Transferring knowledge of risk management to the board of directors and executives

Eduardo Rodriguez, John S. Edwards

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) and Knowledge Management (KM) both encompass top-down and bottom-up approaches developing and embedding risk knowledge concepts and processes in strategy, policies, risk appetite definition, the decision-making process and business processes. The capacity to transfer risk knowledge affects all stakeholders and understanding of the risk knowledge about the enterprise’s value is a key requirement in order to identify protection strategies for business sustainability.
There are various factors that affect this capacity for transferring and understanding. Previous work has established that there is a difference between the influence of KM variables on Risk Control and on the perceived value of ERM. Communication among groups appears as a significant variable in improving Risk Control but only as a weak factor in improving the perceived value of ERM. However, the ERM mandate requires for its implementation a clear understanding, of risk management (RM) policies, actions and results, and the use of the integral view of RM as a governance and compliance program to support the value driven management of the organization.
Furthermore, ERM implementation demands better capabilities for unification of the criteria of risk analysis, alignment of policies and protection guidelines across the organization. These capabilities can be affected by risk knowledge sharing between the RM group and the Board of Directors and other executives in the organization.
This research presents an exploratory analysis of risk knowledge transfer variables used in risk management practice. A survey to risk management executives from 65 firms in various industries was undertaken and 108 answers were analyzed. Potential relationships among the variables are investigated using descriptive statistics and multivariate statistical models. The level of understanding of risk management policies and reports by the board is related to the quality of the flow of communication in the firm and perceived level of integration of the risk policy in the business processes.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)162-180
Number of pages19
JournalJournal of Risk Management in Financial Institutions
Volume5
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - 1 Mar 2012

Fingerprint

Risk Management
Knowledge Management
Business Process
Knowledge
Board of directors
Risk management
Risk Sharing
Enterprise risk management
Exploratory Analysis
Group Communication
Knowledge Transfer
Knowledge Sharing
Governance
Risk Analysis
Multivariate Models
Sustainability
Bottom-up
Unification
Compliance
Statistical Model

Keywords

  • knowledge sharing
  • risk knowledge management
  • risk control
  • knowledge management
  • knowledge transfer
  • enterprise risk management
  • communication

Cite this

@article{e4f23196ee504f1f9fc3d088497ba378,
title = "Transferring knowledge of risk management to the board of directors and executives",
abstract = "Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) and Knowledge Management (KM) both encompass top-down and bottom-up approaches developing and embedding risk knowledge concepts and processes in strategy, policies, risk appetite definition, the decision-making process and business processes. The capacity to transfer risk knowledge affects all stakeholders and understanding of the risk knowledge about the enterprise’s value is a key requirement in order to identify protection strategies for business sustainability.There are various factors that affect this capacity for transferring and understanding. Previous work has established that there is a difference between the influence of KM variables on Risk Control and on the perceived value of ERM. Communication among groups appears as a significant variable in improving Risk Control but only as a weak factor in improving the perceived value of ERM. However, the ERM mandate requires for its implementation a clear understanding, of risk management (RM) policies, actions and results, and the use of the integral view of RM as a governance and compliance program to support the value driven management of the organization. Furthermore, ERM implementation demands better capabilities for unification of the criteria of risk analysis, alignment of policies and protection guidelines across the organization. These capabilities can be affected by risk knowledge sharing between the RM group and the Board of Directors and other executives in the organization. This research presents an exploratory analysis of risk knowledge transfer variables used in risk management practice. A survey to risk management executives from 65 firms in various industries was undertaken and 108 answers were analyzed. Potential relationships among the variables are investigated using descriptive statistics and multivariate statistical models. The level of understanding of risk management policies and reports by the board is related to the quality of the flow of communication in the firm and perceived level of integration of the risk policy in the business processes.",
keywords = "knowledge sharing, risk knowledge management, risk control, knowledge management, knowledge transfer, enterprise risk management, communication",
author = "Eduardo Rodriguez and Edwards, {John S.}",
year = "2012",
month = "3",
day = "1",
language = "English",
volume = "5",
pages = "162--180",
journal = "Journal of Risk Management in Financial Institutions",
issn = "1752-8887",
publisher = "Henry Stewart Publications",
number = "2",

}

Transferring knowledge of risk management to the board of directors and executives. / Rodriguez, Eduardo; Edwards, John S.

