UK bone conduction hearing device consensus workshop: narrative summary

Rishi Mandavia*, Panagiotis A. Dimitriadis, Peter Monksfield, Amanda Hall, Jaydip Ray, Anne G.M. Schilder

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debate

Abstract

Objectives: To identify United Kingdom (UK)-specific research priorities in the field of bone conduction hearing devices (BCHDs).

Method: Narrative summary of the discussions and outcomes of a UK BCHD research workshop. The workshop was organized on 8 September 2016 under the auspices of the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Clinical Research Network (CRN) ENT Specialty group and Royal College of Surgeons (RCS) Clinical Research Initiative. Representatives from a wide range of patient and professional groups from the UK and abroad were invited to attend. Main outcome measures were research priorities and approaches in the field of BCHDs.

Results: Key research questions in the field of BCHDs are as follows: (1) What are the existing national BCHD practices? (2) What are the patient information and support needs on BCHDs? (3) Which outcomes should be measured across clinical studies in the field of BCHDs? The workshop suggested the following approaches to address these priorities: (1) a service evaluation of current UK BCHD practice; development of a national registry of BCHDs; (2) qualitative research to understand patient information and support needs; development of patient decision support tools; (3) development of core outcome sets for BCHDs.

Discussion: Building upon the framework of the recent UK Research Agenda for ENT, Hearing and Balance, patients and professionals defined key UK-specific research priorities and approaches in the field of BCHDs. This approach promotes engagement, buy-in, national collaboration and thereby value of future BCHD research.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)187-191
JournalCochlear Implants International
Volume18
Issue number4
Early online date3 May 2017
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 3 May 2017

Fingerprint

Consensus Development Conferences
Bone Conduction
Equipment and Supplies
Research
Education
United Kingdom
Qualitative Research
National Institutes of Health (U.S.)
Hearing

Bibliographical note

This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Cochlear Implants International on 3/5/17, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/14670100.2017.1322228

Keywords

  • research priorities
  • research agenda
  • bone conduction hearing devices
  • hearing
  • hearing implants
  • consensus

Cite this

Mandavia, R., Dimitriadis, P. A., Monksfield, P., Hall, A., Ray, J., & Schilder, A. G. M. (2017). UK bone conduction hearing device consensus workshop: narrative summary. Cochlear Implants International, 18(4), 187-191 . https://doi.org/10.1080/14670100.2017.1322228
Mandavia, Rishi ; Dimitriadis, Panagiotis A. ; Monksfield, Peter ; Hall, Amanda ; Ray, Jaydip ; Schilder, Anne G.M. / UK bone conduction hearing device consensus workshop : narrative summary. In: Cochlear Implants International. 2017 ; Vol. 18, No. 4. pp. 187-191 .
@article{09de46d505674cfda8fa22588d96b97e,
title = "UK bone conduction hearing device consensus workshop: narrative summary",
abstract = "Objectives: To identify United Kingdom (UK)-specific research priorities in the field of bone conduction hearing devices (BCHDs).Method: Narrative summary of the discussions and outcomes of a UK BCHD research workshop. The workshop was organized on 8 September 2016 under the auspices of the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Clinical Research Network (CRN) ENT Specialty group and Royal College of Surgeons (RCS) Clinical Research Initiative. Representatives from a wide range of patient and professional groups from the UK and abroad were invited to attend. Main outcome measures were research priorities and approaches in the field of BCHDs.Results: Key research questions in the field of BCHDs are as follows: (1) What are the existing national BCHD practices? (2) What are the patient information and support needs on BCHDs? (3) Which outcomes should be measured across clinical studies in the field of BCHDs? The workshop suggested the following approaches to address these priorities: (1) a service evaluation of current UK BCHD practice; development of a national registry of BCHDs; (2) qualitative research to understand patient information and support needs; development of patient decision support tools; (3) development of core outcome sets for BCHDs.Discussion: Building upon the framework of the recent UK Research Agenda for ENT, Hearing and Balance, patients and professionals defined key UK-specific research priorities and approaches in the field of BCHDs. This approach promotes engagement, buy-in, national collaboration and thereby value of future BCHD research.",
keywords = "research priorities, research agenda, bone conduction hearing devices, hearing, hearing implants, consensus",
author = "Rishi Mandavia and Dimitriadis, {Panagiotis A.} and Peter Monksfield and Amanda Hall and Jaydip Ray and Schilder, {Anne G.M.}",
note = "This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Cochlear Implants International on 3/5/17, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/14670100.2017.1322228",
year = "2017",
month = "5",
day = "3",
doi = "10.1080/14670100.2017.1322228",
language = "English",
volume = "18",
pages = "187--191",
journal = "Cochlear Implants International",
issn = "1467-0100",
publisher = "Maney Publishing",
number = "4",

