TY - JOUR
T1 - Type-2 TOPSIS
T2 - a group decision problem when ideal values are not extreme endpoints
AU - Langroudi, Majid Z.A.
AU - Emrouznejad, Ali
AU - Mustafa, Adli
AU - Ignatius, Joshua
N1 - Copyright 2012 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2013/9
Y1 - 2013/9
N2 - In the traditional TOPSIS, the ideal solutions are assumed to be located at the endpoints of the data interval. However, not all performance attributes possess ideal values at the endpoints. We termed performance attributes that have ideal values at extreme points as Type-1 attributes. Type-2 attributes however possess ideal values somewhere within the data interval instead of being at the extreme end points. This provides a preference ranking problem when all attributes are computed and assumed to be of the Type-1 nature. To overcome this issue, we propose a new Fuzzy DEA method for computing the ideal values and distance function of Type-2 attributes in a TOPSIS methodology. Our method allows Type-1 and Type-2 attributes to be included in an evaluation system without compromising the ranking quality. The efficacy of the proposed model is illustrated with a vendor evaluation case for a high-tech investment decision making exercise. A comparison analysis with the traditional TOPSIS is also presented.
AB - In the traditional TOPSIS, the ideal solutions are assumed to be located at the endpoints of the data interval. However, not all performance attributes possess ideal values at the endpoints. We termed performance attributes that have ideal values at extreme points as Type-1 attributes. Type-2 attributes however possess ideal values somewhere within the data interval instead of being at the extreme end points. This provides a preference ranking problem when all attributes are computed and assumed to be of the Type-1 nature. To overcome this issue, we propose a new Fuzzy DEA method for computing the ideal values and distance function of Type-2 attributes in a TOPSIS methodology. Our method allows Type-1 and Type-2 attributes to be included in an evaluation system without compromising the ranking quality. The efficacy of the proposed model is illustrated with a vendor evaluation case for a high-tech investment decision making exercise. A comparison analysis with the traditional TOPSIS is also presented.
KW - fuzzy data envelopment analysis
KW - group decision making
KW - MCDM
KW - multiple attribute decision making (MADM)
KW - TOPSIS
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84880134440&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs10726-012-9296-4
U2 - 10.1007/s10726-012-9296-4
DO - 10.1007/s10726-012-9296-4
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84880134440
SN - 0926-2644
VL - 22
SP - 851
EP - 866
JO - Group Decision and Negotiation
JF - Group Decision and Negotiation
IS - 5
ER -