In: Journal of Risk Management in Financial Institutions, Vol. 5, No. 2, 01.03.2012, p. 162-180.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Transferring knowledge of risk management to the board of directors and executives

AU - Rodriguez, Eduardo

AU - Edwards, John S.

PY - 2012/3/1

Y1 - 2012/3/1

N2 - Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) and Knowledge Management (KM) both encompass top-down and bottom-up approaches developing and embedding risk knowledge concepts and processes in strategy, policies, risk appetite definition, the decision-making process and business processes. The capacity to transfer risk knowledge affects all stakeholders and understanding of the risk knowledge about the enterprise’s value is a key requirement in order to identify protection strategies for business sustainability.There are various factors that affect this capacity for transferring and understanding. Previous work has established that there is a difference between the influence of KM variables on Risk Control and on the perceived value of ERM. Communication among groups appears as a significant variable in improving Risk Control but only as a weak factor in improving the perceived value of ERM. However, the ERM mandate requires for its implementation a clear understanding, of risk management (RM) policies, actions and results, and the use of the integral view of RM as a governance and compliance program to support the value driven management of the organization. Furthermore, ERM implementation demands better capabilities for unification of the criteria of risk analysis, alignment of policies and protection guidelines across the organization. These capabilities can be affected by risk knowledge sharing between the RM group and the Board of Directors and other executives in the organization. This research presents an exploratory analysis of risk knowledge transfer variables used in risk management practice. A survey to risk management executives from 65 firms in various industries was undertaken and 108 answers were analyzed. Potential relationships among the variables are investigated using descriptive statistics and multivariate statistical models. The level of understanding of risk management policies and reports by the board is related to the quality of the flow of communication in the firm and perceived level of integration of the risk policy in the business processes.

AB - Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) and Knowledge Management (KM) both encompass top-down and bottom-up approaches developing and embedding risk knowledge concepts and processes in strategy, policies, risk appetite definition, the decision-making process and business processes. The capacity to transfer risk knowledge affects all stakeholders and understanding of the risk knowledge about the enterprise’s value is a key requirement in order to identify protection strategies for business sustainability.There are various factors that affect this capacity for transferring and understanding. Previous work has established that there is a difference between the influence of KM variables on Risk Control and on the perceived value of ERM. Communication among groups appears as a significant variable in improving Risk Control but only as a weak factor in improving the perceived value of ERM. However, the ERM mandate requires for its implementation a clear understanding, of risk management (RM) policies, actions and results, and the use of the integral view of RM as a governance and compliance program to support the value driven management of the organization. Furthermore, ERM implementation demands better capabilities for unification of the criteria of risk analysis, alignment of policies and protection guidelines across the organization. These capabilities can be affected by risk knowledge sharing between the RM group and the Board of Directors and other executives in the organization. This research presents an exploratory analysis of risk knowledge transfer variables used in risk management practice. A survey to risk management executives from 65 firms in various industries was undertaken and 108 answers were analyzed. Potential relationships among the variables are investigated using descriptive statistics and multivariate statistical models. The level of understanding of risk management policies and reports by the board is related to the quality of the flow of communication in the firm and perceived level of integration of the risk policy in the business processes.

KW - knowledge sharing

KW - risk knowledge management

KW - risk control

KW - knowledge management

KW - knowledge transfer

KW - enterprise risk management

KW - communication

UR - http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/hsp/jrmfi/2012/00000005/00000002/art00007

M3 - Article

VL - 5

SP - 162

EP - 180

JO - Journal of Risk Management in Financial Institutions

JF - Journal of Risk Management in Financial Institutions

SN - 1752-8887

IS - 2

ER -