}

Mandavia, R, Dimitriadis, PA, Monksfield, P, Hall, A, Ray, J & Schilder, AGM 2017, 'UK bone conduction hearing device consensus workshop: narrative summary', Cochlear Implants International, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 187-191 . https://doi.org/10.1080/14670100.2017.1322228

UK bone conduction hearing device consensus workshop : narrative summary. / Mandavia, Rishi; Dimitriadis, Panagiotis A.; Monksfield, Peter; Hall, Amanda; Ray, Jaydip; Schilder, Anne G.M.

In: Cochlear Implants International, Vol. 18, No. 4, 03.05.2017, p. 187-191 .

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debate

TY - JOUR

T1 - UK bone conduction hearing device consensus workshop

T2 - narrative summary

AU - Mandavia, Rishi

AU - Dimitriadis, Panagiotis A.

AU - Monksfield, Peter

AU - Hall, Amanda

AU - Ray, Jaydip

AU - Schilder, Anne G.M.

N1 - This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Cochlear Implants International on 3/5/17, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/14670100.2017.1322228

PY - 2017/5/3

Y1 - 2017/5/3

N2 - Objectives: To identify United Kingdom (UK)-specific research priorities in the field of bone conduction hearing devices (BCHDs).Method: Narrative summary of the discussions and outcomes of a UK BCHD research workshop. The workshop was organized on 8 September 2016 under the auspices of the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Clinical Research Network (CRN) ENT Specialty group and Royal College of Surgeons (RCS) Clinical Research Initiative. Representatives from a wide range of patient and professional groups from the UK and abroad were invited to attend. Main outcome measures were research priorities and approaches in the field of BCHDs.Results: Key research questions in the field of BCHDs are as follows: (1) What are the existing national BCHD practices? (2) What are the patient information and support needs on BCHDs? (3) Which outcomes should be measured across clinical studies in the field of BCHDs? The workshop suggested the following approaches to address these priorities: (1) a service evaluation of current UK BCHD practice; development of a national registry of BCHDs; (2) qualitative research to understand patient information and support needs; development of patient decision support tools; (3) development of core outcome sets for BCHDs.Discussion: Building upon the framework of the recent UK Research Agenda for ENT, Hearing and Balance, patients and professionals defined key UK-specific research priorities and approaches in the field of BCHDs. This approach promotes engagement, buy-in, national collaboration and thereby value of future BCHD research.

AB - Objectives: To identify United Kingdom (UK)-specific research priorities in the field of bone conduction hearing devices (BCHDs).Method: Narrative summary of the discussions and outcomes of a UK BCHD research workshop. The workshop was organized on 8 September 2016 under the auspices of the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Clinical Research Network (CRN) ENT Specialty group and Royal College of Surgeons (RCS) Clinical Research Initiative. Representatives from a wide range of patient and professional groups from the UK and abroad were invited to attend. Main outcome measures were research priorities and approaches in the field of BCHDs.Results: Key research questions in the field of BCHDs are as follows: (1) What are the existing national BCHD practices? (2) What are the patient information and support needs on BCHDs? (3) Which outcomes should be measured across clinical studies in the field of BCHDs? The workshop suggested the following approaches to address these priorities: (1) a service evaluation of current UK BCHD practice; development of a national registry of BCHDs; (2) qualitative research to understand patient information and support needs; development of patient decision support tools; (3) development of core outcome sets for BCHDs.Discussion: Building upon the framework of the recent UK Research Agenda for ENT, Hearing and Balance, patients and professionals defined key UK-specific research priorities and approaches in the field of BCHDs. This approach promotes engagement, buy-in, national collaboration and thereby value of future BCHD research.

KW - research priorities

KW - research agenda

KW - bone conduction hearing devices

KW - hearing

KW - hearing implants

KW - consensus

UR - http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/14670100.2017.1322228

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85019000543&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/14670100.2017.1322228

DO - 10.1080/14670100.2017.1322228

M3 - Comment/debate

AN - SCOPUS:85019000543

VL - 18

SP - 187

EP - 191

JO - Cochlear Implants International

JF - Cochlear Implants International

SN - 1467-0100

IS - 4

ER -