UK business schools : historical contexts and future scenarios: summary report from an EBK/AIM Management Research Forum

Chris Ivory; Peter Miskell; Helen Shipton; Andrew White; Kathrin Moeslin; Andy Neely

UK business schools : historical contexts and future scenarios: summary report from an EBK/AIM Management Research Forum

Chris Ivory
, Peter Miskell
, Helen Shipton
, Andrew White
, Kathrin Moeslin
, Andy Neely

Newcastle University
Handelshochschule Leipzig
Cranfield University

Research output: Book/Report › Commissioned report

Abstract

This report begins with an analysis of the historical development of management education in Britain since 1945. It provides a context for understanding conflicting themes in current debates about business schools and examines how the different types of business school have evolved in the UK within very different education institutions.
It places the current challenges faced by business schools in context, offers guidance on the strategic options available, and discusses some of the practical implications of the different paths outlined.

Original language	English
Publisher	Advanced Institute of Management Research (AIM)
Commissioning body	AIM - Advanced Institute of Management
Number of pages	28
ISBN (Print)	978-0-955185-07-6
Publication status	Published - 2006

Publication series

Name	Academic White Paper
Publisher	AIM

Cite this

@book{853d021d306c40b4a5c5bae67c812d44,

title = "UK business schools : historical contexts and future scenarios: summary report from an EBK/AIM Management Research Forum",

abstract = "This report begins with an analysis of the historical development of management education in Britain since 1945. It provides a context for understanding conflicting themes in current debates about business schools and examines how the different types of business school have evolved in the UK within very different education institutions. It places the current challenges faced by business schools in context, offers guidance on the strategic options available, and discusses some of the practical implications of the different paths outlined.",

author = "Chris Ivory and Peter Miskell and Helen Shipton and Andrew White and Kathrin Moeslin and Andy Neely",

year = "2006",

language = "English",

isbn = "978-0-955185-07-6 ",

series = "Academic White Paper",

publisher = "Advanced Institute of Management Research (AIM)",

}

TY - BOOK

T1 - UK business schools : historical contexts and future scenarios

T2 - summary report from an EBK/AIM Management Research Forum

AU - Ivory, Chris

AU - Miskell, Peter

AU - Shipton, Helen

AU - White, Andrew

AU - Moeslin, Kathrin

AU - Neely, Andy

PY - 2006

Y1 - 2006

N2 - This report begins with an analysis of the historical development of management education in Britain since 1945. It provides a context for understanding conflicting themes in current debates about business schools and examines how the different types of business school have evolved in the UK within very different education institutions. It places the current challenges faced by business schools in context, offers guidance on the strategic options available, and discusses some of the practical implications of the different paths outlined.

AB - This report begins with an analysis of the historical development of management education in Britain since 1945. It provides a context for understanding conflicting themes in current debates about business schools and examines how the different types of business school have evolved in the UK within very different education institutions. It places the current challenges faced by business schools in context, offers guidance on the strategic options available, and discusses some of the practical implications of the different paths outlined.

M3 - Commissioned report

SN - 978-0-955185-07-6

T3 - Academic White Paper

BT - UK business schools : historical contexts and future scenarios

PB - Advanced Institute of Management Research (AIM)

ER -

UK business schools : historical contexts and future scenarios: summary report from an EBK/AIM Management Research Forum

Abstract

Publication series

Fingerprint

Cite this