Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Towards User-Centred Design of AI-Assisted Decision-Making in Law Enforcement

  • Vesna Nowack*
  • , Dalal Alrajeh
  • , Carolina Gutierrez Muñoz
  • , Catherine Hamiliton-Giachritsis
  • , Patrick Benjamin
  • , William Hobson
  • , Katie Thomas
  • , Tim Grant
  • , Juliane Kloess
  • , Jessica Woodhams
  • *Corresponding author for this work
  • Imperial College
  • University of Bath
  • University of Oxford
  • University of Edinburgh
  • University of Birmingham

Research output: Chapter in Book/Published conference outputConference publication

1 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Artificial Intelligence (AI) has become an important part of our everyday lives, yet user requirements for designing AI-assisted systems in law enforcement remain unclear. To address this gap,we conducted qualitative research on decision-making within a law enforcement agency. Our study aimed to identify limitations of existing practices, explore user requirements and understand the responsibilities that humans expect to undertake in these systems. Participants in our study highlighted the need for a system capable of processing and analysing large volumes of data efficiently to help in crime detection and prevention. Additionally, the system should satisfy requirements for scalability, accuracy, justification, trustworthiness and adaptability to be adopted in this domain. Participants also emphasised the importance of having end users review the input data that might be challenging for AI to interpret, and validate the generated output to ensure the system’s accuracy. To keep up with the evolving nature of the law enforcement domain, end users need to help the system adapt to the changes in criminal behaviour and government guidance, and technical experts need to regularly oversee and monitor the system. Furthermore, user-friendly human interaction with the system is essential for its adoption and some of the participants confirmed they would be happy to be in the loop and provide necessary feedback that the system can learn from. Finally, we argue that it is very unlikely that the system will ever achieve full automation due to the dynamic and complex nature of the law enforcement domain.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationEASE '25: Proceedings of the 29th International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering
EditorsMuhammad Ali Babar, Ayse Tosun, Stefan Wagner, Viktoria Stray
PublisherACM
Pages1138-1148
Number of pages11
ISBN (Electronic)9798400713859
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 24 Dec 2025
EventEASE 2025 -
Duration: 17 Jun 202520 Jun 2025
https://conf.researchr.org/home/ease-2025

Conference

ConferenceEASE 2025
Period17/06/2520/06/25
Internet address

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 16 - Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
    SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions

Keywords

  • Artificial Intelligence
  • decision making
  • human in the loop
  • law enforcement
  • qualitative methods

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Towards User-Centred Design of AI-Assisted Decision-Making in Law Enforcement'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this