine
  • Prediction
  • Psychosis
  • Translational psychiatry

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Towards Clinical Application of Prediction Models for Transition to Psychosis: A Systematic Review and External Validation Study in the PRONIA Sample'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this