Tying Up the Loose Ends of National Self-Determination: British, French and American Experts in Peace Planning, 1917−1919

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    This article examines Allied peace planning during the latter stages of the First World War by comparing and connecting the British, French, and American expert groups. These academic experts were expected to apply the publicly announced programme of national self-determination to the local realities in Europe without losing sight of their governments’ geopolitical directives. Contacts and exchanges between the three groups, largely neglected in the literature, played a crucial role in shaping the experts’ work. At the same time, persisting national suspicion and the fragile institutional position of the experts prevented open debate on the precise meaning of national self-determination and thereby forestalled the development of a coherent Allied peace programme. This shortcoming would become a serious burden for the negotiations at the Paris Peace Conference and the early interwar period, in that it led to growing frustration and undermined Allied commitment to the Paris peace treaties.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)727-750
    Number of pages24
    JournalThe Historical Journal
    Volume57
    Issue number3
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 14 Aug 2014

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Tying Up the Loose Ends of National Self-Determination: British, French and American Experts in Peace Planning, 1917−1919'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this